Mission Planning with multiple altitudes

Hi,

I want to plan a mission where Home is, let's say 1,000ft. The WP is 1,400ft but there is a small mountain between the WP1 which is 2,000ft. What is the most efficient way to plan such a round trip? Obviously, I could use +2 intermediate WPs at 2,000ft, one outbound and one inbound but I would rather use just one WP and Home. If I check Verify Height will that do the trick? Also, if Verify Height is checked, will the entire flight be terrain following?

Thanks for any help from you experts,

Steven

You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!

Join diydrones

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I believe I've answered my own question.  I recreated the symptoms, where it fails to come back up to the correct altitude after going down to a lower altitude.  I had the parameter WPNAV_RFND_USE set to 1 (enabled).  Changed it to 0 and all is well, it goes up and down per waypoint altitudes. 

  • Just had an experience (crash) that bears on this discussion.  It was an Auto Mode mission starting from my backyard, going up to 40m to avoid some low hills, flying out to a lake which is about 65m lower than my yard, dropping to 15m for a Loiter cirlce to shoot some video, then rising back to 40m, and home.  It never made it home, and I found it had crashed into one of the low hills on its way back.  I was able to retrieve it and get the log (here attached).  I have a lidar unit installed in the belly that gives distance about ground readings up to 20m.  Arducopter 5.5

    Per the log of BARO Altitude, (and pic attached) it behaved as expected until it got to the lake.  It then descended to 40m below starting elevation (a descent of 80m which would put it about 15m above the lake), did it's circles to shoot video.  Then unfortunately, it came up only 40m and headed home.  Not high enough to avoid the low hills.  

    My questions are: How did it go down to 15m above the lake since per the log the lidar RNFD Dist seems valid only at the very beginning and end of the flight? Why did it seem to reset the base elevation and not come back up to 40m above home?  How should I have set up the waypoint altitudes?  Any ideas? 

    LakeFlight.BIN

    IMG_20180820_211837.jpg

    https://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/3702441690?profile=original
  • Verify height works as above. You are asking if arduplane supports terrain following in auto mode. Yes, it does. It is a parameter you change to on. But beware, sometimes it doesn't work perfect and your plane can only fly up so fast, so have it look ahead adequately.
  • I can help you with this one. Go to the MP Flight Plan tab. Under Way Points, you will see a drop down box for absolute, relative and terrain.

    Steven

  • Thank you for answers. That clears it up for me. I can use multiple Way Points, I was just curious how sophisticated MP and AP were.
    Thanks again,
    Steven
  • First off - I fly in Oklahoma where the ground is flat and so I haven't USED verify height.  But according to the manual, it doesn't exactly do what you want, because it only checks and adjusts the ground altitude at waypoints.

    By default, the mission planner uses 'above launch site' as the reference for all altitudes, and with 'verify height' turned on it uses 'above current ground level'.

    so with verify height turned on, you could set

    WP1 at altitude 100' a little bit upwind of the takeoff site

    WP2 at altitude 100' on top of the mountain

    WP3 at altitude 100' at the target site

    WP4 at altitude 100' on top of the mountain

    WP5 at altitude 100' a little bit downwind of the takeoff site.

    or with verify height turned off you would set

    WP1 at 100'  (above launch site)

    WP2 at 1100' (above launch site)

    WP3 at 500' (above launch site)

    WP4 at 1100' (above launch site)

    WP5 at 100' (above launch site)

    or with absolute altitude turned on it would be

    WP1 at 1100'

    WP2 at 2100'

    WP3 at 1500'

    WP4 at 2100'

    WP5 at 1100'

    All of these three courses are exactly the same - they're just different ways of entering the values.  If you do this, the aircraft will take off at 1000' ASL, fly to 1100'ASL, ascend to 2100' ASL to cross the mountain with 100' of clearance, descent to 1500' at the target location, climb back to 2100' to get back over the mountain and then return to 1500' and lined up for a landing.

    If you just set WP 1 and 3 and 5 from the above example, even with verify height turned on, you're going to crash into the mountain.  The MP only checks and adjusts for terrain height at waypoints.  To my knowledge there's no way around this right now.  Maybe in the future the Sonar sensor or a machine vision system could let you actually see the terrain, but right now we just have to plan ahead for it ourselves.  There's not enough memory in Ardupilot to store the terrain height values for every place we could possibly fly it, and the programming doesn't RELY on the base station for anything when on an Automatic path - all of the decisions are made in the air so if telemetry is lost, the vehicle tries to complete the mission.

    Is there a reason you don't want to give it a couple of extra clicks to make sure you get over the mountain?   I'd personally set my 2100' ASL waypoint in FRONT of the mountain and another 2100' WP substantially BEHIND it to make sure I'm up high way before I need to be and back down after all risk of collision is passed.  And for that matter, I'd want more than 100' of spare clearance going over a mountain, but I'm just using that number for easily following the discussion!

    • Hello Art, this is an old threat, however please could you tell me how to switch between Relative and Absolute altittude, I don´t see any option in the screen.

      thanks

      • Go to MP, then to Flight Plan tab. Under WP, there is a drop down with absolute, relative and terrain.

  • Can anyone help me with this, please? The DEVELOPERS certainly have to know the answer.
    Thanks,
    Steven

This reply was deleted.

Activity

DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @chr1sa: Donkeycar 4.4 released with tons of new features, including path learning (useful with GPS outdoors), better Web and Lidar supp…
Nov 27
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @NXP: We are already biting our nails in anticipation of the #NXPCupEMEA challenge! 😉 Did you know there are great cash prizes to be won…
Nov 24
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @gclue_akira: レースまであと3日。今回のコースは激ムズかも。あと一歩 #jetracer https://t.co/GKcEjImQ3t
Nov 24
DIY Robocars via Twitter
UC Berkeley's DIY robocar program https://roar.berkeley.edu/
Nov 24
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @chr1sa: The next @DIYRobocars autonomous car race at @circuitlaunch will be on Sat, Dec 10. Thrills, spills and a Brazilian BBQ. Fun…
Nov 24
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @arthiak_tc: Donkey car platform ... Still training uses behavioral cloning #TCXpo #diyrobocar @OttawaAVGroup https://t.co/PHBYwlFlnE
Nov 20
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @emurmur77: Points for style. @donkeycar racing in @diyrobocars at @UCSDJacobs thanks @chr1sa for taking the video. https://t.co/Y2hMyj1…
Nov 20
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @SmallpixelCar: Going to @diyrobocars race at @UCSDJacobs https://t.co/Rrf9vDJ8TJ
Nov 8
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @SmallpixelCar: Race @diyrobocars at @UCSDJacobs thanks @chr1sa for taking the video. https://t.co/kK686Hb9Ej
Nov 8
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @PiWarsRobotics: Presenting: the Hacky Racers Robotic Racing Series in collaboration with #PiWars. Find out more and register your inter…
Oct 23
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @Hacky_Racers: There will be three classes at this event: A4, A2, and Hacky Racer! A4 and A2 are based around UK paper sizing and existi…
Oct 23
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Oct 23
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Oct 19
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Oct 18
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @NeaveEng: Calling all UK based folks interested in @diyrobocars, @f1tenth, @donkey_car, and similar robot racing competitions! @hacky_r…
Oct 13
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @araffin2: 🏎️ After hours of video editing, I'm happy to share a best of my Twitch videos on learning to race with RL. 🏎️ Each part is…
Oct 13
More…