3D Robotics

3689408512?profile=originalHoly crap. DARPA has just announced a project to use the DIY Drones model for the future of military UAVs. Called UAVForge, which is already up and running (although it crashes Firefox on my machine), it is described in the official request for proposals like this:

 

This initiative aims to produce a small, affordable, and easy to operate unmanned air vehicle capable of persistent perch and stare surveillance. The successful offeror will empower a diverse community of innovators and emergent design teams by providing manufacturing capabilities and assessments and producing up to 15 units of the winning design. The UAVForge initiative will employ a collaboration website and a fly-off competition, both developed and administered for DARPA/TTO by the Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center, Atlantic (SSC Atlantic), Charleston, SC.

 

Here's a conceptual video:

 

Many more details are in the full pdf description here. It's a $2 million project, with $100,000 going to the winning designer.

 

Some excerpts:

 

Small unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) have proven important in modern military operations and
show promise for civil applications. Portable UAVs are used by the military for reconnaissance
missions and have been used commercially for tasks such as monitoring oil and gas pipelines,
and tracking wildfires. However, the effective use of state-of-the-art systems is constrained by
cost and performance as well as high logistic support and operator skill and workload demands,
compared to more routinely employed portable military equipment, like GPS and night vision
devices.


The UAVForge initiative will use a collaboration/competition crowdsource approach to produce
a small, affordable, and easy to operate UAV capable of persistent perch and stare surveillance.
Novel manufacturing concepts and resources will empower a diverse community of innovators
and emergent teams to deliver a superior UAV system solution relative to state-of-the-art
systems. The overall objective of UAVForge is to develop an aircraft that costs $10,000 or less
per unit, can be carried in a rucksack by an individual, can fly to and perch in useful locations at
several kilometers range for periods of several hours, and provide continuous, real-time
surveillance without dedicated or specialized operators.

 

In this solicitation, DARPA is seeking innovative manufacturing services to facilitate the
UAVForge initiative. The selected manufacturer will support collaboration and produce the
winning design from the UAVForge competition.

 

UAVForge is a DARPA/TTO initiative supported by the Space and Naval Warfare Systems
Center, Atlantic (SSC Atlantic), Charleston, South Carolina, to leverage the unique potential of
crowdsourcing. SSC Atlantic will develop and maintain the www.UAVForge.net website, which
provides participants with the virtual environment and tools necessary to organize and
collaborate independent of geographic location, education, profession, or experience. The virtual
environment features collaboration tools including shared and private information spaces,
message boards, mailing lists, and other features that enable effective collaboration.

 

Collaboration will focus on an objective list of small UAV capabilities (Appendix 1). A series of
multimedia-based milestones (Appendix 2) will encourage the formation of ad-hoc teams around
promising solutions. These teams will develop functional design prototypes. DARPA will select,
based on published criteria and crowd/manufacturer input, the top ten designs to participate in a
fly-off competition hosted by SSC Atlantic (Appendix 3). DARPA will select one winning
design based on the results of the competition and crowd/manufacturer input. The winning team
will receive a $100,000 prize and an invitation to participate in an exclusive overseas military
demonstration exercise.

 

The selected manufacturer from this solicitation will provide the winning team with a subcontract to produce an initial lot of up to 15 UAVs for government experimentation. The selected manufacturer will play an integral role in the evolution and execution of the UAVForge initiative. For planning purposes, award of the manufacturing services contract will occur four months after the start of UAVForge collaboration and four months before the fly-off competition.

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!

Join diydrones

Comments

  • 3D Robotics
    Matthias: What are you talking about? We're not entering this competition or helping with it in any way. I just posted because I thought the community would be interested in the news that our model is getting attention. We're 100% open source, which is incompatible with the DARPA rules.
  • I will watch this subject very closely with a bad feeling. I do not really see what is in for us  with this Darpa project.

    If diydrone loose momentum in term of innovation, open source or international open mindness, I won't like it.

    Let's hope that Chris makes the right choices.

     

  • Developer

    It seems that you all taking this one too serious :) It's just another way to get more views on YouTube :)

    And spread the word about DIYDrones :) Just don't put anything there that you want your IP rights on it.

    You can look at it (in USA) as some way to get your TAX money back, if you win :) 

    I agree with Doug on the design part of it, yes they will get cool ideas for free, but I glad to see that the government finely understanding the power of the internet (in it own f@#$% way).

    I can rant like.... forever :) about it, if it good or bad :)

    I don't see military quads used in warfare, in the near future,

    but I see DIY and private UAVs covering the sky in next few years. 

     

  • As kid's we all played with gun's i think... Was funny.

    But now, if we support some military solution,
    some day we possible can see our copterdesign producing some collateral damage somewhere out there.
    I'm a pragmatical person, and I know some things must be done ... but.. sorry.. the us military has done some not so nice things out there the last years.
    So I wouldn't support any project which helps them.

    I'm from germany and we have some problems with the 'good' war idea (depending to our past)
  • Developer

    Converting Open source To Closed source systems should NOT cost 2 million, DARPA can do its own Google searches. Then hire a contractor to build the junk, just as China does now.  

    Most of my current hardware sources are Chinese, using USA designs.

    They plan on testing winning design out of country, want to goto Afghanistan?

  • Admin
    Doug is getting too close to plot!!! what shall / should ......    do to him?!!!!!
  • Developer

    Please read all regulations when joining.

    You are releasing all rights to intellectual property, and must comply with ITAR and Munitions export laws.

    I wish a non-military, non-governmental sponsor (Gates, Oracle, Google) would step up for a civilian use contest in USA for Drones and allow us to keep our property and rights!

    I joined to see what develops, I will not compete or contribute.

  • Alright, sorry if my earlier comment sounded a bit aggressive.

     

    Long story short, I once wanted to do military drone research "when I grew up" because the state-of-the-art was there, but after thinking about the topic for a long time, and staying informed of how those military drones were used, I ended up pledging to myself NOT to use my knowledge to help the US war effort. Military tech interests me as much as the next guy but I can't get behind it. Part of me was glad to see that rule about no military tech when I first came here a few months ago.

    With that said, Chris explained his choice and I'm gonna respect that. I too am curious to see what will come out of this initiative.

  • Developer
    I agree to much of this, but remember that the $10K is just the cost of the actual drone. First you have to define, refine and standardize a manufacturing process (those 15 are probably just an initial test batch). Big companies (like the military) are very picky about consistent manufacturing procedures and quality assurance.  In addition you have documentation, certification, training , service and support and whatever else the military decide they need. In addition to equipment for manufacturing etc, all this is going to require  lots and lots of man hours.
  • This is always the dilemma of Science: everybody calls you strange/foolish/weird to chase a dream, but when a real solution is working the killing-boys are first to call in. Do we really want DIY-drones to hunt-find-kill the next Bin-laden-ace? Or for those who believe in that war: to hunt-find-kill the winner of the $100K so they won't have to actually give the money?

    And yes i'm a bit over the top now, but it would be nice to have such a discussion. I for one don't want to participate in a military-UAV. That rescue-drone-competition sounds more like a right way to go.

This reply was deleted.