ZeroUAV YS-X4 teardown

3689493405?profile=originalSo no completely trusting that Santa had gotten the message, I made sure that there at least was one present under the tree that I would like.

The YS-X4 is the latest multi-rotor autopilot from ZeroUAV, and their entry into the relatively low priced hobby segment. Since this blog will be a hardware teardown, I will not go into details about performance and features. More information can be found in detail at the official site or in the RCGroups thread.

So having opened my present (Ooh!! A YS-X4!!! Just what I wanted!! How did I know!?), I was curious just how a hobby grade autopilot made by a serious industrial UAV company would be designed. So naturally dismantling the autopilot unit seemed like the sensible thing to do.

The main components in the package are (top, left to right):

GPS unit, status LED, autopilot, WiFI unit , USB interface and power supply module. And then there is the usual assortment of servo wires, GPS standoff mount and such.


First let's start by physically comparing the YS-X4 autopilot with the APM 2.5 (from the first batch, so there is no casing).

The YS-X4 autopilot unit is a solid block of machined, anodized aluminum with horizontal connectors and weighs 106 grams. Slightly longer and wider then the APM, and at least twice as high. So obviously it will require a bit more space to install. But the thing is very solid. Feels like you could clobber someone to death, and not even get a reboot. Very good first impression.

Opening up the casing, I was surprised how little unused space there is. Clearly they have made the casing as compact as possible, with the electronics they wanted to use.



The system is a two board stack with the IMU unit and connectors at the bottom (left picture), and processor unit at the top (right picture).



3689493477?profile=originalThe IMU unit in particular is very impressive with sensors built inside a solid piece of metal to ensure rigidity, and then mounted using internal vibration dampening. A black piece of foam on the processing board, is there so that it presses down on the IMU unit when the boards are stacked together. I decided to leave the IMU unit alone. At least until I have had a chance to fly the system once or twice. But judging by the rest of the system, I would not be surprised to find well known reputable sensors from Analog Devices and Freescale. Just like in the professional YS-X6 version (ADXRS620, ADXL203, MPXH6115A).

The processor board on top of the stack has two chips of interest.

- Atmel ARM920T 32-bit RISC processor

- Altera Cyclone FPGA

I can only speculate but my guess would be that the FPGA is used for radio inputs and motor output PWM's, and perhaps some of the more intensive sensor fusion maths.

The ARM CPU then handles the rest of the programmable logic as needed.

This is the exact same components found in the professional YS-X6 version. In other words a dedicated system with component selected that best suite the task. Considering this is a hobby range product, I am very impressed by the components used.

So in conclusion, the ZeroUAV YS-X4 seem to use more or less the exact same components found in the more expensive YS-X6 version. As such it is logical to assume the most of the programming used is also the same. So performance should be close if not identical to the $1000+ professional YS-X6. Most feature limitations (like only 6 motor outputs if you want to use a camera gimbal) are there to segment the two products in the marked. Considering the price ($450 - $640 depending on software options), this is impressive. Sure, nowhere near the price of the 3DRobotics APM, but then again the YS-X4 has MUCH more impressive hardware and ZeroUAV doesn't get most the software developed for free.

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!

Join diydrones


  • Developer

    Steve, yes it should not have any problem flying the S800 system.

  • Great infromation, do you know if this can be used on a DJI S-800, with the built-in ESC's??

  • I have the full blown YS-X6 with the full upgrade way-points and no limitations. So far the first few flights Ive done are just remarkable. The stability is nothing Ive had before on the APMs and the Auto RTL and landing is simply flawless. Its eases down softly without a hint of a bounce and then turns itself off.  here is my blog on this
    It also can be controlled using an Android phone which Ive yet to test.  The only con Ive had so far is the appalling user manual which is a total night mare to try figure out. Plus getting internet and GCS maps isn't to easy to do simultaneously.
  • mpu6050???

  • Interesting read.  Will you be posting a comparison review after some flights?  I think that would be highly beneficial seeing that most of the other threads on the x4 don't have much in the way of reviews

  • Developer

    Yes, the magnetometers are placed inside the GPS unit to get separation from the noisy ESC and the rest of the electronics.

    Timecop over at RCGroups has a teardown of the YS-X6. The GPS unit is the same as used with the YS-X4, so the digital compass is a HMC5883L.

  • what sensors do it use?

  • Developer

    Hi John, thanks for sharing! It's cool to check their choices on components and the whole hardware.

    @Gary: usually the magnetometer goes inside the GPS housing. E.g. on DJI it goes underneath the ground plate  of the GPS board (the opposite side of the ceramic antenna). Probably it is the same for the YS-X4 system.

  • Seems very well designed and well integrated, but free firmware is also open firmware which lets you do your own thing and although the APM is never quite tuned to anybodies needs it does continually get better.

    It is interesting that they have gone to so much trouble to vibration isolate what seems to be the sensor board while hard mounting the processor board.

    The heavy duty aluminum case also seems very nice, but I was wondering if it has a built in magnetometer because it could possibly be interfered with by the case (steel would shield but aluminum only dampens Earth magnetic field). Their web site and even the downloadable PDF are a little light when it comes to disclosing the actual hardware.

    Their web site also has a very nice very pro quadcopter with a through the center counter weighted Steadicam type free swiveling camera mount.

    All in all some very serious stuff.

This reply was deleted.