If you haven't already posted, time is running out for public comments on regulations.gov. Please post your comments now.
http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2014-0396-0001
If you haven't already posted, time is running out for public comments on regulations.gov. Please post your comments now.
http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2014-0396-0001
You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!
Comments
"Flown within visual line of sight of a person operating the aircraft" appears to be the only part of the FAA's interpretation that can be contested.
I take "visual line of sight" to mean a specific distance from the operator beyond which the aircraft could not be seen with normal vision even when prescription eyeglasses or contact lenses are used.
I don't see how the use of FPV gear or high powered eyewhere changes this "visual line of sight" distance. For example, if you can't see your model beyond 200 feet when not using any vision augmentation then you simply don't fly your aircraft beyond that distance even if you are using FPV gear or other vision augmentation system that could let you.
Some may call this interpretation sketchy but I don't see how we can argue anything else. This is about their interpretation of an existing rule and not the time or place to discuss whether you agree with the "visual line of sight" rule. The rule is already there. Any talk about visual line of sight being an absurd requirement should be left for a separate discussion about changing the rules, instead of interpreting what is already there.
I can access http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2014-0396-0001
Understood all those points - but the total comments is still at only 3k with 2 weeks to go.
If we could get 1000 members out of the 55,000 we would be in better shape.
So, what's going on with the comment website? I could get to it last night but I can't now. Any ideas?
http://www.forbes.com/sites/gregorymcneal/2014/07/10/drone-users-la...