3D Robotics

Ionic Thrusters for Drone Propulsion?


Ionic thrusters use high voltage to ionize air and create an airflow, which in the right configuation can create thrust with no moving parts. I've tried an experiment like the above, and barely generated enough lift to raise a little balsa and aluminum foil off a table, but MIT says they can do far better.

From The Verge:

Stealth drones and other aircraft of the future could be powered by engines that don't have any moving parts, can't be detected by infrared, and are more efficient than what we have today. A new study by MIT researchers demonstrated all of these capacities and more for ionic thrusters and now at least one major aerospace company, Lockheed Martin, has said it's investigating the technology.

"I think UAVs would be the most likely initial application if [ionic thrusters] work," said the lead researcher in the study, MIT aerospace professor Steven Barrett, in an email to The Verge. Ionic thrusters for aircraft work by generating a high-voltage electrical field that strips electrons from air molecules, "ionizing" them and pushing them away behind an aircraft as ionic wind, to move the craft forward. Scientists and hobbyists have been tinkering with small, lightweight model planes using these kinds of propulsion systems since the 1960s. The technology uses no moving parts and is almost completely silent. It hasn't come to full-size planes, though, due to power concerns.

But scientists at MIT's department of aeronautics have built a working prototype (pictured above) that suggests the technology is more feasible than previously assumed, generating far more thrust (110 newtons per kilowatt of power) than a comparable jet engine (2 newtons per kilowatt). "You could imagine all sorts of military or security benefits to having a silent propulsion system with no infrared signature," said Steven Barrett, the lead author of the study published today in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society. Indeed, Lockheed Martin is already expressing an interest, with an executive telling MIT News "there are still unanswered questions, but because they seem so efficient, it’s definitely worth investigating further."

Barrett told The Verge there are still major hurdles to overcome before aircraft ionic thrusters are able to be commercialized, namely a large enough power supply for their electrical field, and a way to retain efficiency at higher speeds. "At reasonable flight speeds [about 560 miles per hour] the efficiency does decrease, but still looks promising," he wrote in an email. Also, because it uses air molecules, "this kind of propulsion only works in an atmosphere," Barrett said. "It need not be the Earth's atmosphere though – for example, it could be useful in exploration of other planets where fully electric propulsion without moving parts may be beneficial."

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!

Join diydrones


  • This article is completely obscuring the most important facts. The point is developing enough thrust using ion propulsion to carry a power supply, not the size of the craft in general. This used to be considered impossible.

    Historically the MIT craft is the second ion propelled aircraft ever to carry its power supply, though it was launched with the assistance of a bungee cord. The largest ion propelled craft ever flown most likely was by the Japanese in 2003, though with an external power supply. That one can be seen on the "Lifters Replications (or builders) Page".

    The first and only solely ion propelled aircraft to take off and fly using only ions, with an onboard power supply, is the Patented "Self Contained Ion Powered Aircraft". It is many times more efficient and has a far higher power to weight ratio than more recent MIT glider. Videos and the website for it are easy to find on google.

  • Luc, it's definitely NO mockup. I've visited there a few times. I was born not too far from it. Just look at the site coralcastle.com

    Really unexplainable with our current technology. He was levitating those rocks somehow and did it by himself.

  • Deep Space 1 used a type of Ion Thruster and that was 14 years ago.  But then again the thrust on that thing was only (like) 1/50th of a pound, great for space not so good for here on earth.

  • Coral Castle, did not know that place but it is possible to create "stone" artifacts with the use of particular enzymes and sand. Nowadays there is a kind of 3D printer that create large architectural artifacts with that method.

  • Apperently every other page was left blank so that the reader could add his/her own thoughts! Pretty awesome!

  • Was what a scam? Coral Castle? His book? Both definitely real and unexplainable in our current knowledge. His thoughts on magnetics is different than what we are taught also.

  • Wasn't this a scam?

  • I have his book on magnetics. Very interesting. Have you seen it?
  • and a tiny frail body ! straaange :)

This reply was deleted.