I'm looking for advice on a few things, it's a long story so I'll start at the beginning:  The Engineering Club at my college wants to launch a high-altitude (AKA weather, sounding) balloon with a payload of cameras, etc. to go up to hopefully ~100,000 ft. and take some video.  A lot of people have done this, so we wanted to try something a bit different.  Usually it's done just with a sealed foam box attached to a parachute, with the top of the parachute attached to a line running to the balloon.  When the balloon bursts from the inevitable air pressure change, the round parachute carries the payload to the ground - to god knows where.  Lately people put a GPS device with radio of some sort - ie, cell phone - to make retrieval easier.  But if the payload ends up landing in an inconvenient place, such as a large body of water, the top of a tree, or if the parachute fails - you've lost your stuff.  Often the payloads do get lost, so people tend to send up cheap cameras and accept the risk.

Since we're both on a budget and want to do something different, we'd like to have a second parachute open at somewhere under 40,000 ft. - a ram-air parachute, with a controller and servos inside the payload able to guide it towards GPS coordinates.  Since some payloads end up in the ocean, etc., any distance closer to a decided location would be helpful.  The guided parachute could potentially be a powered paraglider, if adding a prop doesn't complicate things too much.

We're also planning on building a quadrotor which can be used, among other things, to test the parachute / powered paraglider.  I have those plans pretty much laid out but if you have some suggestions, links I could use them.

Any advice about the UAV paraglider + balloon would be appreciated, thanks

You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!

Join diydrones

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • have you worked out what paraglider design you wish to use. I am a paragliding pilot and the biggest problem we have is cloud suck. and for your deployment idea I would strongly recommend a D bag system. the largest problem is line overs and twist. once the wing is up and going pitch control will be a problem and getting the software to work that out. also as a point our glide ratio on my mistral 6. is only 1:9. best paraglider I have seen is 1:12. I know hang gliders go a lot faster only need weight shift and have better glide ratio. sorry for the rant just my 2 cents.
  • Well, the budget has been approved and the non-powered UAV paraglider will be the project.  What I'm trying to figure out right now is exactly what we'll need.  It will need to be able to do the following:

    - Trigger servos in different situations according to input from: 6DOF data, magnetometer, GPS, barometer, airspeed sensor?  -- 2 servos to pull brake toggles, 1 to shift it's weight R/L, 1 to cut away 1st chute and deploy second.
    - Make decisions on how to use the above according to a map of good vs bad landing zones

    So the parts list I'm working on includes so far:

    - Ardupilot 2.0 (overkill? it seems like a good value)
    - Four ~5V 180 deg. servos
    -  an external airspeed sensor?  (I haven't been able to locate one but I assume you must need something that actually measures the relative wind.)
    - a reliable ~5V lithium battery & charger


    Besides all that, the payload will include a Contour HD camera, a phone with GPS tracker for retrieval, two parachutes and the necessary hardware to connect to the servos and cut away the 1st / deploy the 2nd at a specific altitude.  Its body will be made of foamcore wrapped in insulating foil.  Then of course above it will be a balloon.  The line will have a round parachute on it, and packed into the top of the body will be the steerable ram-air chute that deploys when the round chute is cut away.

    The plan is to begin by throwing it off a building and seeing if it can find a target, then using a tethered helium balloon with pulleys to repeatedly hoist it up and drop it to test it's parachute deployment and navigation skills.  Then we will use larger balloons to release it from progressively higher altitudes.  When it repeatedly navigates well from ~400 ft. drops, we'll see how it handles thousands, tens of thousands of feet.

    For the software, we will give it polygons indicating safe and unsafe landing zones on the ground.  The plan is to predict the general area it might land in, and map as much as possible using satellite imagery & maps showing where good (parks, fields, etc) and bad (rivers, freeways, airports, etc.) landing zones are.  Hopefully we can make it avoid the bad places and steer towards the good using weight-shift and brakes, like your typical parachutist.

    Any advice would be appreciated!  especially about the parts.  I'm a bit confused.

    thnx

  • It's no secret that plenty are working on return-to-launch HAB payloads, myself included.  The ram-air parachute is an interesting idea and could be used to steer the payload to a more appropriate location, but I suspect it would be difficult to do much more with it.  The glide-ratio of a parachute/inflatable wing of any description is always going to be a little compromised and when you only get to deploy it at lower altitudes, the distance you can travel will be somewhat limited.

    If you deploy too far up, you run into the problem of limited penetration speed as you pass through the jetstream.  IMO, you need to be able to put on a good turn of speed through this altitude band to have any chance of making it back home, since headwinds could be 200mph or more.  You don't want to spend long there, and when you are there, you want to minimise the headwind effect as much as possible.  That equals high speed on both counts.

    As for powered return-to-launch, given that you have to carry the energy requried throughout most of your mission, it might be difficult to carry more than 30-40mins of powered flight endurance.  At low, model-aircraft-type airspeeds, that doesn't represent much distance.

    I'd encourage anyone who's considering anything like this to get the pencil and calculator out and do a few simple fag-packet sums.  A little engineering goes a long way in this area, although many appear to be reluctant to do it.  I'd also recommend X-plane (or similar) simulations, since you can get a very good idea of what logisitcs are needed for very little outlay.

    Good luck with your attempt and keep us all posted!

    Andrew

     

This reply was deleted.

Activity

Neville Rodrigues liked Neville Rodrigues's profile
Jun 30
Santiago Perez liked Santiago Perez's profile
Jun 21
More…