3D Robotics

3689602378?profile=originalFrom CNN:

Seeking to speed up government rule-making about the use of drones in newsgathering, CNN and the Georgia Institute of Technology said Monday that they would jointly study how to operate unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) safely and effectively.

In a press release, the partners called it a "research initiative" and said they will share data with the Federal Aviation Authority "as it considers regulations that will allow for the safe and effective operation of UAVs by media outlets."

The announcement comes amid widespread interest in newsrooms across the country in what's been dubbed "drone journalism," and equally widespread uncertainty about the legality of it. The FAA has severely limited the use of drones for commercial purposes, including newsgathering. It is due to develop new drone rules by September 2015.

"Our hope is that by working cooperatively to share knowledge, we can accelerate the process for CNN and other media organizations to safely integrate this new technology into their coverage plans," David Vigilante, CNN's senior vice president for legal, said in a statement. "It's a natural opportunity to work with our neighbors at Georgia Tech, who have experience and insights into this area."

CNN and the university said the project work would start sometime this summer. "The effort will evaluate the technology, personnel and safety needs to operate effectively in the national air space," according to the press release. (CNN and CNNMoney are owned by Time Warner.)

"We're excited to be engaging with CNN to study the newsgathering applications for UAVs and look forward to working with one of the most respected news operations in the world," said Mike Heiges, principal research engineer at the Georgia Tech Research Institute.

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!

Join diydrones

Comments

  • Ironic, since they are certainly doing their fair share to spread FUD about "drones" on TV. Maybe a little bit of "we can do it, but you can't"?

This reply was deleted.