It could still work with Contra rotation on each arm. in fact probably better than conventional quad. The rudder input just alters the torque bias from the top motors to the bottom ones. To introduce a redundancy feature why not have top motors on one FC and the lower ones on the bottoms ones?
Fogive the ridiculous diagram (I have neither the time, software or patients to do a better job) but I've never understood why the yaw issue arises on an 8 motor quad. Would this not work?
it is not a problem to get it working you just need a software that can control 8 motors seperatly.
@I.S.
At a normal quad configuration you have two CW and two CCW motors for example yaw left - you speed up the CW motors an slow down the CCW motors now on a X8 configuration with splitted servo signals to two ESC´s on each arm you almost have no tuning moment as the counter rotating configuration will compensate any turning moment so you definitely need a software which can control 8 motors separately. So for the example yaw left function on a X8 config you have to slow down all 4 CW motors and speed up all 4 CCW motors on each arm of the quad.
Splitting the servo signal to two ESC´s is not only inefficient its more unusable as of the counter rotating motors you have no tuning moment and therefore you will have no yaw function.
Apparently that is a problem, but a number of quads, and Tri copters use this arrangement. The Draganfly for example. Although I've heard the prop wash is an issue, a massive number of small/toy RC helicopters use this arrangement, so I'm not so sure its a big problem as they tend to be small and need stability. Jani mentioned a while back that unless you have a copter board specifically configured for this arrangement, simply splitting the servo signal to two ESCs per arm will work but is inefficient.
Comments
@Peter,
Do you know why it is inefficient? Is it more efficient to counter rotate? This puzzles me!
@ I.S Those are a little bit better than my diagram yes :)
Fogive the ridiculous diagram (I have neither the time, software or patients to do a better job) but I've never understood why the yaw issue arises on an 8 motor quad. Would this not work?
@Denny
it is not a problem to get it working you just need a software that can control 8 motors seperatly.
@I.S.
At a normal quad configuration you have two CW and two CCW motors for example yaw left - you speed up the CW motors an slow down the CCW motors now on a X8 configuration with splitted servo signals to two ESC´s on each arm you almost have no tuning moment as the counter rotating configuration will compensate any turning moment so you definitely need a software which can control 8 motors separately. So for the example yaw left function on a X8 config you have to slow down all 4 CW motors and speed up all 4 CCW motors on each arm of the quad.
Looks like Bros. Olson got it working OK
http://vimeo.com/9435221
Splitting the servo signal to two ESC´s is not only inefficient its more unusable as of the counter rotating motors you have no tuning moment and therefore you will have no yaw function.
@Robin
Apparently that is a problem, but a number of quads, and Tri copters use this arrangement. The Draganfly for example. Although I've heard the prop wash is an issue, a massive number of small/toy RC helicopters use this arrangement, so I'm not so sure its a big problem as they tend to be small and need stability. Jani mentioned a while back that unless you have a copter board specifically configured for this arrangement, simply splitting the servo signal to two ESCs per arm will work but is inefficient.
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
of 5 Next