It's time for the third round of the third round of the second season of the Trust Time Trial (T3) competion! Now that the weather is improving, there are no excuses for not participating. Valuable prizes await!
This the Reliability Round. Our Judge, Gary Mortimer, describes the rules below:
-------------------------------------- RULES ------------------------
Point of order first: All T3 entries should be flown away from built up areas. Should you have any fly aways or incidents its best to have them miles from anyone else.
The aim of this round is to show reliability.
A very simple task: autonomously fly to a point that you have chosen that is at least 300 metres from your takeoff point (100m for copters). At an altitude of 75 meters (25m for copters) autonomously take a single photo of your point, then return to launch, land (manually or autonomously) and do it all again. Repeat this for a total of five flights.
Your entry should show your take off and landing times for each flight as well as KMLs showing the slight path. As always, post your entries in the comments below.
Each individual image will be compared and the person with the most shots with the chosen point in the centre of the image wins.
Honesty is everything here, don't discover that by chance a point you didn't select is in the centre of each shot and then tell us that's what you were after all along.
But.....
If you can make something interesting with your shots extra points will be forthcoming
You might make a map using MapKnitter. Have a look around here to find out what its all about here. Do something with Photosynth, ICE or any of the other similar mapping products springing up. Wouldn't it be nice to have a DIYD generated layer of opensource map images out there!
So in summary one day, five flights, five photos. Extra points for creative use of mapping software/services.
What you do with any other images is up to you. Impress us.
Why the pub challenges in the image above? Well I was looking at a dart board when I thought of it.
As an aside the area in the picture will be underwater next year, a dam wall is being built on the right. The big circles are irrigation centre pivots just the sort of thing a farmer might be interested at looking at from a UAS
-----------------------------------------------------------
There will be three winners in each category (planes and copters), with the #1s getting a $100 gift certificate at the DIY Drones store and #2 and #3 getting $25 each.
All entrants who successfully compete the course with a copter, regardless of place in the judging, will receive a flying robot merit badge!
Deadline is Sunday, May 13th, at midnight PST.
Comments
brakar: I use Pentax Optio cameras, which shoot faster than 1 frame/second in continuous shooting mode, so that's more than fast enough at 75m. Are most compact cameras slower than that? We could certainly increase the altitude to 100m (330 feet) if so, but at that point it's very hard to see detail on the ground and you're quite close to the regulatory barriers of 400ft.
I think it really comes down to what cameras are capable of these days. Do you know what the typical continuous shooting speed of the average modern compact camera is these days? I also have a Canon s90, which does 0.9 fps (which would also be sufficient for this contest) and that's described as "distinctly average" in reviews.
Robert: Links to all previous contests are here. Videos and other submission material are in the comments of each.
Brakar: Fair point. I think 100m is too high, since it's very close to the 400ft legal ceiling. But how about 75m?
Does anybody have some pointers to triggering a camera? I was going to try the glued-on servo technique, but if there's a nice way for the ardupilot to trigger the shutter that would be great.
I was thinking of CHDK controlling a small canon cam. Has anybody tried that?
http://chdk.wikia.com/wiki/CHDK
@Stephen, if you can pull it off with a Rover, I'm sure you'll be at least deserving of an Honourable Mention! I think the test you propose is pretty good. Doesn't have to be a disk. Could be anything that is supposed to replicate a ground target. A rock, an iron (to see if it was left plugged in) or a hazardous materials rail car on a derailed train.
Krzys: Good catch. Those altitude figures were supposed to be feet, not meters. I've now updated and expressed the targets in meters.
smbody wrote:
"Maybe I try this one litle bit modified, low passes near launch point between "stages"."
So, is low pass below say 30m agl above launch point counted/allowed as landing or do we want to eat the dirt (testing lens protection etc)?
BTW 130m AGL is slightly above 400ft AGL. How about 122m or 120m.
The go pro can take a snapshot every 2 sec . The gopro2 can take 2 snapshot each second
Hi Chris,
is there a place, that i you can see a T-3 standings?
@Chris and Robert -- Right, thanks. That's a new and interesting challenge for me, since I've only used a video camera, to date.
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
of 4 Next