You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!

Join diydrones


  • MR60

    @Paul, yes and especially when you can do the same at sub 5k euro budget thanks to Aurdupilot:

  • and is / was funded by the EU.... Wondering how many millions euros went into it

  • MR60

    Nice but remains more of a marketing/lobbying experiment than a reality in production. Indeed as long as European countries forbid any kind of package transport via drones , it will remain a nice tehcnological test.

  • Turns out they are using the ailerons for yaw control, I reckon the tilting wings much be on one axis - would make sense actually. 

  • I think they're using variable pitch props!

    On a larger scale aircraft such as this it's pretty vital, fixed pitch is very inefficient if compromising between hovering and forwards flight. The props are large because this thing is heavy - max takeoff weight being 14kg! 

    Notice they are also using an EDF in the back for pitch, so it's somewhat like a tricopter, though I'd imagine for yaw they tilt the wings asymmetrically. This leads me to believe they're not using cyclic.

    I heard the flight time is pretty bad though! Even so I think this is an excellent achievement! 

    Interestingly it supports swarming! They seem to be using an LTE for most of the coms, telemetry and such, and then an independent RC link. For the swarming they communicate with eachother via wifi, so I imagine the swam is ran like a LAN network connected to the internet via LTE!


  • It reads:  "A total of 130 autonomous loading and offloading cycles were ultimately performed."


    Not saying flights...

    Rob, regarding the plane, here is more Information (this was the development project for it):

    I think no collective, but an additional ducted fan (you can see it in the Video...)

  • Moderator

    @Rob I knew if I put out the bait I could catch you ;-)

  • Moderator

    all sorts of weather

    What exactly? :) 

    I did not find a detailed description of the conditions in which specific flights took place. Only common words.
    I personally do not believe that this thing will fly in windy weather. And even more to perform landing on a square 3x3 meters

  • Nice airframe.  I disagree your other comments that SLT is the way to go.  Carrying around all that weight and drag that only gets used for short period of time.

    The performance of this one however, 2kg for 8.3 km?  That's kinda weak.  Not sure if that's as good as it gets, or it was just a short haul test.  I'm not sure why you'd bother with an airplane for such a short distance.  You could even do that with quadcopter.

    I do really want to know if this thing is using cyclic pitch on the rotors during the hover phase.  There is enough room in those pods, and I can't see any other reason why they would have such large spinners otherwise, or the obviously articulated propeller grips.  If it does have cyclic pitch, it seems they took great care during the video to never show them articulating.  Why?  Just protecting secrets?  If they are using cyclic pitch, then one of the few points against helicopters (complexity, service) is negated, because this thing has not one, but two CP mechanisms.

  • Amazon.... oh I mean amazing!!

This reply was deleted.