I concur (as do others), and have asked repeatedly that they go public with at least the affiliations. To be fair, privacy concerns were raised by participants. I like tea...
Why all the partial secrecy? Why ANY secrecy? It's not military work, its civilian regulation development. Even your local school board has open meeting laws to guard against abuse of the system. It is always easy for the big money groups to hide behind the closed doors and make more money for themselves. Too bad the FAA is letting it happen like this. You probably want to play nice so you can stay informed and on the ARC, but the American way is supposed to be that you dump the tea in the water, right? :)
No can do. I am not at liberty to discuss exactly what is happening, and we were asked not to divulge the names and or affiliations of the other participants. Makes for some easy fundraising…
You don’t have to remind me. Who do you think we’re up against in the ARC, Elmer Fudd? Understand, I am a proponent of this technology, but we aren’t exactly in there calling the shots. This is a big undertaking against moneyed interests that have plenty of political clout.
We do, fully autonomous (no pilot in the loop), will not be supported until we have a certified sense and avoid system. From the Slow Stick to the Global Hawk...
Rather interesting that there are no comments and or suggestions well, except for the two that got deleted. It is important that we remind folks that we are still out here and we’d like to do this in the future.
Comments
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next