We have finished new board NEO-M8N + Compass
NEO-M8N breakout board features:
- 72-channel u-blox M8 engine GPS/QZSS L1 C/A, GLONASS L10F, BeiDou B1 SBAS L1 C/A: WAAS, EGNOS, MSAS Galileo-ready E1B/C (NEO-M8N)
- SuperSense Indoor GPS, -167dBm
- On-board Ultra low noise 3.3V voltage regulator and RF filter for noise blocking
- USB, I2C (SDA,SCL) and Uart (Tx,Rx)
- Dual band GPS and Glonass antenna
- u-center GPS Evaluation Software
- Extensive visualization and evaluation features
- Supports AssistNow Online and AssistNow Offline A-GPS services
- 1 TTL UART port, 1 I2C port,1 USB port
- Time pulse LED
- Flash memory for firmware upgrade and settings inside in the module (can save setings without battery)
- Battery for HOT module start
- Build-in HMC5883L Compass
- Dimensions: 50x50 mm hole distance 45x45mm
- Weight 24 gram
- Fully assembled and ready to use
Comments
@Peter: I have been amazed by your great results with such a small antenna
http://plischka.at/PX4_PIXHAWK_Autopilot_Flight_Management_Unit_Tei...
Could not believe it. I am asking myself, if the M8N is better, than the M8Q
@Stefan Gofferje, I am still confused about the 5983 miracle. Meanwhile I tried several bobs to find out about the difference and haven´t been successful, And about better EMI/RFI resistance, where did you find that ? Both datasheets (5883 /5983) are telling the same, just this Sensors can be used in strong magnetic fields environments with a 1° to 2° compass heading accuracy. There are minor differences at the datasheet like ODR / continous measurement, but does the AC software recognizes this ? Accuracy , range and cross-axis sensitivity are the same, so what else is important ?
I already asked you last september.
@Stefan - thats whats made me ask - I've ordered one but I'd like the newer compass on it
@Oliver:
Read a few posts up :). I was asking them why they use the old 5883L :).
@Dan:
I basically agree but 5 blog posts in 3 months about various M8 boards (3 of which were basically about the same product -the "world's smallest M8 board" is pushing it a bit :). If they came up with really cool different stuff, I wouldn't mind even a post every day but about the same or very closely similar products...
Dunno, am I the only one who feels a bit "over-informed" about various M8-products now?
@Stefan - I'd agree that CSGShop has had a reasonable density of posts recently but they're not just plugging loosely relevant products, they're advertising custom products that meet requests from the community. They're doing it at lightning speed, at a reasonable cost and even provide performance testing.
I'm not advocating that DIYD become a forum for shops to plug their wares but we should be encouraging this sort of commercial engagement.
@CSGShop - I look forward to testing some of these modules!
HMC5983 is a drop-in replacement (come on - bad enough you don't know it but I did link the data sheet, plus it has been discussed here in the community extensively...) and LSM303D is the magneto used in the Pixhawk...
Besides, I would say that you totally don't see what this community is about. You just see it as a marketplace to sell your apparently hastily put together boards. So you are the first to offer an M8 board (here)... Great deal... Yet another GPS, maybe with a potentially better HDOP by a few %. Sorry, but that doesn't push my off my chair and IMHO that hardly justifies 5 blog posts in 3 months time.
Take a step back, read and understand! This a an open-source DIY-community, full of bright minds like Tridge and Randy and other developers. If you would come up with a really cool and innovative hardware product for a reasonable price, I'm fairly sure, that it wouldn't take much more than sending out a few samples to some developers to get your product integrated into the APM software platform. Good examples for that are the Piksi RTK GPS. Or the LIDAR-Lite.
We can add any sensors to board, but what about software support? I can mount LSM9DS0 without problem.