AutoPilot Glider(no motor) Released at 5000 Feet 2 miles from landing location...

How would you setup the glider to land at this location such that it maximizes it's glide slope?

This is the glider that is planned to be used

http://www.carlgoldbergproducts.com/airplanes/gpma1959.html

You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!

Join diydrones

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • There are several pretty good discussions on the v2.67 thread that are relevant.  One part discusses airspeed control and that the code isn't really flexible enough now to handle gliders.  My observation here is that there's a flag in defines.h that covers what attitude.pde does for pitch control, but instead of fully testing this I just changed attitude.pde to ONLY do airspeed control and set gains accordingly.  I've progressed past my current UAV testing to set gains for my next flight.  In other words, I think it's hard wired right now not to do airspeed control. But, look at the code and the 2.67 release thread on the forum.  The other big elephant is also discussed in the 2.67 thread related to temperature compensation for the accelerometers.  Personally I don't see several degrees of misalignment as an issue since we're closed loop, but I'm more worried about temperature compensation for the gyros and/or how the DCM aiding reacts to observed drift rates of 30 deg/sec.  I saw drift rates grow to 30 degrees/sec in freezer testing, but luckily attitudes were still good.  Who knows what happens when dynamics are introduced.   I have also noted that current methods in AP_aprs.dcm are simplified.  Not to get into too much detail here, but there may be issues if the plane is suspended from the tail.  Don't quite know yet.  What I do know is that there is an assumption that the body attitude is co-incident with the velocity vector for GPS aiding; and, this is done when the ground speed goes over a fairly small threshold.  In a HAB flight velocity vector and body attitude are not aligned while under the balloon.  This part is fairly easily fixed in SW.  My current code only uses GPS aiding (in AP_APRS.cpp) after the drop occurs. 

    I have information and post flight root cause and corrective action + flight data posted on my blog for NTNS-2.   My progress to NTNS-3 is going fairly well and I'm doing HIL with Flight Gear to verify recent changes.   Almost forgot.  If you're using the UBLOX LEA-6 GPS v2.67 has a bug that "sometimes" initializes such that HAB altitudes are not supported.  Best to wait until this is fixed before attempting a flight.

    Regards,

    Larry G

  • The real goal is to drop the glider from 100,000 feet from a range of almost 100 miles to return to launch site.

    The reason for this is to test it in a vacuum and confirm it can mange the low pressure and strong wind sheers. 

  • I have also wondered this. How the APM would react if its not getting to were it needs to be. But by controlling the decent rate of the airplane and controlling the airspeed. I wonder what would actually happen. I have a airplane that is chomping at the bit to try this. I just have a bad feeling about what would happen. I don't mind crashing a couple planes, but I would like to keep my electronics.
  • Hi,

    With that floater and the 2 to 1 glide ratio, I'd say that the APM will fly slow and straight to the destination. A not so windy day will help.

This reply was deleted.

Activity

DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @TinkerGen_: "The Tinkergen MARK ($199) is my new favorite starter robocar. It’s got everything — computer vision, deep learning, sensor…
Monday
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Monday
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @roboton_io: Join our FREE Sumo Competition 🤖🏆 👉 https://roboton.io/ranking/vsc2020 #sumo #robot #edtech #competition #games4ed https://t.co/WOx…
Nov 16
DIY Drones via Twitter
First impressions of Tinkergen MARK robocar https://ift.tt/36IeZHc
Nov 16
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Our review of the @TinkerGen_ MARK robocar, which is the best on the market right now https://diyrobocars.com/2020/11/15/first-impressions-of-tinkergen-mark-robocar/ https://t.co/ENIlU5SfZ2
Nov 15
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @Ingmar_Stapel: I have now explained the OpenBot project in great detail on my blog with 12 articles step by step. I hope you enjoy read…
Nov 15
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @DAVGtech: This is a must attend. Click the link, follow link to read the story, sign up. #chaos2020 #digitalconnection #digitalworld ht…
Nov 15
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @a1k0n: Got a new chassis for outdoor races (hobbyking Quantum Vandal) but I totally didn't expect that it might cause problems for my g…
Nov 11
DIY Drones via Twitter
First impressions of the Intel OpenBot https://ift.tt/36qkVV4
Nov 10
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Nov 9
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Excellent use of cardboard instead of 3D printing! https://twitter.com/Ingmar_Stapel/status/1324960595318333441
Nov 7
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @chr1sa: We've got a record 50 teams competing in this month's @DIYRobocars @donkey_car virtual AI car race. Starting today at 10:00am…
Nov 7
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Nov 6
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @a1k0n: Car's view, using a fisheye camera. The ceiling light tracking algorithm gave me some ideas to improve ConeSLAM, and having grou…
Nov 5
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @a1k0n: To get ground truth I measured the rug, found the pixel coordinates of its corners, calibrated my phone camera with my standard…
Nov 5
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @a1k0n: @DIYRobocars is back in December, but outside. Time to reinvestigate ConeSLAM! I rigged up a quick and dirty ground-truth captur…
Nov 5
More…