This week the Raptor 140 completed a 30km (18.6mi) fully autonomous flight! It only used 58% of it's 8.8Ah batteries, giving it a potential ability to cover 51.2km (31.8mi) on a single charge, the whole time flying at 75kph (47mph) for 40+ minutes! Impressive...
Some additional metrics to consider: is average amp draw was 12.8amps, or 21% of the 60amp esc, also it had a 5.8km/Ah (3.6mi/Ah) efficiency, meaning that if I added an additional amp hour of battery life, it could cover an additional 5.8km or 3.6mi. The original Raptor did an average of 5.5km/Ah.
Next week I'll start pushing the speed limit, seeing how fast and far the 140 can go. My end goal is to be able to cruise at 100kph (62mph) and still have a reasonable efficiency.
Also, I've been asked by dozens of people if I'd make a 140 for them, so I will! Starting in November I'll start selling Raptor 140 kits on my website: MyGeekShow.com. I plan on shipping worldwide and will have kits available starting at $89.99.
See you next week!
-Trent
Raptor 140 Stats:
Weight: 1653g
Max Flight Time: 60min
Max Range: 50km
Stall Speed: 25kph
Cruise Speed: 75kph
Max Speed: 127kph
Radio Range: 1.5km
The equipment on it:
Autopilot: APM2.6 https://store.3drobotics.com/products/apm-2-6-kit-1
FPV/Onboard Camera: http://www.foxtechfpv.com/horyzonhd-full-hd-1080p-fpv-camera-v3-p-877.html
Radio Tx: ParkeFlyer Turnigy 9x Tx: http://parkeflyer.com/
Reciever: 6ch FlySky http://www.hobbypartz.com/79p-r6b-receiver.html
Telemtry: 915mhz 100mW 3DR http://store.3drobotics.com/products/3dr-radio-telemetry-kit-915-mhz
Battery: 4.4Ah 30C Sky Lipo: http://www.hobbypartz.com/77p-sl4400-3s1p-30c-3333.html
ESC: 60A Brushless http://www.hobbypartz.com/proton60aair.html
Motor: 3542 1450kv brushless http://hobbyking.com/hobbyking/store/uh_viewItem.asp?idProduct=38700
Prop: 10x6 Carbon Fiber Folding http://www.hobby-lobby.com/10x6_carbon_fiber_cam_blade_797_prd1.htm
Servos: 11g digital http://hobbyking.com/hobbyking/store/uh_viewItem.asp?idProduct=42620
UBEC (for FPV camera): 3A http://hobbyking.com/hobbyking/store/uh_viewItem.asp?idProduct=4319
Learn More:
Raptor Details: http://www.mygeekshow.com/theairplanes/Raptor.html
USA Trip Details: http://www.mygeekshow.com/usatrip/
Follow the Show:
Website: http://www.mygeekshow.com
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/MyGeekShow
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mygeekshow
Google+:http://plus.google.com/116950154481685699344
Skype: MyGeekShow
UStream: http://www.ustream.tv/channel/mygeekshow
Filmed, Edited, Produced and Published by Trent in Arkansas, USA
Comments
Agreed=), Nathaniel Caner
Good video Trent just consider everything when flying long range and the outcome if something goes horribly wrong.
@BluSky1
As I said before, we have taken this off-topic enough and I won't continue this debate here Let's get back on topic and allow Trent's post to continue. I have sent you a Friend Request and would encourage you to accept it if you would like to continue this debate. Either that or submit a blog post of your own on the subject.
Regards,
Nathaniel ~KD2DEY
So what your saying is the FAA is allowing a AMA to make laws.. ROFL
Try that in court =)
You should get a lawyer to explain this to you and research it for you like I have
Sec 336 says "guidelines" the AMA is not allowed to create enforceable policy so it wont matter what the 2014 AMA "guidelines" say =)
I discourage anyone doing anything dangerous and All of my flights are LOS and under 400 Feet.
Frankly we have enough laws in this country already. If you hurt someone or damage property or invade someone's privacy as result of your actions the means should not matter if you used a brick, a gun, a rc plane or rc helicopter.
Just like the idiot who flew the phantom in Manhattan and endangered many lives the laws are already in place to deal with this behavior. lock him up.
Guideline
is a statement by which to determine a course of action. A guideline aims to streamline particular processes according to a set routine or sound practice. By definition, following a guideline is never mandatory. Guidelines are not binding and are not enforced.
@BlueSky1
Correct, there is no altitude limit set in that document. However two things, first I didn't make reference to you specifically about altitude limits, only the fact that there were laws in general that applied to model aircraft. Second, point #2 in Section 336 of PLAW 112-95 states:
The AMA is our "community based" organization here in the USA, and while there rules don't currently prohibit flight above 400', it is discouraged and will likely change in the AMA's 2014 rules.
Your first definition of "Line of Sight" is the one we're looking for here.
@Trent
Sorry for taking you post off-topic, I won't go here again. Keep up the good work, just weigh the advice carefully.
Best Regards,
Nathaniel ~KD2DEY
The legal definition of
"Line of Sight."
1: a line from an observer's eye to a distant point
2: the line between two points; specifically : the straight path between a transmitting antenna (as for radio or television signals) and a receiving antenna when unobstructed by the horizon
@BluSky1
You are correct in that AC91-57 are guidelines only, and that following those guidelines are voluntary. However there are laws currently in effect that do apply to model aircraft. PLAW 112-95 in effect since February 2012 Section 336 (Special Rule For Model Aircraft) basically puts into law what previously was only a guideline in AC91-57.
You can read through Section 336 of PLAW 112-95 (starting on pg 67) on the FAA.gov website.
Regards,
Nathaniel ~KD2DEY
Great flight Trent, As someone who has gotten a lot of attention lately.
There are no rules that FAA currently has that govern Model Airplanes there are only guidelines. if you go outside of those guidelines and hurt people or cause property damage expect uncle sam to sock it to you =)
Already done... Altitude 3800m
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNEPidLLO4E
You should also remove the camera on the nose it must be adding a whack of drag
the bottom line is that if you want to optimize you need to have solid data ( and a program to gather that is a lot of work in itself ) but then you can expect to really improve. but of course the empirical approach is fine too. after all the most important part is to have fun.
yes when the propeller tip reaches the sound barrier a lot of complex things occur that are not good for the efficiency.
here you can find a simple calculator of motor/ airframe/ prop matching. do not take the absolute values literally it is just for you to see the impact of matching. but if you plug in your setup you will see that the efficiency is barely at 50 % now if you just move from 1:1 ratio and 10x6 prop to 1.5:1 gear ratio and 14x9 prop the efficiency is above 75%