The latest US purchase of Raven UAVs was announced:

"AeroVironment, Inc. (AV) (NASDAQ:AVAV) announced today that it received an order valued at $46,226,984 under an existing contract with the U.S. Army. The order comprises 123 new digital Raven small unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) and initial spares packages as well as 186 digital retrofit kits for the U.S. Marine Corps. The order also includes 339 digital retrofit kits for the U.S. Army."

Assuming that those "digital retrofits" are just switching out the video transmitters to encrypt the signal, which is not a big deal, this sounds like ~$300,000 per plane, which is about the same price as the similarly-sized Wasp


I know that a Raven clone, APM and some decent video equipment is not quite milspec, but given that it costs about 1/1,000th as much and does more or less the same thing, why aren't the military considering cheaper alternatives?


(Yes, I'm aware the real Raven is much more robust, the onboard optics are much better, the Raven kits include ground stations and all that other stuff. But still: are they one thousand times better?)

Views: 8732

Comment by Rupert Kent on January 1, 2011 at 10:06am
Doesn't sound like it's too far off the mark.
Comment by Chuck Norton on January 3, 2011 at 1:57am
The $35,000 does not surprise me. Considering the quality of optics for both day and night use and that much of the tech is closed source proprietary. The large price tag is not that excessive to me. Another thing to take in consideration is what the RQ-11 has to offer, the ability to provide immediate observational capabilities to ground leadership. While the Army is embracing UAVs at fast pace, not everyone on the ground will have access to Shadows or the Grey Eagle when they need it. Compare the flight hours costs of light aircraft to the
RQ-11 purchase price makes it a bargain in the eyes Pentagon types that manage the acquisition and procurement of aviation systems.

There was a interesting documentary that came out last May about a group of Danish Soldiers that deployed to Afghanistan. There was a good amount footage of the RQ-11 in action. One scene that impressed me was how they would use the Raven to find targets for mortar teams. RQ-11 serve as both recon platform and provide on the spot battle damage assessment. All the while allowing the commander to watch it as it happen on the GCS connected to overhead projector.

What does $35,000/$300,000 price tag mean to the diydrones community. If people are willing to pay $35,000 for micro UAV, you could easily sell some on one that is a tenth of the cost and is close to what the Raven offers.

Just my thoughts..

A neat fact about the founder of AeroViroment, Paul MacCready designed the first human powder aircraft and was model plane enthusiast.

Comment by Krzysztof Bosak on January 3, 2011 at 7:25am

"A neat fact about the founder of AeroViroment, Paul MacCready designed the first human powder aircraft and was model plane enthusiast."

He was also born in a wealthy family what gave him at least access to startup money and contacts with reasonnable ppl in world military superpower ON THE RISE. So let's don't be naive.


I agree 35KUSD for raven is ok in current conditions.

1-5KUSD is plain stupid ignoring delivery chain and subcomponents.

while 10KUSD was not to be witnessed in an economy driven by old companies and uneven access to capital.

Comment by Christian - on January 4, 2011 at 5:43pm

Ok, After this post, I Agree!  300,000 could get you Cesna and the Short Circuit Robot to Fly it...  Way too much, but then again after watching Youtube of all these Raven Video's, they Crash the Raven Everytime on the landing, it falls right apart and gets put right back together..  The rate I am going through planes, I am going to be spending 300,000 soon on easystars..  I kind of want the raven now...  Is there a link to buy the same Airframe? quality wise in where its snap on and go? and I can crash over and over?




You need to be a member of DIY Drones to add comments!

Join DIY Drones

© 2019   Created by Chris Anderson.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service