Part Two: Here is the original picture of the finished product:
This is the second part of a 2-part series on 'How to build a High-Definition FPV UAV using a Raspberry PI with HD camera, using a high speed WiFi link.
In my first post on the subject (located here), I discussed the parts I used, and how to install them into a Hobby King Go-Discover FPV model.
In this post, I will discuss installing the Raspberry PI and the PI camera in the Go-Discover gimbals, and the software configuration for both the Raspberry PI and the ground station PC.
From the previous post, step 3 was completed by installing the Ubiquity Rocket M5 in the model. Now onto step 4:
Step 4: Install the Raspberry PI and PI Camera
Here is a photo of the position of the PI in the Go-Discover model:
The PI fits nicely just behind the camera gimbals, with the USB and HDMI ports on top. In the right side you can see the Cat5 network cable attached. This cable connects to the ethernet switch, which is also connected to the Rocket M5 input port.
The two cables shown on top are the servo control wires for the gimbals, which I have directly connected to channel 4 and 5 on my radio. I am using channel 4 (normally the rudder stick on my radio. Since there is no rudder on a flying wing, this is a convenient channel to use to move left and right with the camera. I have not (yet) moved to a head tracker, but if you already have that setup, just assign the channels accordingly.
To install the PI camera, remove the stock plate from the gimbals (for a GoPro), and mount the PI camera as shown in this photo:
The PI camera case fits very nicely into the slot, and again I used a small piece of velcro to hold it down. You could use a couple of small screws instead if you want a more secure hold. The two gimbals servos are also shown here. They are simple to install, just follow the Go-Discover instructions.
Here is a front view of the PI camera installed:
Here is the block diagram describing all the connections:
Some comments on my previous post suggested that it is possible to eliminate the ethernet switch and serial-to-ethernet converter using the Raspberry PI and a serial port on the PI. I believe this post describes how to talk to the PI via the NavLink, but in this case, I want to use the PI to bridge the connection from the ground station to the APM/PixHawk. Somebody please comment on this if you know more about it. I believe it would require a TCP/IP to serial link from the PI to the telemetry port on the APM, and some software on the PI to act as the bridge. The main connection to the ground station is via the Rocket M5 and TCP/IP, not through a telemetry link (900 Mhz or Zigbee like I used on my other models).
Step 5: Getting it all to work with software configuration (the really fun part starts now).
Check out this post on what others have done with streaming and the PI. My experiments showed that using GStreamer on both the PI and on Windows gives really good results with very low latency, if you use the right parameters.
Get GStreamer on the PI by following this blog. This is the same version of GStreamer that I am using on my setup.
Make sure your PI camera works ok by plugging in the PI to a standard monitor using the HDMI port and follow the instructions on the Raspberry PI website on how to get the camera up and running (without GStreamer). Once you have a working PI and camera, you can then proceed to stream things over the network.
Note: It is suggested that you first get the PI streaming video by plugging it directly into your local network where you can also connect your ground station PC with the correct IP addresses (without the Rocket M5). For my PI, I picked 192.168.1.2, and for the ground station, 192.168.1.1. Make sure you can ping the PI from your PC and the PC from the PI.
For streaming, you will also have to make sure all the ports you intent to use are open on the firewall (described later).
For the ground station PC, you can download GStreamer here. Make sure when you install, select to install everything , or full installation (not the default).
Here is the command I use for the PI to pipe the camera output to GStreamer:
raspivid -t 0 -w 1280 -h 720 -fps 30 -b 1700000 -o - | gst-launch1.0 -v fdsrc ! h264parse config-interval=1 ! rtph264pay ! udpsink host = 192.168.1.1 port= 9000
The command is explained as follows:
raspivid is the command to start the camera capture on the PI. The -w switch is for the width in pixels, and the -h switch is for the height. In this case, I am using 1280 X 720, but you can try any combination that fits your needs.
The -b switch is the bit rate for the sampling. In this case I chose 1.7mbs to send over the stream. Again you can experiment with higher or lower values. This settings seems to work good for me, and the latency is almost unnoticeable.
the "-o - |" is piping the output to gstreamer. Make sure you include the dash before the pipe "|" symbol.
For the GStreamer command, all the filters are separated with an exclamation point "!", as these are individual drivers that are part of GStreamer. Since the PI has hardware accelerated video, the output is in a format called "H264", which is a highly-compressed stream. The GStreamer filters are configured to transport the output via a UDP socket connection to the target PC. Notice the 'udpsink' element which specifies the host - in this case your ground station, and the UDP port. I am using port 9000, but you can use any open port on your system, but be sure to open the firewall or it won't work! You can also use TCP instead of UDP, but for such a data stream, I chose to use UDP since dropouts are certainly possible, and with UDP this is ok, but with TCP, you could have socket problems and higher latency.
Note: to get the PI to execute this command on boot, make a shell script with the above command and add it to your local.rc boot sequence. That way when the PI boots, you get the stream without having to log into the PI remotely.
For the ground station PC, once you have installed GStreamer and opened the correct ports, use this command (from the command prompt) to view the stream:
c:\gstreamer\1.0\x86_64\bin\gst-launch-1.0 udpsrc port=9000 ! application/x-rtp,encoding-name=H264,payload=96 ! rtph264depay ! avdec_h264 ! videoconvert ! autovideosink
If all goes well, you should see the PI camera output on your PC screen in a popup window. For those of you what want to use FPV goggles, you can connect to the HDMI port on your PC to display the output if your goggles support HDMI.
I have this command in a batch file (with a PAUSE) statement at the end to keep the window open.
WHEW! If you got this far, you are amazing.
The last step to complete the build is to connect to the APM from mission planner. The method I used to connect was to install a utility that converts a TCP connection to a virtual serial port, but I also think that directly connecting the mission planner to the TCP port will also work, however I have not tried it. I will post back later after trying it.
Here is the link to setup the serial to ethernet device to have an IP address and port.
Here is the link to the configuration utility for installing the virtual serial port.
Once you have a serial connection over TCP/IP working to the APM, you should be able to connect with Mission Planner. On the maiden flight, it worked perfectly, and I didn't see a single drop in the telemetry data or anything noticeable in the video transmission, however my first flight was limited to 2km.
The last step is to connect the Rocket M5 to the Nano M5 and test everything using the OTA (over the air) connection. If all is well, you are ready to fly! But be careful on your maiden, you just spent $700.
Finally, here is a photo of my Antenna Tracker with the Nano M5 attached. My next update will include a video of a longer flight.
Happy Flying!
Comments
@Dan
Ha!, that was the video my friend sent me. I didn't even look close, he said 40 i just looked quick! That makes a way more sense. I was really puzzled how they were getting that.
Also, keep in mind, if you are capturing at 30fps, the maximum theoretical latency is at least 33ms, not factoring in any transmission or processing delay. Obviously, that goes up with frame rate, but I'm not quite sure whether or not the GoPro would output 60fps on HDMI anyway.
@Bob, where did you see 40ms? I paused a couple of times and never saw less than 200ms, usually 300+. Keep in mind the timer app he is using is really showing centi-seconds, not milliseconds (only 2 decimal places).
@ Dan
Thats weird. I saw a couple youtube videos of HD from a gopro at 40 ms latency from a light bridge. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMxfh7ckGG0
@ Patrick,
I can get bursts at 120-150 ms under good lighting and still conditions, good wifi link, and when I used the "cropped" settings on the PI camera. When I really stress test the system, moving camera around quickly, going from light to dark, and most importantly use the pi setting for full field of view, latency jumps up to 200 or so, and encoding artifacts show up pretty bad. I would say average latency is around 200. For head tracking you need the 100 ms, and for rift based telepresence you have to have the field of view.
Don't know if its been brought up, but this is very interesting to me https://developer.qualcomm.com/blog/guest-blog-video-conferencing-l.... I would like to know the "cheat codes" they talk of to call the gstreamer API directly. When I drop my resolution down to what they used for the testing 640x480, I still don't get 50 ms, and I decode on a beastly alienware 18.4.
It's a really interesting challenge.
@Bob gotcha. I don't have a lightbridge, but I've played with one, and IMO it wasn't a better solution than what we have working here, with the exception of ease of setup.
@Dan
Honestly, I'm just playing around right now trying to see whats possible. I'm going to pick up a C920 and see how that goes. I'm impressed with the the teradeck which I've had hands on time with, and the light bridge videos I've seen, and would like to try to get a sub 200 dollar solution for all the diy'ers out there. It's not a software issuse, it is totally hardware right now. Might not be possible with today's technology.
@Bob, it sounds like you're looking for higher resolution, but if it is video quality you are concerned with, I would take a look at the C920. Many of us are using it with great results.
@bocorps - interesting, but looks heavy! I took even the base off mine for less weight. Additionally, I opened mine up and refocused it to get focus at infinity looking a bit better.
@Patrick, I totally agree price (and weight) is a big part of it for aircraft. I have a pi based stereo system on a alexmos gimble now. But there are ground based applications where better camera options would be nice. From reading all the post the pi camera developer posted, the pi camera is maxed out. 5MP sensor is the best its going to get for some time.
I also heard back from the sq600 people "Indeed, HDMI video input is one of the product's highlights, however, it is still a work in progress and it will require a few months to implement. You can see this on our OS coverage map table at: http://www.compulab.co.il/products/operating-systems-and-drivers-fo... from the Design resources tab: http://www.compulab.co.il/products/computer-on-modules/cm-qs600/#de...
We are sorry for the confusion, if this was not easily understandable from our web page. "
Which was is clear now but was not at the time I ordered it. I think I'm going to send it back and wait.
@Patrick, do you think we can power A+ directly from TP1 TP2 pads ?
I actually have a B+ and unlike AP, there are many pads to feed the Pi.