This ardupilotmega hardware in the loop block for scicoslab marks the completion of an open source, completely free autopilot design and testing tool chain. The jsbsimcomm block communicates with the ardupilotmega hil block to simulate an actual flight. Servos move in response to the autopilot and may also be manually controlled with the radio receiver. This isn't polished yet, but it's working and I'll be cleaning it up this week. I've used the boost asio library for serial communication so the scicoslab blocks should also compile on windows if your lucky. Will probably take some work if anyone wants to volunteer. :-). Source code is on http://hsl.dynalias.com/git/?p=JSBSim;a=summary
This ardupilotmega hardware in the loop block for scicoslab marks the completion of an open source, completely free autopilot design and testing tool chain. The jsbsimcomm block communicates with the ardupilotmega hil block to simulate an actual flight. Servos move in response to the autopilot and may also be manually controlled with the radio receiver. This isn't polished yet, but it's working and I'll be cleaning it up this week. I've used the boost asio library for serial communication so the scicoslab blocks should also compile on windows if your lucky. Will probably take some work if anyone wants to volunteer. :-). Source code is on http://hsl.dynalias.com/git/?p=JSBSim;a=summary
You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!
Comments
Where from they will dependent?
Should it be a static or variable?
And how this 'low pass filter' implement to APM code?
I think that you need the dynamic model for the Rascal if you want to find the trim solution isn't?
Also...
Can I use also Matlab instead of Scicoslab?
I need your advise as an expert.
What do you suggest if compare a APM and Autopilot implemented in FG. How match autopilot implemented by FG more quality vs APM?
Still at Uni?
Is it possible to implement a JSBSim inside Ardumega and use it not like simulation but like another kind of AP autopilot engine?
tell me please, what benefit will I get if I'll use yours simulating instead Flight Gear for example?
As I see your and FG solutions use one phisic engine.
1. Is it more convinient?
2. Has it more accuracy?
3.??