Came across this from an FAA pilot exam training program:
"Question: May a recreational pilot act as pilot in command of an aircraft in furtherance of a business?
ANSWER: No, it is not allowed.
Recreational pilots may not act as pilot in command of an aircraft that is used in furtherance of a business. There is no exception." (Bolding mine, DB)"
Note the phrase "furtherance of a business", that includes a plethora of things such as advertising, product demonstrations and even product placement or use in a movie or TV show.
While this is referring to private vs commercial manned aircraft, this could be applied (via precedent) to differentiate commercial vs recreational as it pertains to (s)UAS uses, pilots and vehicles.
Comments
Zak, Does the FAA make a distinction between recreational and commercial use of kites?
Is the kite being used to further a business?
Ramon, It comes down what the FAA considers "commercial" to seperate recreational and commercial sUAS, the FAA considers "commercial" as any "furtherance of a business".
Very much a current issue here. Even now, in the USA, people are still using recreational sUAS guidance to slip commercial use past the FAA. That was the whole problem that started the FAA involvement in the first place.
"this is referring to private vs commercial manned aircraft" more clear it cant be.....