HOWTO & optimization tool: Optimize your UAV's frequencies

How to optimize the choice of your UAV's radio frequencies


1. Introduction


As we make our UAV fly we use multiple radio frequency bands for different uses : RC control of the craft, eventual telemetry band, eventual video downlink band (FPV or camera monitoring), GPS.

An issue we have all already encountered are interferences between used radio frequencies.

So how could we try to optimize, in a simple manner, the choice of our UAV's various radio frequencies (rc control, telem, FPV, ...) ?


2. Basic radio wave principles background


Radio waves are sinusoidal signals or a combination thereof. Any radio signal can be reconstructed by an addition of sine waves of various amplitudes and frequencies. Alternatively there are mathematical functions we can use to decompose (analyze) an apparently very complex signal in a number of pure sine waves (of various amplitudes and frequencies), so as for example to extract from the lot those who have the largest amplitude. 

The point is that a radio signal is never a pure sine wave propagating on a unique single frequency.

Here come the "harmonics".

Every radio emission does not only emit on its base frequency but also on a number of "harmonics". Harmonics are radio waves propagating at a multiple frequency of the base frequency. The following figure, copied from the amateur radio wiki, illustrates what harmonics are:

(if you'd like more info google "radio frequency harmonics" to find the radio amateur's wiki site)


The issue with harmonics is that they are not on your mind when you decide to use channel 5 of your FPV transmitter. You selected channel 5 on your FPV Tx because it seems to be apparently far enough from all the other frequencies you have on your drone; so it should be right ? guess what : not good enough.

Because of the "upstream" harmonics you might still suffer from interferences that will impact your RC control range, disturb your GPS reception (bad HDOP) and or create lines and interferences in your video downlink.

The most annoying harmonics are mostly the ones resulting from the emission of a lower base frequency having an impact on higher base frequencies. An "impact" means that an harmonic's frequency is too close to another base frequency we want to use.


3. And so what ?


So it becomes quite a burden in practice to define for example which FPV Tx channel should I best use, because thanks to these harmonics we can't simply compare the base frequencies of rc control, telemetry, FPV, GPS. We must also consider all of their harmonics !

Don't worry, except if you're a genius,  you should normally not be able to compute which FPV channel is best, just like that, on top of your head.

So we need either to write down on paper all of the upstream harmonics of all the base frequencies and then compare all of these values manually to find what is the optimum frequency combination.

The best combination is the set of (base) frequencies that maximize the frequency distances (in mhz) between not only these base frequencies themselves but also all of their (upstream) harmonics.

You might ask : up to which harmonics should we compute ? 3rd ? 4th ? 5th ? Well that depends on your base frequencies. For example, if you use very high frequencies such as a FPV 5.8Ghz band, then you will have to compute the harmonics of your 900Mhz telemetry link up to the 8th order.


4. A tentative tool


I tried tonight to produce a simple excel calculation tool (there was nothing on TV) that will automate the computation of which is the best choice for your FPV channel, in function of your defined RC control, telemetry and GPS base frequencies.

I chose the FPV channel as the variable to optimize in the equation, because in practice this is the only radio component on your drone for which you can choose different channels (GPS is fixed, Telemetry is quasi fixed, RC control is fixed in its frequency hopping band).


This is a screenshot of the excel tool :

You enter your own frequeny data in function of your configuration : the yellow cells are the cells where you enter your data.  All frequencies are expressed in Mhz.

You get the ability to enter up to 10 frequencies to analyze (to choose from).

The "Results" frame shows you a color coded computation result for each of the 10 frequencies :

-Green means the best frequencies,

-Orange means it is ok but not optimal (there are other frequencies which are better to use),

-Red means a bad frequency to use because it interferes with another radio component on your UAV.


Optional parameters allow you to define two things:

-Minimimum wished frequency distance (in Mhz) : this is the minimum amount of frequency distance between two frequencies that is required to avoid interferences (100 mhz by default).

-Max capping value for distance calculation : this is an internal computation parameter, just leave it at 100.


I tried this method (manually until this tool) for myself to choose my FPV freq among the 9 available channels and could observe indeed a clear improvement on my GPS HDOP stability (I often had an issue that my 1.3Ghz band FPV would disturb the GPS HDOP). I am curious if this method/tool could also improve your own setup; in any case let the community know what your improvement results are !


You can download the excel tool here:


Any suggestion for improvements welcome,


Hope it will help,




Views: 8326

Comment by Dez Socks on March 18, 2014 at 9:12pm

Nice work!Thanks

Comment by Crady von Pawlak on March 18, 2014 at 9:21pm

I live the US which means [legally] 433 MHz isn't an option for telemetry which means I'm forced to use 915 MHz. And, because my telemetry is on 915 MHz and my RC control is on 2.4 GHz, I have few legal options for video: 1280 MHz, 1258 MHz, or 5.8 GHz. I would prefer to use the lower frequencies because of their superior range but according to your calculator, 1258 MHz is flat-out unacceptable and 1280 MHz only scores a 0.97.
Question: Would an inline low-pass filter on the FPV transmitter antenna positively affect the results?
Great tool by the way =)

Comment by hotelzululima on March 18, 2014 at 9:29pm

uh take the FCC technician test.. all 300 questions/answers from which the test pool is pulled is online at both the FCC and the ARRL I did 8 years ago and never regretted.. no code exam=easy... then 432 ATV perfectly legal..

Comment by Bill Bonney on March 18, 2014 at 9:33pm
The tool doesn't account the harmonics amplitude. They also vary. Using a LP filter is one way to reduce the harmonics strength.

Comment by Gary Mortimer on March 18, 2014 at 10:05pm

All of this of course becomes mute when the WRC RPAS ruling come's into play and the international C2 RPAS frequencies become written in stone. Some light reading to get you started....

Unlike the FAA these meetings are happening and are on track.

Comment by Hugues on March 18, 2014 at 11:25pm

@Crady, by default 100Mhz is a "huge" frequency distance. Maybe try a smaller gap. 0.97 means you have a usable frequency. You can certainly solve eventual harmonics conflicts with RF filters. You can do d some at Readymaderc or Digikey.

@Bill, thx for mentioning. Are those LP filters you mention the same as the above mentioned RF filters?

@Gary, thx for these slides. Is this Jarus group something that will produce enforcing laws or rules in all of the participating countries?

Comment by Crady von Pawlak on March 18, 2014 at 11:41pm

Cool.  Thanks, Hughes.

Comment by Rob_Lefebvre on March 19, 2014 at 5:37am

Crady, give 5.8GHz a shot.  You can go very long range with the right setup.

Comment by Gary Mortimer on March 19, 2014 at 5:42am

@Hugues yes it will be worldwide for all UAS, private or commercial. Its protected frequencies for our use only. At the moment looks like a chunk above 5Ghz. The next World Radio Council is hoped to rule on it.

Comment by Pedals2Paddles on March 19, 2014 at 6:13am

Great easy to use tool.  Harmonics like this are often overlooked even in the professional world of RF.  Fortunately, there is no interference between 2.4ghz control, 5.4ghz video, and GPS.

Using high/low cut filters is usually not very helpful. The harmonic is ON your frequency. You can't filter out the harmonic without filtering out the signal you WANT as well.  The only way is to change frequencies or alter the effective radiated power.  High / low cut filters are only useful for cutting de-sense (overload) from nearby frequencies on nearby transmitters.

Also bear in mind that adding filters induces RF loss.  We aren't talking about much power to begin with here.  Inducing 3db of RF loss effectively cuts your power in half.


You need to be a member of DIY Drones to add comments!

Join DIY Drones

© 2019   Created by Chris Anderson.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service