3689692155?profile=originalLocal Motors had one of their most successful co-creation challenges in the past 40 days with the launch of ACDC (Airbus Cargo Drone Challenge). The challenge started with mostly otherworldly and crazy designs from Local Motors' base automotive design community, but later evolved into a truly collaborative effort between designers and engineers with the shared vision of building the next gen unmanned cargo vehicle.

Looking at the submissions, you will see a nice blend of concepts ranging from pure aircraft design to more user and application focused proposals. You can actually be a part of the selection process by going to the LM platform between June 6th and 16th to vote for your favorite concept!

Here a few of my favorite, non-derivative, original submissions:

Starting with a friendly, approachable, multi-purpose Cargo Drone, POD

3689692123?profile=original                          look, it even has a pair of cute eyes!

3689691842?profile=original

Volans

33bb4b6cc489a5f081692c6992bb4e2c.png?width=600

SkyPac

b28063fb8221e09f0731f8736c9aa636.jpg?width=600

LUV

ee34a892a100524041b6e2e086c5c907.png?width=600

This Crazy, most-probably-invalid-but-still-elegant, Design

d217694ac704bfa032e1a77d51df2a67.jpg?width=600

Andromeda (disclaimer: totally not a spy drone!)

0b3133d4f2b9fc89f85243f3e6d8111b.jpg?width=600

And finally Airbus Engineers' dream design :) it does remind me of a boring but functional chameleon! 

9adeaf105bbb23585181a8ac97d088b1.jpg?width=600

I bet 50K, of my currency of choice, this last one or its equally German sibling is going to win the grand prize :) Let's see! It must have been a fun journey for all the participants and organizers. 

P.S.: feel free to build a prototype of any of these designs or others on the challenge page, LM has a very community friendly license for this purpose as long as you don't use the designs commercially. 

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!

Join diydrones

Comments

  • I'm not an expert airplane designer, but I know a thing or two, and I would think that a CG at that yellow tag is way too far aft. Normally it would be a bit behind the orange stripe on the wing. (near the thickest part of the wing)

    I honestly don't see any way this layout is going to work.  Why wouldn't you simply move the front lift motors well in front of the wing, as is typically done?

  • @Rob I agree with your point. The forklift idea actually came to us from another friend, but it seemed too inefficient. The current CG is somewhere around the yellow tag on top of the fuselage. One idea to help with CG in hover mode was to bring the front pair of motors forward and place them 10-15 cm under the wing. Knowing that batteries make the single heaviest piece of concentrated mass on the vehicle (6-8 kg), they should balance the weight of the wings and bring the CG a bit aft towards the center of 4 hover motors. 

    Another crazy idea was to move the cargo box internally forward as we transition to fixed wing flight. 

    Do you see any other solution that wouldn't completely scrap the whole design? :) I will forward it to the designer

  • I'm extremely curious about how the CG on the P.O.D. is supposed to work out.  The airplane mode would require the CG somewhere in the middle of the wing.  I can't see how that will work out while in hover mode?

    Maybe it operates like a forklift, with the front motors doing all the lifting, and the rear motors pushing down for balance?

    I see some comments on the thread for that machine, but they don't clarify the issue.

This reply was deleted.