Top-Heavy Airborne Pyramids for Improved Stability

Fascinating NYU experiment reveals surprising data on fluid-dynamics for top-heavy airborne structures.  

From ScienceMag (video) via Wired Science

"Think that floating pyramids are more metaphysics than physics? Think again. Results just in from an experiment that levitated open-bottomed paper pyramids on gusts of air reveal a curious phenomenon: When it comes to drifting through the air, top-heavy designs are more stable than bottom-heavy ones. The finding may lead to robots that fly not like insects or birds but like jellyfish.

The researchers placed hollow paper pyramids inside the cylinder. The objects were about 1 to 5 centimeters high and were made of tissue paper or letter paper on carbon fiber supports, like tiny homemade kites. Physicist Bin Liu led the experiments, attaching a beadlike weight to a post running down the center of the pyramid and changing the height of the bead to give the object a different center of mass. Common sense says that the pyramid should be most stable when the bead is at the bottom of the post, like ballast in the hold of a ship. But when the team released the pyramids over the subwoofer, the opposite was true: the bottom-heavy pyramids were likely to flip over and fall, whereas the top-heavy ones remained upright and continued to hover (see first video), the group reports in an upcoming issue of Physical Review Letters.

Zhang's team suggests that flapping pyramid or cone robots could combine stability and maneuverability. They would quickly right themselves if they leaned further than 30° in any direction, but within 30°, they should move freely."

Views: 1685

Comment by Ellison Chan on February 8, 2012 at 4:42pm

But aren't both the Imperial Cruiser and a pyramid bottom heavy?

Comment by Shannon Morrisey on February 8, 2012 at 4:45pm

Yes, I know. Imperial-class Star Destoyers also operate in the vacuum of space and have little concern with aero/fluid dynamics - but they do look a little top-heavy, so.   i didn't get it either till I read the article ;)

Comment by Jack Crossfire on February 8, 2012 at 5:06pm

Unfortunately, Lucas owns the copyright on the words "pyramid" & "for".  He'd go after you, then he'd sue Pirate Bay for $100 trillion.

Comment by Ellison Chan on February 8, 2012 at 5:15pm

Hmm, Lucas is not that bad, please.  But, he'd have a hard time defending against lawsuits from Frank Herbert's family, give that so much of the concept of Tattooine was stolen straight of of Dune. 

Comment by Cliff-E on February 8, 2012 at 8:17pm

Back to the article, one can say the resultant force is under the cg in the top heavy scenario vs. the force on the bottom heavy scenario (since a force is generated at the pyramid structure). Very possible the resultant force is acting further away from the cg in the top-heavy config, which could lead to more stability.

Then again, the second video showing the swirls is very interesting and likely the real explanation (pushing vs pulling).

Comment by Paul Marsh on February 9, 2012 at 5:27am

It looks like those Stargate aliens were on to something...

Comment by Paul Marsh on February 9, 2012 at 5:29am

P.S. -- This fictional pyramid was more-or-less hollow.  It landed over another pyramid, I believe.  Fact following fiction?

Comment by Anish on February 9, 2012 at 9:57am

looks like there are too many sf fans on diydrones

Comment by Ben Halsted on February 9, 2012 at 11:24am

Who would have imagined that people who build robots for fun would also be fans of science fiction? ;-)

On topic, the natural flight correction is particularly interesting to me. I am already thinking of potential applications that would be enhanced by this kind of design.

Comment by Gerry McConnell on February 9, 2012 at 8:15pm

I was looking around for some rcmodel airplanes and came across this site...I joined it because it has some very good information about all kinds of things...I also like the content.  If you get a chance please go by my site and take a look.

Many thanks and keep up the good was a Pleasure being here.


You need to be a member of DIY Drones to add comments!

Join DIY Drones

© 2019   Created by Chris Anderson.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service