From Ars Technica. I played with ion drives a long time ago, but never got anything this large to lift. Great work!

The Johnson Indoor Track at MIT probably won't go down in history in the same way as Kitty Hawk has, but it was the scene of a first in powered flight. A team of researchers has managed to build the first aircraft powered by an ionic wind, a propulsion system that requires no moving parts. While the flight took place using a small drone, the researchers' calculations suggest that the efficiency of the design would double simply by building a larger craft.

Ionic wind

In conventional aircraft, air is pushed around by moving parts, either propellers or the turbines within jet engines. But we've known for a while that it's also possible to use electrical fields to push air around.

The challenge is that air is largely made of uncharged molecules that don't respond to electric fields. But at sufficiently high voltages, it's possible to ionize the nitrogen and oxygen that make up our atmosphere, just as lightning does all the time. The electrons that are liberated speed away, collide with other molecules, and ionize some of them as well. If this takes place in an electric field, all those ions will start moving to the appropriate electrode. In the process, they'll collide with neutral molecules and push them along. The resulting bulk movement of atmospheric molecules is called an ionic wind.

Calculations done decades ago, however, suggested that it wasn't possible to generate a practical amount of thrust using an ionic wind. Given advances in batteries, electronics, and materials, however, a team from MIT decided the time may have come to revisit the issue.

Doing so requires navigating a large series of trade-offs. For example, the lower the electric field strength of an ionic wind drive, the more thrust you get for a given power. Of course, if you drop the field strength enough, nothing will get ionized in the first place. Since the thrust per unit area is small, a more extensive thruster system makes sense—other than the fact that it will add to the drag and slow the craft down.

Still, after playing around with different thruster designs, the researchers found that it should be possible to generate sufficient thrust to get something airborne: "This level of performance suggested that steady-level flight of a fixed-wing unmanned aircraft might be feasible but at the limit of what is technologically possible using current materials and power electronics technology."

Finding a balance

The design they chose has a thin wire as its leading edge, where nitrogen and oxygen get ionized. Trailing behind that is a thin airfoil covered by the second electrode. This can both provide a little additional lift and allow the generation of an electric field that accelerates the ionized molecules from the wire to the foil.

But this design had to be integrated with the battery and electronics that make it work, as well as the wing and body that turned the whole thing into an aircraft. Some of those ingredients weren't even available until the team set to designing them.

"Weight constraints necessitated the design and construction of both a custom battery stack and a custom high-voltage power converter," the researchers write, "which stepped up the battery voltage to 40 kilovolts." To handle the aircraft's body, they fed a computer algorithm with a list of their constraints and had it optimize these to allow for stable flight with a limit on the potential wingspan.

The resulting hardware included a five-meter wing with a thin body containing the battery and electronics suspended below it before trailing off to a tail. On either side of the body, hanging off the wing, was a series of the wire/airfoil ionizers (two rows from front to back, both in a column of four for a total of eight). The whole thing weighed just under 2.5kg.

Views: 1380

Comment by Rana on November 21, 2018 at 6:03pm

It's totally un-conventional and highly appreciable thinking behind the design ! However there is implication for aviation as the high voltage charge would certainly creat serious problem with the high voltage charge on the clouds.

Comment by Laser Developer on November 21, 2018 at 11:09pm

Freaking awesome! Having seen what the Dawn mission did with an ion drive this is fantastic technology for the future even if it's only used in space.

Comment by Andreas Gazis on November 21, 2018 at 11:52pm

Awesome! Once the underlying electronics become off the shelf we 'll also get ion drive hair dryers, vacuum cleaners and fans.

Comment by Mateusz Sadowski on November 22, 2018 at 10:15am

Wow. That's great! Thanks for sharing! Once again I'll allow myself to link to a DIYDrones post in https://weeklyrobotics.com :)

Comment by Jack Crossfire on November 23, 2018 at 11:40pm

Remember dreaming about ion powered airplanes as a kid. By the time we discovered lifters 20 years ago, years of physics classes had killed the magic.  The limit is the voltage at which air arcs.  They don't blast ions & electrons out the back like a spaceship.  The friction of the ions against neutral air pushes neutral air out the back.  The ions are basically a turbine made out of air, so why not use a turbine?


Developer
Comment by John Arne Birkeland on November 24, 2018 at 8:44am

To bad the available power to weight ratio is going to be problematic for any practical applications.

Comment

You need to be a member of DIY Drones to add comments!

Join DIY Drones

Season Two of the Trust Time Trial (T3) Contest 
A list of all T3 contests is here. The current round, the Vertical Horizontal one, is here

© 2018   Created by Chris Anderson.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service