3D Robotics
From this week's Newsweek: "Defending against Drones: How our new favorite weapon in the war against terror could soon be used against us". Slashdotted and discussed here. Mentions us ;-)

Excerpt:

"This year the Pentagon will buy more unmanned aircraft than manned, and train more UAV pilots than traditional bomber and fighter pilots combined. As Gen. David Petraeus, head of the U.S. Central Command, put it in January, "We can't get enough drones."

But neither can our adversaries—who don't need their own network of satellites and supercomputers to deploy an unmanned plane. Wired magazine editor Chris Anderson built a version of the military's hand-tossed Raven surveillance drone for $1,000, while an Arizona-based anti-immigrant group instituted its own pilotless surveillance system to monitor the U.S.-Mexico border for just $25,000. Hitler's war machine may have lacked the ability to strike the American mainland during World War II. But half a century later, a 77-year-old blind man from Canada designed an unmanned system that in 2003 hopped the Atlantic from Newfoundland to Ireland.

.....

"The United States has not truly had to think about its air defenses—at home or abroad—since the Cold War. But it's time it did, because our current crop of weapons isn't well suited to dealing with these new systems. Smaller UAVs' cool, battery-powered engines make them difficult to hit with conventional heat-seeking missiles; Patriot missiles can take out UAVs, but at $3 million apiece such protection comes at a very steep price. Even seemingly unsophisticated drones can have a tactical advantage: Hizbullah's primitive planes flew so slowly that Israeli F-16s stalled out trying to decelerate enough to shoot them down.

To succeed in this revolution, we need something many competitor countries already have: a national robotics strategy. That means graduate scholarships, lab funding, and a Silicon Valley–style corridor for corporate development. Otherwise we are destined to depend on the expertise of others. Already a growing number of American defense and technology firms rely on hardware from China and software from India, a clear security concern."

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!

Join diydrones

Comments

  • no country even advanced its own defense by discouraging new ideas - including objects which may or may not be used as weapons. Cellphone arguably are very dangerous because they could be used to ...
  • T3
    "Hitler's war machine may have lacked the ability to strike the American mainland during World War II. But half a century later, a 77-year-old blind man from Canada designed an unmanned system that in 2003 hopped the Atlantic from Newfoundland to Ireland."
    -Ridiculisation of the competition:
    -they are not competent engineers, they are kids playing with dangerous toys
    -a blind old man, you see? you basically take toys from Walmart, some scotch tape and voila
    -they can turn out easily into monsters
    -spreading lack of technical knowledge (Chris's Easystar vs Raven)
    100% FUD
    Classical article paid by mil companies, nothing to do with freedom of speech, professionalism and the like. Pure business at its most counterproductive form.

    They are missing basic thing: an airplane that can lift a weapon that has 5m hit radius (Very small grenade) with 25m accuracy and has around 15min action delay (between launch and an action) is as good as a Golden Crossbow to kill a president in a crowded room: (don't smile: it's deadly, invisible to AMD radars, immediate and silent).
    You cannot destroy stationary object because they are too resistant, you cannot kill a small target (a person) with accuracy comparable to RC plane (so why not to use the 'proven technology'), you could scare a crowd but it is so easy to hit you would better use a mortar. This is a naive extrapolation or war machine propaganda into small scale. The danger not always scales up (1e6 atomic bombs is not worse than 1e3), and is not always scaling down (UAVs, a jar of nano tanks, machine guns that fit in a pocket).
  • Admin
    @Michael Zaffuto
    ,who would hold the yagi and take aim @ UAVwhile pumping 1KW RF into it? I am not sure if UAV will have lobotomy or not but the guy holding the yagi sure will have one :))
    A antenna Tracker will help :)
  • @TCIII -- Thanks. I just found it really amusing that this off-the-wall stuff gets found and then circulated.
  • "a 77-year-old blind man from Canada designed an unmanned system that in 2003 hopped the Atlantic from Newfoundland to Ireland."

    Every now and then I'll read an article with a topic that I happen to already know something about. Very frequently, a fact or two is simply wrong. Case in point, the 77-year-old blind man is Maynard Hill from Pennsylvania, not Canada. His plane flew from Canada--that much is true. What's scary is wondering how many of the "facts" I read in the other 99.9999% of articles about which I know nothing are also wrong. On the one hand, what's the big deal if an irrelevant fact is wrong? On the other hand, if it's irrelevant why is it mentioned?

    Click HERE for an article about Maynard Hill.
  • I have a plan - use the FCC make it illegal for start up electronics companies to be successful in your country - while less developed countries have no brakes on innovation (and jobs). (let me know how that works out for ya.)
  • Admin
    Paul,

    I saw the youtube link on one of the discussions on this Forum a while back and was able to find it again for my post.

    Regards,
    TCIII
  • The main concern is their use in traffic enforcement. That is going to suck. Been running stop signs & speeding as often as possible while we still have the chance.
  • @TCIII--It's one thing for people to make those things, but how do you ever come across that stuff on YouTube!!!??? Somehow, searching for a homemade autonomous AA gun on YouTube would just never occur to me. :)
  • Admin
    Chris,

    The hobbyists in our midsts already have a solution to combat enemy UAVs especially the small ones!

    www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMQ9c-A7idA

    Regards,
    TCIII
This reply was deleted.