You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!

Join diydrones

Comments

  • Looks like alot of members here spend way to much time worrying about how other pople conduct themselves. Based on the post in this thread and the trappy thread I get the feeling alot of folks here are afraid to live life.

    Just saw this.

    If only you knew.  LOL

    In my life I have done:

    - Rock Climbing, including one multi-pitch

    - White water kayaking and rafting

    - Off-road motorcycle racing

    - Car based motorsports including autocross, open track days, and rally.

    How is this different than flying quads in cities?  Easy, because I made the choice to risk my own life, and the only lives at risk are my own and people who chose to participate with me.  

    Flying quadcopters, airplanes, etc. dangerously "over crowd or close to other people "risks everybody else's health and safety "while you  are safe" from "your reckless behavior".  That's the difference.  < edited by Mod to avoid mis-understanding>

  • Another Naza guy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cm1hOuv_uSY (it's naza - mentioned in a german forum) .

    It's just a matter of time when somthing drastic happens and the copter manhunt begins.

    Well, Morli 10K is something to laugh at when you are good in monetizing that risky stuff and place yourself as an fpv professional on tv talkshows....

  • I hope the NYPD nail this guy for reckless endangerment. I know that most drone hobbyists and the professional drone community would endorse this view. I am not a citizen of the USA so I can do nothing - but you guys in the States could make you views public instead of just discussing it in a forum. Is there now a case for some form of self regulation and would that even work?

    Alan

  • Amen to that CliffN. :)

  • I doubt Geo-Fence would work as well as all other GPS option, lots of obstruction and radio noise in cities.

    true sense people claim technology is getting smarter, the problem is People using them are getting dumber.

  • this part below ,Doc Hicks is exactly what i have been trying to say

    But some of the rules proposed by the community are to close to what a senator would do, banning or heavily regulating

    What I see is a big enough increase in personal and property damage for a Senator looking to make a name for him/herself introducing a bill to ban these "Dangerous toys"

    So the government turns to the manufacturers (ie 3D Robotics) and asks them what they have done to protect the public, and all 3DR can say is "we put a warning in the manual" then 3DR could see their 30 million dollar investment go up in (magic) smoke.

    It's 3DR's Nelly, more then any other product, that has hit that magic spot of low price and hi tech. You don't even need a TX to fly it. Out of the box you can link it to a smart phone and geo-send it off to fly itself anywhere you choose,

    It's great business for 3DR to sell thousands of Nelly's (and they will) but the statistical probability of accidents and/or idiots increases, and the sooner it comes to that Senator's attention."

  • we aren't upset but we will be when the ban hammer falls, the fact is something needs to be done!

  • I'm not as upset about this as some of the rest of you seem to be. Sure it was a very careless an thoughtless action on the part of the operator, but realisitically shouldn't we almost expect this to happen? Afterall, the growthrate of this hobby is large and every day there are more and more people flying planes, quads, etc.   Considering that almost all of us drive an automobile (statistically speaking) which arguably has an equal or greater ability to mame and kill, I figure this is simply a sign of the times. Consider the thought that every day you pass by countless people on the road that could instantly kill you just by THEM having a moment where they aren't concentrated. Anyhow, I'm not trying to provoke, just hoping it is all taken with a grain of salt.

  • Doc hicks, what you are proposing is regulation and ruling, when all that is needed is advice and hints.

    perhaps a better solution as i said previously,Make anyone who uses any software that enables RC flight to complete a 5 min wizard that warns of the dangers and inappropriate behaviors and quizzes to make sure they know

  • and who is to edit the code?, who is to update it, i can see abuse as hackers block everywhere or diable the block.

    Our environment is too rapidly hanging to impose these sorts of limits, i mean obvious areas could be blacked liek air bases, airports etc but cities ect should not be.

    There is helping the newbies and there is creatin huge barriers to entry, i started this whole warning idea but then people are taking it to far.

    You idea to closely falls into the the fuddy duddies who complain about back in their day, they had to build their models out of balsa and now anyone can just fly in their area with foam etc

    limiting people simply because they bought rather than built is ludicrous, how do you think everyone gets into the hobby now adays, they buy a toy version find it coll but limited so build one.

    you idea would entirely kill the toy market and entry hobby grade models

This reply was deleted.