The man who wrote an ordinance that would require the town of Deer Trail to issue hunting licenses for drones, has already sold more than 60 of his own licenses online.
"It's been slow getting the word out," the proposal's author Phil Steel said. "But the ball's rolling."
Most of the licenses — printed on translucent 8½ by 11 inch vellum paper with a spot for the signature of Deer Trail's mayor — have shipped out of state. One order came from Australia, he said.
Earlier this year, after reports about increased government surveillance via unmanned aircraft, Steel proposed an ordinance requiring the town to issue licenses for $25 per year to anyone who applies — so long as they read and understand English.
The drones would have to be flying less than 1,000 feet high over private property and shooting would only be allowed during daylight.
The town board split on the ordinance.
Now Deer Trail residents will have the final say on the ordinance in a special election set for Oct. 8.
But the issue won't go away, even if the ordinance fails, Steel says.
He has started Professional Drone Hunters Inc., envisioning the company as a vendor for governments issuing licenses — but he wants his home town of Deer Trail to be first.
"The town will have the choice of reinventing the wheel," Steel said Tuesday. "It's a question of not whether licenses are going to be sold, but a question of whether the town is willing to accept free money."
Steel said he is concerned about the FAA's work to integrate drones into American airspace, and the possibility of redefining navigable airspace to allow craft to fly lower.
Steel has never seen a drone flying near his property, but he intends the licenses to be more than just symbolic.
"My intent is to encourage people to shoot back," Steel said. "We've lost our patience."
The Federal Aviation Administration has warned that shooting at unmanned aircraft could be subject to criminal or civil liabilities and warned that it creates a danger to the public.
Yesenia Robles: 303-954-1372, yrobles@denverpost.com or twitter.com/yeseniarobles
Comments
So, you can't fly your quadcopter or whatever (are flying wings included? or any other FPV type aircraft?) in Deer Trail, Colorado?
Because firing wildly into the air with potentially lethal weapons is always a good idea. The town council should read "Deadeye Dick" by Kurt Vonnegut.
yup I have to agree with Harry... Being a pr#ck who thinks he can fly wherever he wants to regardless of what others think is what gets us in trouble...
Give me a goddamned break, I havent attacked anyone. All I see is a bunch who can't tolerate that some people don't want their rights trampled, have come up with a clever way to make that point, and are seen as ignorant yokels. The tolerance and respect that's missing has to do with respect for the rights of others, and tolerance of differing views.
As one resident put it, "People think we’re hillbillies and idiots, and we’re not."
I would love to get in contact with some of the people in opposition to this, and get their side of the story. I may do some research,
Well, if anything, we have this...
http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/local-news/townmembers-want-de...
It seems many within the town do not like the attention this is bringing, and are asking for the whole thing to be stopped.
@Harry:
What part of "tolerance" involves tolerating threats of violence (even if by d-bags incapable or too gutless to actually carry them out)? And why would anyone "respect" these malignant hayseeds for their sociopathic behaviors and feeble scams? And where have you been in the weeks that they have been getting the roasting they deserve by just about everyone who commented in these forums (this is not the first thread about this benighted pothole of a town)? If you're looking for a job as an apologist I'm afraid you're too late. (Pro Tip: When peddling yourself as a bastion of tolerance and respect, refrain from personal attacks.)
Wow, so tolerant, respectful and thoroughly knowledgeable. If your attitude is any indication as to how "drones" will be abused, they won't be able to print these licenses fast enough.
These yokels are nothing but a pack of publicity-mongering weasels trying to milk the serious work of others for financial gain. Their feeble attempt at disguising that first as noble resistance against The Man and then as "aw shucks" humor is pathetic and transparent. They would run for the nearest cave if a federal agent so much as waggled a finger at them, and the unfunny concept of supposedly humorous "hunting licenses" goes back to the 1960s when they were sold by similar rednecks in flyover states for "hippies" and "[n-word]" . These clowns have no intention of breaking any laws, other than the laws of common sense and good taste. They only shoot blanks. And I have no idea what you eat, but these stains in the gene pool sure as hell don't feed me.
They havent broken anything yet.