"The FAA has released a set of cease and desist letters sent in 2012 and 2013 to people operating drone vehicles for a variety of purposes including: tornado research, inspecting gas well stacks, aerial photography, journalism education, and other purposes. Drone cease and desist letters sent during 2014 are available from the FAA upon request." The text of the letters (bureaucratically polite, but bureaucratically firm) often starts with notes indicating that the UAV operators to whom they were sent that the FAA became interested in them because it "became aware of" their web sites, or even because someone tipped them off about an article in a community newsletter. The letters go on to outline the conditions under which the FAA allows the operation of unmanned aircraft, and specifically notes: Those who use UAS only for recreational enjoyment, operate in accordance with Advisory arcular 91-57. This generally applies to operations in remotely populated areas away from airports, persons and buildings, below 400 feet Above Ground Level, and within visual line of sight. On February 6, 2007 the FAA published UAS guidance in the Federal Register, 14 CPR Part 91 / Docket No. FAA-2006-25714 I Unmanned Airaaft Operations in the National Airspace System. Toward the end of the docket it says, ''The FAA recognizes that people and companies other than modelers might be flying UAS with the mistaken understanding that they are legally operating under the authority of AC 91-57. AC 91-57 only applies to modelers, and thus specifically excludes Its use by pecions or companies for business purposes."
You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!
Comments
Then you have an unusual hobby, but a perfectly legal one :)
What if my hobby was photographing real estate, farms and power lines from a drone?
I think it means offer to use the Drone for free. Charge money for something not related.
what does it mean to casual flyers who do photography as a hobby?
Why just the IP and not just mask whole sections coming from similar sources? Even better dynamic content aimed at the intended visitors, oh yeah that is advertising these days, so apply proper advertising ;)
What if UAV operators blocked the FAA's IP address from accessing their sites? :-D
Didn't american judges dismissed twice now this FAA interpretation of things, ie forbidden to operate drones ? If correct FAA should be put back at its place firmly requesting that they follow their country's justice decisions.
@Chim might want to take a closer look at the original post. There is a link to the cease and desist letters sent in 2012 and 2013
The link is to a PDF that has a copies of the letter towards the bottom of the PDF.
PDF link:
http://www.governmentattic.org/12docs/FAA-UASwarnings_2012-2013.pdf
Maybe the FAA should worry more about meeting the deadlines Congress gave it, rather than waste resources chasing law-abiding operators doing more good than harm.
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next