University of Glasgow MAST Lab entry to the iMechE Unmanned Aerial Systems Grand Challenge 2014/2015.

The Unmanned Aircraft Systems Challenge (UAS Challenge) bridges the gap between academia and industry in developing applied UAS-related activities.


We designed an H quadrotor that was capable to carry 1 kilogram of flour, do waypoint navigation and drop the payload in a designated area.

This particular vehicle was done using 3D printed parts, and carbon fibre rods, the video explains more about it.


We used Pixhawk as flight controller and a Raspberry Pi 2 as companion computer. Several scripts in python were done to send commands via serial port to the pixhawk, Drone API was used on the RPI 2.

The vehicle flew perfectly in manual and in autonomous mode, several tests were performed. The rpi2 / pixhawk combo is a great way to do UAS applications like this one, and this is a living proof of it.

We had 3 ways of communicating with the vehicle:

- Standard RC 

- 3DR radios (900mhz) 

- 2.4ghz Wifi high gain antennas using SSH to the RPI 2 and then to the Pixhawk 

Important to notice that we also had an RTSP video server using the RPI camera with 0.5 seconds delay, HD and 30 fps... It worked great. 

Our payload mechanism was extremely simple yet very practical and useful, 3D printed as well and fully tested, the video will show that ;)


Tools like the SITL simulator was really helpful to test our scripts before doing them on the actual vehicle, special thanks to the developers that are making this tools easily accesible to us, in Tridge we trust!!! 



You might be thinking about how well we did... The vehicle worked great, we passed scrutiny very easily and it was airworthy after just adding some padding for the lipos. The problem was later, a manual test was needed before doing the automatic mission, and it must be flown by a certified pilot...

Currently in the MAST Lab we don't have a certified pilot, so iMechE provided the certified pilot for our vehicle, and as many of you know, every vehicle is different... and being a prototype, even more. The problem is that he did not had chance to practice before doing the actual flight... the vehicle took off, and like at 40 centimeters it pitched super aggressively and the tip of the vehicle touched the ground and it flip, that was it. 


That particular part was not in our spare list and our 3D printer was 500 miles away in Glasgow (ergo the last song in the video, duhhhh). Oh, by the way, we have a Makerbot Replicator 2.

Anyhow, we had lots of fun, we learned a lot and most of all it was super fun. 


In the picture above you can the one of the motor mounts (blue one) which is the one that did not endure the flip.

Sorry for the long post and let me know what do you think of our vehicle. Any questions, please do ask.


E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!

Join diydrones


  • nice 1 lads... good to see other Scots getting together & building something awesome!..

  • Developer

    Congratulations Team Glasgow. Well done and commiserations on the crash by a third party.  A huge amount will have been learnt generally by the team.

  • Great effort guys, 

    Really sorry to see you get sidelined by a well meaning but obviously misguided necessity to use a pilot who had no idea at all how to fly your vehicle.

    Sometimes the rules are the problem.

    Best Regards,


  • Thanks Chris! 

    We used DroneKit, the challenge was last week, it worked great, our code is also opensource in case someone want to use it, we did some nice functions to check if the vehicle arrived the location safely, takeoff, and so forth. At the beginning we were going to use the RPI2 to do some computer vision to do a precision approach to the landing zone, but iMechE remove that requisite and then no computer vision was needed, but we kept the rpi to do ssh and hit an enter to start the mission. Pixhawk by itself was sufficient to complete the entire mission. 

  • 3D Robotics

    Great post and really well documented effort.  Love the use of DroneAPI. Would you have used DroneKit (which is really just an extension of DroneAPI) if it had been available then?

This reply was deleted.