If youfind theright combination ofdifferentpitch,thepropellerscanbe run at thesamespeedwithoutlosingefficiency.
Nota bigproblemevenwiththe sameprops, becausewhenyou areflying, thecorrectionof theyawcomponentrun the propsina different speed.Onlyforalimited time(eg. hovering )the prop run atthe same speed, which is whyI entered the5%
Interesting! Running the top propellers5% slower? Wonder if using a different pitch would do the same? Thanks for the feedback need all the advice I can get. I'm desperately trying to make good choices for hardware on my first purchases, no room left in the workshop for dead projects.
It istrue,coaxloses10 to 20% efficiency.However,inmysoftware,thepropellersaboverunat 5% lessthan the lower prop. IMHO forflying timeismoreimportant tousepropellersandenginesthat workformostof the timeintheirrangeof maximum efficiency. Theproject is still inprivate,before making them publicI have torefinesomethingssuch asreplacing the armmitepro with SuperPro to have more spaceforcode
Impressive, like to see more detail on the build. Thinking of building a tricopter or better yet a Y6 as my first multi-rotor. Really impressed with the overall stability and performance of the Y6. Put off by the apparent loss of efficiency for the upper prop. There are many claims losses of 10 to 20% unless the vertical distance between rotors is large. Does that loss directly effect flight time? Appreciate any advice.
Comments
Danilo, how is the project going? Are you interested in sharing your code?
By the way, to Whipple who wrote "Did you take physics at all". Did you take english at all?
Who, what, where? What is the point.
The frame is Q4 Y6 400 here
If you find the right combination of different pitch, the propellers can be run at the same speed without losing efficiency.
Not a big problem even with the same props, because when you are flying, the correction of the yaw component run the props in a different speed. Only for a limited time (eg. hovering ) the prop run at the same speed, which is why I entered the 5%
Hi all,
I updated the post with a picture with some hardware details
It is true, coax loses 10 to 20% efficiency. However, in my software, the propellers above run at 5% less than the lower prop.
IMHO for flying time is more important to use propellers and engines that work for most of the time in their range of maximum efficiency.
The project is still in private, before making them public I have to refine some things such as replacing the armmite pro with SuperPro to have more space for code
Hi is it an open source project ? I have coridium board here to test
good job, very stable , god for aerial filming