UK tech magazine reports that Google have bought a quad....
Hype from a manufacturer or are they playing UAS??
German article here
Fortune just reported it as well, we live in interesting times, maybe Google has enough clout to get the FAA to look at UAS use in the USA.
Comments
The FAA's current policy is based on whether the unmanned aircraft is used as a public aircraft, civil aircraft or as a model aircraft.
The policy for UAS operations is that no person may operate a UAS in the National Airspace System without specific authority.
For UAS operating as public aircraft the authority is the COA, for UAS operating as civil aircraft the authority is special airworthiness certificates, and for model aircraft the authority is AC 91-57.
AC 91-57 restricts operation to “visual line-of-site” and non-business use.
Further, many of the radio frequencies on which we operate are restricted to non-commercial use by FCC regs.
will have to listen to those, thanks for the links - just out of curiosity, what is NAS?
Amazing how over time this site becomes quite a resource!!
just seems like unnecessary govt regulation. do you have to register any and all r/c aircraft since they could be capable of surveillance or only if you have fpv/photo equipment on board? how broad is the law? seems it could get pricey if you have quite a few models. also, is it £106/yr or a 1x fee?
bob
The rules were not amended because of Merseyside, they were always going to be. Merseyside got themselves into trouble by touting the first ever arrest of somebody using the FLIR from there smaller Microdrone and then the CAA got in touch and reminded them that the law had changed in January and they were in breach of it cos they never applied for an operators licence. I believe that particular crim got off because the manner of arrest was not lawful!! The operators licence costs £106 and you just need to meet some simple things if your aircraft is sub 20kg,
wow if this is true :(