Part Two: Here is the original picture of the finished product:
This is the second part of a 2-part series on 'How to build a High-Definition FPV UAV using a Raspberry PI with HD camera, using a high speed WiFi link.
In my first post on the subject (located here), I discussed the parts I used, and how to install them into a Hobby King Go-Discover FPV model.
In this post, I will discuss installing the Raspberry PI and the PI camera in the Go-Discover gimbals, and the software configuration for both the Raspberry PI and the ground station PC.
From the previous post, step 3 was completed by installing the Ubiquity Rocket M5 in the model. Now onto step 4:
Step 4: Install the Raspberry PI and PI Camera
Here is a photo of the position of the PI in the Go-Discover model:
The PI fits nicely just behind the camera gimbals, with the USB and HDMI ports on top. In the right side you can see the Cat5 network cable attached. This cable connects to the ethernet switch, which is also connected to the Rocket M5 input port.
The two cables shown on top are the servo control wires for the gimbals, which I have directly connected to channel 4 and 5 on my radio. I am using channel 4 (normally the rudder stick on my radio. Since there is no rudder on a flying wing, this is a convenient channel to use to move left and right with the camera. I have not (yet) moved to a head tracker, but if you already have that setup, just assign the channels accordingly.
To install the PI camera, remove the stock plate from the gimbals (for a GoPro), and mount the PI camera as shown in this photo:
The PI camera case fits very nicely into the slot, and again I used a small piece of velcro to hold it down. You could use a couple of small screws instead if you want a more secure hold. The two gimbals servos are also shown here. They are simple to install, just follow the Go-Discover instructions.
Here is a front view of the PI camera installed:
Here is the block diagram describing all the connections:
Some comments on my previous post suggested that it is possible to eliminate the ethernet switch and serial-to-ethernet converter using the Raspberry PI and a serial port on the PI. I believe this post describes how to talk to the PI via the NavLink, but in this case, I want to use the PI to bridge the connection from the ground station to the APM/PixHawk. Somebody please comment on this if you know more about it. I believe it would require a TCP/IP to serial link from the PI to the telemetry port on the APM, and some software on the PI to act as the bridge. The main connection to the ground station is via the Rocket M5 and TCP/IP, not through a telemetry link (900 Mhz or Zigbee like I used on my other models).
Step 5: Getting it all to work with software configuration (the really fun part starts now).
Check out this post on what others have done with streaming and the PI. My experiments showed that using GStreamer on both the PI and on Windows gives really good results with very low latency, if you use the right parameters.
Get GStreamer on the PI by following this blog. This is the same version of GStreamer that I am using on my setup.
Make sure your PI camera works ok by plugging in the PI to a standard monitor using the HDMI port and follow the instructions on the Raspberry PI website on how to get the camera up and running (without GStreamer). Once you have a working PI and camera, you can then proceed to stream things over the network.
Note: It is suggested that you first get the PI streaming video by plugging it directly into your local network where you can also connect your ground station PC with the correct IP addresses (without the Rocket M5). For my PI, I picked 192.168.1.2, and for the ground station, 192.168.1.1. Make sure you can ping the PI from your PC and the PC from the PI.
For streaming, you will also have to make sure all the ports you intent to use are open on the firewall (described later).
For the ground station PC, you can download GStreamer here. Make sure when you install, select to install everything , or full installation (not the default).
Here is the command I use for the PI to pipe the camera output to GStreamer:
raspivid -t 0 -w 1280 -h 720 -fps 30 -b 1700000 -o - | gst-launch1.0 -v fdsrc ! h264parse config-interval=1 ! rtph264pay ! udpsink host = 192.168.1.1 port= 9000
The command is explained as follows:
raspivid is the command to start the camera capture on the PI. The -w switch is for the width in pixels, and the -h switch is for the height. In this case, I am using 1280 X 720, but you can try any combination that fits your needs.
The -b switch is the bit rate for the sampling. In this case I chose 1.7mbs to send over the stream. Again you can experiment with higher or lower values. This settings seems to work good for me, and the latency is almost unnoticeable.
the "-o - |" is piping the output to gstreamer. Make sure you include the dash before the pipe "|" symbol.
For the GStreamer command, all the filters are separated with an exclamation point "!", as these are individual drivers that are part of GStreamer. Since the PI has hardware accelerated video, the output is in a format called "H264", which is a highly-compressed stream. The GStreamer filters are configured to transport the output via a UDP socket connection to the target PC. Notice the 'udpsink' element which specifies the host - in this case your ground station, and the UDP port. I am using port 9000, but you can use any open port on your system, but be sure to open the firewall or it won't work! You can also use TCP instead of UDP, but for such a data stream, I chose to use UDP since dropouts are certainly possible, and with UDP this is ok, but with TCP, you could have socket problems and higher latency.
Note: to get the PI to execute this command on boot, make a shell script with the above command and add it to your local.rc boot sequence. That way when the PI boots, you get the stream without having to log into the PI remotely.
For the ground station PC, once you have installed GStreamer and opened the correct ports, use this command (from the command prompt) to view the stream:
c:\gstreamer\1.0\x86_64\bin\gst-launch-1.0 udpsrc port=9000 ! application/x-rtp,encoding-name=H264,payload=96 ! rtph264depay ! avdec_h264 ! videoconvert ! autovideosink
If all goes well, you should see the PI camera output on your PC screen in a popup window. For those of you what want to use FPV goggles, you can connect to the HDMI port on your PC to display the output if your goggles support HDMI.
I have this command in a batch file (with a PAUSE) statement at the end to keep the window open.
WHEW! If you got this far, you are amazing.
The last step to complete the build is to connect to the APM from mission planner. The method I used to connect was to install a utility that converts a TCP connection to a virtual serial port, but I also think that directly connecting the mission planner to the TCP port will also work, however I have not tried it. I will post back later after trying it.
Here is the link to setup the serial to ethernet device to have an IP address and port.
Here is the link to the configuration utility for installing the virtual serial port.
Once you have a serial connection over TCP/IP working to the APM, you should be able to connect with Mission Planner. On the maiden flight, it worked perfectly, and I didn't see a single drop in the telemetry data or anything noticeable in the video transmission, however my first flight was limited to 2km.
The last step is to connect the Rocket M5 to the Nano M5 and test everything using the OTA (over the air) connection. If all is well, you are ready to fly! But be careful on your maiden, you just spent $700.
Finally, here is a photo of my Antenna Tracker with the Nano M5 attached. My next update will include a video of a longer flight.
Happy Flying!
Comments
@bocorps - no over the wifi link. I am running 720 X 576 just to conserve a bit of bandwidth. With VLC the delay is quite noticeable and is about 1 second however FFMPlay drops it to under 200ms - I think it is between 100 and 200ms over my 2.4Ghz MikroTik link. Mind you I have managed to sell most of my gear now as one large house owner wanted wifi all over his property so no he has it almost down to the local shops.
If I use H.264 with Derek Malloy's implementation then the latency increases however the bandwidth is less than half at 3M for 1920X1080. MPEG 1920X1080 uses about 25M however is quite low latency.
@John - thanks - when I get another one I will give it a go. I must have not used enough force. How far did you get with your MikroTik setup? I got 4km with mine in testing. I managed to get the 3G backup link working as well however it was not reliable enough.
@bocorps - I got under 100ms latency with my C920. The key is to use FFMPlay on the PC as it is MUCH faster than VLC.
@John Rambo, are you having issues with the Rocket M5 setup, or some other WiFi? Last test I did was at 1.5 miles and I had no dropouts to notice. When you say 'short range' what do you mean? There is more overhead with TCP so it could increase latency. I don't have the data to compare, but something worth doing.
@patrick, I've tried udp stream over my 5ghz wifi, even at short range it was a nightmare. TCP is definalely the way to go, otherwise you'll be dealing with lots of artifacts. Also, I've seen successful attempts to use logitech c900 webcam (usb, native h264) 4on rbpi. Don't know about the delay, unfortunately.
@bocorps
The h264 camera is a raw data stream, which you would need to get to UDP socket stream to go over the WIFi link, which is the reason for the PI/Gstreamer to encode the h264 over the network. A webcam that has UDP/TCP network ability could be used, but the latency is the issue. If anybody can find one with low network latency, you could eliminate the PI.
The biggest problem as I see it with those security cameras are latency. The cameras I have looked at have at least 200ms latency according to the manufacturer. Though I have only contacted a few manufacturers and it might be that there are cameras with better latency out there but hardly for a reasonable price.
Also I suspect that they are optimized for a scene where most of it is static and will not perform very well on a UAV where everything moves all the time.
@bocorps
I don't have experience with either solution yet, but since all we are trying to do is expose a serial port to ethernet, it seems like a simple solution is the better one. I think mav-link is more complex, but I need to investigate to understand more about it. We don't need any logging on the PI, just a pass-through.
@bocorps, that's the same board and software I am using and it seems to work fine. Mission Planner can connect directly to the board using UDP, or you can use a ethernet-to-serial virtual port.
Seems like ser2net is all that's needed. What does MavProxy do otherwise?
Ser2net doesn't support UDP. Using UDP you don't get the latency problem you get with the Ser2net.
-
45
-
46
-
47
-
48
-
49
of 61 Next