Moderator

Dear Friends,

we doing fly test of HexaCoax developed by Daniele A. based on MP32+ VRIMU. The video is the first flight test . We need to finisht the work on PID.

Ciao a tutti,
ieri abbiamo collaudato e fatto volare l'hexa coax di Daniele, una bella realizzazione in aluminio . Il video e' del primo volo e Daniele stava prenderndo familiarita' con il mezzo.
Di solito pilota riproduzioni aeree , ma si e' trovato subito a suoi agio con il suo nuvo drone , bisogna ancora lavorare sui PID , specialmente sullo YAW ancora un po' molle.

This is the configuration of HexaCoax.

I componenti sono :


Firmware : Arducopter32 NG
Scheda CPU : Multipilot32
Scheda IMU : VRIMU
Regolatori Motorius 30 A
Motori Motorius 2217

The source code , lib and ide snapshot is available here :

Lo snapshot del codice utilizzato e' questo : http://code.google.com/p/multipilot32/downloads/detail?name=vrobotix-ide-0.0.4%20mixer%20hexacoax.rar&can=2&q=#makechanges

 

Original post : http://www.virtualrobotix.com/profiles/blogs/diy-hexacoax-by-daniele-a

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!

Join diydrones

Comments

  • Moderator

    Hi Randy,

    the big advantages is that it is very stable if you broke a propeller ...in normal quad if you broke one propeller you crash in a hexa radial if you broke is possible that you lost a controlo of your hexa .

    With a Coax configuration you can lose until 2 propeller and continue to fly. I tested the hexa radial and hexa coax configuration and i saw this results.

    I'm working on a heavy lift hexa coax ... yesterday i fly it. I'm preparing a video. The ACopter 32 Heavy lift generation is begin ;)

     

  • Developer

    Hi Roberto,

     

    Looks like it's getting close.

     

    So what's the advantage of a hexa coaxial?  I guess one thing is that it's shaped like a tri-copter but it doesn't need a servo to control yaw.

     

    ...but actually I never really understood what is good about having an engine above and below on each arm (i.e. coaxial).  There's a lot of disturbance on the bottom prop so I believe it's not as efficient (and I know it needs to spin at a different speed from the top one - faster i think).

This reply was deleted.