Replies

    • Thanks for the clarification. Those Artemen boards are fantastic. ULRS is really moving along now. Next up will be the all in one JR board with Bluetooth. I funded this first batch to move things along. I cannot understand why HK does not start making them. 

    Paul Atherton said:



    Paul Atherton said:



    Marc Dornan said:

    No worries. Did not realize you had the Wolfbox units. I will see if I can open a request with OpenTx devs tonight. It seems to me to be an easy change.

    Cheers Marc. I agree, an easy change. Was trying to get my head around the FrSky telem libraries mentioned in your earlier post. They look interesting, but not exactly sure how the polling thing would be implemented in the setup we are using. Looks like its required from the decoder end (would usually be done by the Tx unit), as it mentions s.port being a 'pull' protocol. I maybe need to look again when I have more free time. Good find though! Its incredible how resourceful the RC community is. Its great to be a part of it.

    Thanks again, Paul

    p.s. those Artemen boards look awesome!

    Marc, forgot to mention - the Teensy code actually is using those libraries you referred to earlier and it does use the sensor polling call mentioned in the article - so it already does the polling (from the encoder side). Cheers

  • Not without doing a conversion in the lua script
  • I've look around and can't find the answer to whether there is a way to change the Units displayed on the Taranis for altitude and speed from metric to imperial?

    Thanks

  • Hello ! I would like



  • Paul Atherton said:



    Marc Dornan said:

    No worries. Did not realize you had the Wolfbox units. I will see if I can open a request with OpenTx devs tonight. It seems to me to be an easy change.

    Cheers Marc. I agree, an easy change. Was trying to get my head around the FrSky telem libraries mentioned in your earlier post. They look interesting, but not exactly sure how the polling thing would be implemented in the setup we are using. Looks like its required from the decoder end (would usually be done by the Tx unit), as it mentions s.port being a 'pull' protocol. I maybe need to look again when I have more free time. Good find though! Its incredible how resourceful the RC community is. Its great to be a part of it.

    Thanks again, Paul

    p.s. those Artemen boards look awesome!

    Marc, forgot to mention - the Teensy code actually is using those libraries you referred to earlier and it does use the sensor polling call mentioned in the article - so it already does the polling (from the encoder side). Cheers



  • Marc Dornan said:

    No worries. Did not realize you had the Wolfbox units. I will see if I can open a request with OpenTx devs tonight. It seems to me to be an easy change.

    Cheers Marc. I agree, an easy change. Was trying to get my head around the FrSky telem libraries mentioned in your earlier post. They look interesting, but not exactly sure how the polling thing would be implemented in the setup we are using. Looks like its required from the decoder end (would usually be done by the Tx unit), as it mentions s.port being a 'pull' protocol. I maybe need to look again when I have more free time. Good find though! Its incredible how resourceful the RC community is. Its great to be a part of it.

    Thanks again, Paul

    p.s. those Artemen boards look awesome!

  • No worries. Did not realize you had the Wolfbox units. I will see if I can open a request with OpenTx devs tonight. It seems to me to be an easy change.

  • Marc, I don't think it's solely sensor polling to get that solution working. I think there would have to be some changes in opentx also as presently it only listens to telemetry input on the external bay input if D16 is selected and a bind is in place. I think to have it accepting data on the s.port pin with Ppm input selected, we would need changes in Opentx.

    Very kind of you to offer the OrangeRX units. To be fair, I'm doing OK with the Wolf box units just now, and don't see me using ULRS outside of my fx-61 wing, although that might change so will definitely bear your offer in mind. Cheers, Paul
  • @Paul A I have some modified OrangeRX modules (voltage boosted for 1W) output that have been tested. I now have better boards for ULRS (form factorwise anyway). PM me and I can donate them to you if you are still looking for some ULRS action. And maybe you can figure out how to integrate sensor polling into the Teensy so we can do away with X receiver relaying.

  • @Paul Atherton. I am using ULRS now and looking to use it exclusively. But I still really want the Mavlink telemetry on my Taranis. I understand that sensor polling is is why we need an X series receiver and cannot use a Teensy on on the ground side and hence have to relay with an X series receiver. Have you seen that pawelsky on RCGroups has now created a data polling in his S Port sensor encoding classes that run on a Teensy. http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2245978

    It strikes me that we can now use a Teensy on the ground side in the JR port of a Taranis instead of using a repeater. I think this may be the Holy Grail for me. I have six of these (mini ULRS with USB designed by Artemen). 

    3702286702?profile=original

    I will have a go at this but you might find this easier than I to merge into the existing project. 

    If we could get this working this could also be used with a Dragonlink V3 or even with a regular 3DR Sic radio.

This reply was deleted.

Activity

DIY Robocars via Twitter
Apr 27
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Apr 27
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @f1tenth: Sliding (autonomously) into the weekend like ... 🤖😎 #f1tenth #robots #AutonomousVehicles @OpenRoboticsOrg @NVIDIAEmbedded @Aut…
Apr 25
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @chr1sa: One of the problems with autonomous car racing is that watching software drive is not a very exciting spectator sport. To help…
Apr 25
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @SmallpixelCar: Replaced AGX Xavier with @NVIDIAEmbedded Jetson Xavier NX. Now both cars look fast and clean https://t.co/jlcoY2EjZf
Apr 25
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @chr1sa: Yesterday we had a record number of competitors (36) in our monthly @DIYRobocars virtual autonomous car race. We kept it going…
Apr 25
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Apr 16
DIY Drones via Twitter
RT @chr1sa: After more than a year of only virtual races, @DIYRobocars returns to the newly renovated @circuitlaunch on May 22 for the resu…
Apr 11
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @DAVGtech: And now available with LiDAR 🔥 https://twitter.com/Heavy02011/status/1381137016381964293
Apr 11
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @Heavy02011: #VirtualRaceLeague: @DIYRobocars Race #9 - #ParkingLotNerds #thunderhillracetrack, CA Join us for the next race April 24th,…
Apr 11
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @DWalmroth: Weather's finally cooperating, looking forward to racing 1:10 scale autonomous cars outdoors again! @diyrobocars, @NVIDIAEm…
Apr 7
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @AIDRI_: I finally succeeded in optimizing the trajectory and speed of a car on a #racetrack. Next step: implement a 2d controller and…
Apr 7
DIY Robocars via Twitter
@jetdillo @circuitlaunch Actually the second *in person* event in a year. We do virtual races every month
Apr 2
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Update: we're moving it back one day to Sunday (the 4th) at 11:00am instead
Apr 2
DIY Robocars via Twitter
@GrantEMoe @circuitlaunch Update: we're doing it on Sunday (4th) at 11:00am instead
Apr 2
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @chr1sa: Maybe we should have a mini @DIYRobocars race in our lower school's playground https://t.co/xLFeua1R6X
Mar 29
More…