Fascinating NYU experiment reveals surprising data on fluid-dynamics for top-heavy airborne structures.  

From ScienceMag (video) via Wired Science

"Think that floating pyramids are more metaphysics than physics? Think again. Results just in from an experiment that levitated open-bottomed paper pyramids on gusts of air reveal a curious phenomenon: When it comes to drifting through the air, top-heavy designs are more stable than bottom-heavy ones. The finding may lead to robots that fly not like insects or birds but like jellyfish.

The researchers placed hollow paper pyramids inside the cylinder. The objects were about 1 to 5 centimeters high and were made of tissue paper or letter paper on carbon fiber supports, like tiny homemade kites. Physicist Bin Liu led the experiments, attaching a beadlike weight to a post running down the center of the pyramid and changing the height of the bead to give the object a different center of mass. Common sense says that the pyramid should be most stable when the bead is at the bottom of the post, like ballast in the hold of a ship. But when the team released the pyramids over the subwoofer, the opposite was true: the bottom-heavy pyramids were likely to flip over and fall, whereas the top-heavy ones remained upright and continued to hover (see first video), the group reports in an upcoming issue of Physical Review Letters.

Zhang's team suggests that flapping pyramid or cone robots could combine stability and maneuverability. They would quickly right themselves if they leaned further than 30° in any direction, but within 30°, they should move freely."

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!

Join diydrones


  • I gave this a little more thought and have a very simple theory about what's happening here.

    Building on Cliff-E's idea - but assuming the force's orientation to the cg is not the driving factor:
    Gravity has little actual bearing on fluid dynamics and in this case had distracted me from a more obvious explanation.

    While the lower center of gravity will force horizontal orientation it can also have adverse effect on a surface's natural tendency to align and balance itself by seesawing. There's probably some well established theory/Law/equation on this.

    As the bottom-weighted pyramid begins to tilt and the high pressure side rises, the downward force from the bottom weight condenses those air molecules by pulling the elevated edge down jut enough to trap the high pressure until it reaches a 'boiling' point and then topples over.

    The top-weighted configuration on the other hand has a subtle reactionary / pendulum^-like effect. When air pressure increases on one side, the weight adds just enough additional downward force to the lower (low pressure) side to increase that pressure and balance it off. Alternately / concurrently the top-weight may be 'torquing' the high edge to tip just enough to release the pressure without toppling, then levels off.

    …or it could just be this subwoofer artificial thrust environment 'insulating' the top-weight in a vortex [Coanda/gyroscopic-like effect] which would be a huge letdown.

    For anyone interested, I've been trying to adopt a fresh empirical perspective on things like this (and life in general) after having read this riveting article on how our notions of causality are wreaking havoc on scientific method and progress.

  • I was looking around for some rcmodel airplanes and came across this site...I joined it because it has some very good information about all kinds of things...I also like the content.  If you get a chance please go by my site and take a look.

    Many thanks and keep up the good was a Pleasure being here.
  • Who would have imagined that people who build robots for fun would also be fans of science fiction? ;-)

    On topic, the natural flight correction is particularly interesting to me. I am already thinking of potential applications that would be enhanced by this kind of design.

  • looks like there are too many sf fans on diydrones

  • P.S. -- This fictional pyramid was more-or-less hollow.  It landed over another pyramid, I believe.  Fact following fiction?

  • It looks like those Stargate aliens were on to something...


  • Back to the article, one can say the resultant force is under the cg in the top heavy scenario vs. the force on the bottom heavy scenario (since a force is generated at the pyramid structure). Very possible the resultant force is acting further away from the cg in the top-heavy config, which could lead to more stability.

    Then again, the second video showing the swirls is very interesting and likely the real explanation (pushing vs pulling).

  • Hmm, Lucas is not that bad, please.  But, he'd have a hard time defending against lawsuits from Frank Herbert's family, give that so much of the concept of Tattooine was stolen straight of of Dune. 

  • Unfortunately, Lucas owns the copyright on the words "pyramid" & "for".  He'd go after you, then he'd sue Pirate Bay for $100 trillion.

  • Yes, I know. Imperial-class Star Destoyers also operate in the vacuum of space and have little concern with aero/fluid dynamics - but they do look a little top-heavy, so.   i didn't get it either till I read the article ;)

This reply was deleted.