Press Release – FAA to Consider Exemptions for Commercial UAS Movie and TV Production

For Immediate Release

June 2, 2014
Contact: Les Dorr, Jr. or Alison Duquette 
Phone: (202) 267-3883

Seven Companies Petition to Fly Unmanned Aircraft before Rulemaking is Complete

WASHINGTON –The U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Aviation Administration today announced that seven aerial photo and video production companies have asked for regulatory exemptions that would allow the film and television industry to use unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) with FAA approval for the first time.  

If the exemption requests are granted, there could be tangible economic benefits as the agency begins to address the demand for commercial UAS operations. However, all the associated safety issues must be carefully considered to make sure any hazards are appropriately mitigated. The petitioner must still obtain operational approval from the FAA.

The Motion Picture Association of America facilitated the exemption requests on behalf of their membership. The firms that filed the petitions are all independent aerial cinematography professionals who collectively developed the exemption requests as a requirement to satisfy the safety and public interest concerns of the FAA, MPAA and the public at large.

The FAA has been working for several months to implement the provisions of Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 and move forward with UAS integration before proposing a small UAS rule. Companies from three industries besides film production have approached the FAA and are also considering filing exemption requests.  These industries include precision agriculture, power line and pipeline inspection, and oil and gas flare stack inspection.

The firms are asking the agency to grant exemptions from regulations that address general flight rules, pilot certificate requirements, manuals, maintenance and equipment mandates.  They are also asking for relief from airworthiness certification requirements as allowed under Section 333. Under that section of the law, certain airworthiness requirements can be waived to let specific UAS fly safely in narrowly-defined, controlled, low-risk situations.

To receive the exemptions, the firms must show that their UAS operations will not adversely affect safety, or provide at least an equal level of safety to the rules from which they seek the exemption.  They would also need to show why granting the exemption would be in the public interest. 

Currently, Certificates of Waiver or Authorization are available to public entities that want to fly a UAS in civil airspace. Common uses today include law enforcement, firefighting, border patrol, disaster relief, search and rescue, military training, and other government operational missions. Commercial operations are authorized on a case-by-case basis. A commercial flight requires a certified aircraft, a licensed pilot and operating approval. The exemption process under Section 333 provides an additional avenue for commercial UAS operations.

You can view the film & TV production company petitions at www.regulations.gov

For more information on the FAA and UAS, go to http://www.faa.gov/about/initiatives/uas/

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!

Join diydrones


  • Like I said, the key now is for us to create rules of operation based on our understanding and experience in this field. The FAA is involved and that's not going to just go away unless we create a structure to fill the vacuum.

  • Moderator

    How do you ask for an exemption to a rule that does not exist, the last I heard the case had been decided against the FAA who apparently have no rules to control UAV's. I know the FAA appealed but that does not change the rules , just the decision. 

  • We always knew that the regulations would grow out of the community of operators. Now is a critical time for all of us to perform our operations in a manner that instills trust with the public and the regulators. The FAA would love to responsibly absolve themselves of this pain-in-the-ass drone problem, we just need to reassure them that we are serious professionals (that comes straight from the source, BTW).

  • So, "exemptions" from non-existent regulations, eh? Wow.

This reply was deleted.