Hi All,

I have flown my quad 12 times now, using the stock pid param as per 3.2.1

I get ~25min per flight with small HD Tube nose-mounted FPV cam.

I now want to attempt Auto-tune to optimize the rig.

 I don't think I am experienced enough to do PID tuning manually.

However, I read somewhere around that Auto-tune can fail on bigger, heavier quads, with low kv motors.

My build is based on the Tarot 650 Sport Quad Frame (X-config)

FC - PixHawk (3.2.1)

Motors - Tarot 4114  320kv    

Props - CF 1550

ESC - HobbyWing Xrotor 40A

Batt - 8AH 6S

AUW : 3kg

1) I would like to know if Auto-tune can be done successfully on this build.

2) Do you recommend that I first upgrade to 3.3.3

Thank you for your valuable comments.



Cape Town, South Africa


You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!

Join diydrones

Email me when people reply –


                • Yes i will as soon as i get a chance to fly its been horrible weather these days in Canada. For pics pls PM me. 

                  • Weather near perfect in Sunny Australia

                • Hi Gerhard

                  To perform autotune you must have the following. In alt hold mode and the throttle at or very close to 50%. If the throttle is not 50% autotune wont start. I recommend you perform the 3 axis autotune one at a time. This is set in Mission planner. You will be surprised at the autotune perimeter results. My X8 flys great after autotune. Very Happy

                  Cheers Henny 

          • Also i have the same ESC and i never failed auto tune. I have the same frame but different motors 380 KV from tarot. 

  • Hi All,

    Thank you for your valuable input re ATun etc.

    Steps I am going to take includes -

    Upgrade to latest stable FW

    After setting the default params and fly in stbz m

    Fly in AltH to record frame vibes.

    If this is within the params, I am going to attempt ATun.

    I will keep you posted on my progress.

    Once again, thank you DIY.



    Cape Town

  • what exactly are your concern, and what is it based on ? - untested sync issues in your motors/ESC's or the tuning loop itself ?

    • Hi Andre,

       I have no experience with pixhawk FC,  this is in fact the first for me into the UAV-tech.

      I realize that most forum-users are highly-experienced already the PixHawk and

      UAVs in general.  Hence me touching base on others' experience and advise.

      So, it is not that I am having problems, I just need some confirmation from the forum

       that auto-tune is suitable for my particular set-up, prior to doing ATun.

      IMHO  the  construction and components are well-placed and mounted properly.

       The Vibes Graph appear to be within acceptable limits, as I interpret it.

      Currently, I am using the default PID's as per 3.2.1.

      I have tested > AltH, PosH, Loiter, RTL, Land > The R&P sticks appears to be

      responsive, so I deem it ' working ok ', but maybe not optimized.

      e.g. > In PosH, light tumble breeze, it is not really solid in the air though, drifting of position.

      I recon it is because the FC flight params eg PIDs has not been optimized? 

      I don't want to adjust the PIDs manually at this time.

      since I don't have enough experience to 'understand' how bad, or good, my adjustment would

      render the craft. (At the same time I am apprehensive that, by doing manual adjustment, via MP, then Try and Fly, I may damage the rig during flying, which, for me was an expensive build

      and most of the frame parts are not available locally ) For me rather baby-steps....

      I googled several vid/advice re PID adjustment how-to's

      Received valuable input from others on the forum.

      Read the wiki on ATun

      At this time, since I lack experience and confidence to do a manual PID tuning, I am opting for ATun.

      So this will be my next step.

      Just to confirm -

      1) I assume one have to do ATun in rather windless conditions?

      2) Can one do it in a big hall where there is no wind?

      3) From my understanding,  ATun does not make use of the GPS, thus 2)

      4) Since I am on 3.2.1 would you recommend me to upgrade to the latest stable FW 3.3.3?? prior to ATun

      In a perfect world I would have liked to make contact with a local fellow-hobbyist in my area whom

      I can contact and touch sides with, but at this time my current resources are DIY forums, the wiki,

      and the like, to learn and explore the interesting world of UAV.

      Anyway, thank you for your comments and interest in my posting here.



      Cape Town, South Africa

      • 1: yes, little to no is best, as long it's not turbulent and just steady, a few m/s is fine.

        2: depending on size of hall and UAV, you will always generate your own airflow in there after a while, and have less space - and no GPS.

        3: no autotune is done in alt-hold mode, it's not using GPS position in the traditional way, but uses it for AHRS, read and do as http://ardupilot.org/copter/docs/indoor-flying.html says if flying indoors.

        4: yes, do upgrade. - and read all releasenotes for each version between (https://github.com/diydrones/ardupilot/blob/master/ArduCopter/Relea...)

        Indoor Flying Guidelines — Copter documentation
This reply was deleted.


DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @a1k0n: @SmallpixelCar @diyrobocars It's just something that's easy to track with chroma keying. I ended up using different colors on th…
4 hours ago
DIY Robocars via Twitter
4 hours ago
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @TinkerGen_: "The Tinkergen MARK ($199) is my new favorite starter robocar. It’s got everything — computer vision, deep learning, sensor…
Nov 23
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Nov 23
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @roboton_io: Join our FREE Sumo Competition 🤖🏆 👉 https://roboton.io/ranking/vsc2020 #sumo #robot #edtech #competition #games4ed https://t.co/WOx…
Nov 16
DIY Drones via Twitter
First impressions of Tinkergen MARK robocar https://ift.tt/36IeZHc
Nov 16
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Our review of the @TinkerGen_ MARK robocar, which is the best on the market right now https://diyrobocars.com/2020/11/15/first-impressions-of-tinkergen-mark-robocar/ https://t.co/ENIlU5SfZ2
Nov 15
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @Ingmar_Stapel: I have now explained the OpenBot project in great detail on my blog with 12 articles step by step. I hope you enjoy read…
Nov 15
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @DAVGtech: This is a must attend. Click the link, follow link to read the story, sign up. #chaos2020 #digitalconnection #digitalworld ht…
Nov 15
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @a1k0n: Got a new chassis for outdoor races (hobbyking Quantum Vandal) but I totally didn't expect that it might cause problems for my g…
Nov 11
DIY Drones via Twitter
First impressions of the Intel OpenBot https://ift.tt/36qkVV4
Nov 10
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Nov 9
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Excellent use of cardboard instead of 3D printing! https://twitter.com/Ingmar_Stapel/status/1324960595318333441
Nov 7
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @chr1sa: We've got a record 50 teams competing in this month's @DIYRobocars @donkey_car virtual AI car race. Starting today at 10:00am…
Nov 7
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Nov 6
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @a1k0n: Car's view, using a fisheye camera. The ceiling light tracking algorithm gave me some ideas to improve ConeSLAM, and having grou…
Nov 5