It's been a while since I've posted an update on the progress of the AutoQuad flight controller. The event that we've all been waiting for has arrived with ST Micro's announcement and subsequent release of their STM32F4 product line. As expected, the micro-controller is pin for pin compatible with their STM32F2 series which the AQ v6.1 hardware was designed for. This meant it was a drop-in replacement. The most important new feature of the chip is the implementation of ARM's Cortex M4 core with a hardware FPU! This means that we can now do floating point operations in a single clock cycle. All forms of add / subtract / multiply / integer conversion, etc are single clock cycle instructions with the divide and square root instructions taking 14 cycles. This is a significant step forward for math hungry applications like AutoQuad.
As soon as I could get my hands on one (around November I think) I had it on a board working to port my ground Unscented Kalman Filter code to fit into the 168MHz MCU. With some optimizations, it ended up fitting with processing room to spare. The current version leaves ~40% idle time during flight. The filter is interesting because it brings all of the important estimated states and observations under a single mathematical model. This means that each observation can influence any number of state estimates if there is determined to be co-variance between them. The theoretical performance improvements over my old fixed gain techniques is high. 17 states and 16 process noise terms are estimated at 200Hz observed by 13 sensor measurements.
A benefit to using such a filter onboard is that it can adapt to changing variance of sensors and measurements on the fly. This removes the need to do ground based flight calibration simulations which was a drawback to the original fixed gain methods. Once you have a calibrated IMU, it can provide accurate state estimates "out of the box." While this is nice, the biggest improvement is the accuracy of the state estimates it can produce. States like 3D accelerometer bias and 3D rate gyro bias are critical to accurate attitude estimates which is the only way that you can propagate acceleration measurements through velocity and position estimates with any kind of accuracy.
Other than the upgrade of the MCU, the hardware is mostly unchanged from the original v6.1 layout. However, there have been a lot of new features added to the firmware since last year. What I call DVH (dynamic velocity hold) allows the pilot to control the craft's velocity in 3 dimensions while AQ handles everything else. Let go of the sticks and the machine holds position. AQ now speaks mavlink so it can be configured and controlled from any ground station that supports the protocol. A comprehensive parameter set has been established that allows configuration of almost all aspects of operation. Gimbal support and expanded mission capabilities have been added. 1-wire support for pre and post flight communications with ESC32. Too many more to list here.
With the help of Max Levine I created this video to demonstrate the autonomous mission capabilities of the current firmware (version 6.6):
If you use the uBlox LEA-6T as the onboard GPS module, AQ can record raw satellite observations to its uSD card along with the normal flight log. With this data and data from a local base station, you can use post RTK to get extremely accurate position and velocity estimates (~ centimeter accuracy.) In fact, I use the RTK velocity estimates as an absolute data point in scoring the filter's performance in the ground simulations used to tune the variance and noise parameters used by the UKF. Future work might include onboard RTK calculations using a linux based application processor mounted on a daughter board. This would bring the system's performance to an entirely new level.
Here is what the actual flight path looked like of the flight shown in the above video using post processed RTK:
I need to thank the small group of people who have worked very hard to test, write utility software and interfaces, create documentation and generally improve the AQ platform. It is still very far from a finished, polished flight controller, but it has come a long way because of their help.
As with ESC32, I have decided to release the AutoQuad FC firmware under an open source license. It can be found at:
http://code.google.com/p/autoquad/
I would also like to invite anyone interested to participate in a public beta test of the system. Sensor calibration, setup and configuration is still a lengthy and sometimes tedious process so I would discourage anyone who thinks they can bolt the board to a frame and start flying as that is not at all what you should expect. I have authorized manufacture and sale by ViaCopter and Flyduino who are taking orders in a few days.
Comments
400 Hz is impressive, but with 40% idle, we can improve that a bit, is that true ?
Is this output driven by an interrupt ? On what source file should I look to understand the structure of this IMU output refresh, please ?
All 17 states are updated at 200Hz by the UKF. Observations are applied at various rates depending on the source of the measurement. However, the IMU outputs angular rate data at 400Hz which is used to drive the attitude controller and motors.
That answers my question, thanks. I will try to build on CoIDE, so.
Another question : what is the maximum refresh rate of the attitude : is it 200 Hz as I read ? How many time is necessary for an UKF update ?
I think they went with the STM32F407 - the 100 pin version. I don't use any of the advanced peripherals yet, so any STM32F4XX will work.
I'd suggest looking through the code for those answers. No special libraries of Crossworks were used.
@Bill: thanks for your answer. Could you please tell us what is the reference of the chip used ? STM32F4....
Can you tell us what specific includes will be hard to bind (exotic perhaps ?) ?? Thanks again
Stephane: I've not tried a build with anything other than Rowley's Crossworks. If I had to guess, I'd say it should not be too difficult to get it working with another IDE for someone with the skills.
Hello Bill,
Great board... Congratulations.
Should we understand we can build with CoIDE easily ?
I moved from Rowley's CTL RTOS to CoOS due to some interrupt latency problems. Once the STM32F4 came out, nobody had a solution for multi-threaded support of the FPU so I ended up writing my own support under CoOS. Since then I've had no reason to re-evaluate what's out there. The RTOS should be a tool, not a feature. If you are aware that it exists, then it's not doing its job very well :)
Haha, yeah I think this can be a big hit and also thinking of AQ7. So 5000 isn't that much, last year I also had to plan to switch over to analog. But then saw that they where EOL.
Now waiting for the MPU9150 and LSM333D to test.
I Like C , too more of C++ but when there are a lot of people that work on same code C++ is good , because any developer can work inside his class and improve it. Or is also possible change an AHRS module simple changing a lib and mantain same method , property and event. In C is not so simple is more complex.
Another questions why you choose CoOs instead of FreeRtos ?
Sorry Bill on what cpu ? The limit is C++ on STM32F4 ? At the moment i port all Arducopter project on It in last revision 2.6.1 and it work fine . There is a lot of work on Inertial correction , and on GPS , but i think that your ukf is your solition on it ? The Road of RTK onboard gps is the same that we're evaluating. Could be also possible to port RTKLib http://www.rtklib.com/ on STM32F4 , now is yet available a revision of it on BeagleBoard.
This is my board http://www.virtualrobotix.com/photo/preview-of-vr-brain-of-a-frame-...
MP32F4 V4.0 ( VBRAIN )
Best
Roberto
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
of 8 Next