Inverted V-tail advantages?

Did some googling on military UAVs and it came up with this nice site, listing 30 UAVs currently in use and for future deployment.

09-rq-7.jpg


http://www.popsci.com/technology/gallery/2010-02/gallery-future-drones

I found the inverted v-tails on some of them interesting, can anyone enlighten me on the advantages they present compared to normal v-tails or even more conventional tailplanes? I've seen one or two blog posts with similar mods, but it seems all it does is save weight.


http://uavkes.blogspot.com <- our blog


E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!

Join diydrones

Comments

  • Does anyone know the best way to install the servos for inverted v tail, mirroring eachother, like standard aileron servos, or the same way?
  • Admin
    Offers high vantage point for antennas , strobes, high clearance from dragging/scrapping the tail during takeoff and landing, 2 servos instead of 3 etc
  • it adds clearance at take-off and landing time, too
  • One of the big advantages I have heard in favor of inverted V tail designs is its stability in cross wind situations. For an example when hit by a cross wind gust on landing the inverted V will cause the airplane to pitch up as opposed to diving into the ground. It shouldn't make any difference when used with an autopilot but many military UAVs are remotely piloted during landing.
  • At typical UAV high wing loading (all that I've flown so far), if your're in a spin which means your onboard INS, autopilot, and other systems had failed, then it doesn't matter what tail configuration you have - you'll be wishing for a ballistic parachute!
  • How does it do in a flat spin situation? I know the standard V tail configeration has some negative history with unrecoverability. Sort of an Urban myth. Anyone?
  • In theory yes - it works OK for small light weight plane but when you go to a larger platform, you would still want aileron to correct bank angle because there would be a larger mass (wing) to move around...don't think the ruddervator alone can give you enough response.
  • So the V tail can function as the only control surfaces on the plane? Would that fly similar to a flying wing without any true yaw (roll and pitch to turn)?
  • Thanks for all the help, I'll definitely be considering this setup in a future project :)
  • Standart V tails works like counter aileron and reduces aileron effect.
    Inverted V tails works like an aileron and plane can turn perfect without aileron.
    Aileronless design = removable and rigid wings.
This reply was deleted.