I've now had a chance to compare the old 63" Nitroplanes Predator with the new 98" Reaper, which is finally in stock. There's no comparison. Compared to the awesome Reaper model, the Predator is a toy. The new Reaper has a fiberglass and balsa/ply body, solid fittings and landing gear and about twice as much internal room. Very solid model and tremendous finish quality.
Here's another shot (I haven't assembled the Reaper's steerable nose gear yet)
Here's the cockpit view (I haven't put the servos in the Reaper yet, but you can get a sense of the size difference. Also note how much room there in the big canopy):
I haven't flown the Reaper yet, and my only concern is that it's very short-coupled (like all Predator models) and may be pretty twitchy in the pitch axis. But I sure feel more comfortable putting it in the air than I did with the little one, which had a bad habit of tip-stalling. I think the flaps on the Reaper are going to help a lot with solid landings.
I probably won't fly this until Sept, since it needs the servos and motor installed. But it's looking good so far!
Comments
Its in an airframe design thread here. I'm fairly math based so prefer to know all I can about things before I break them :D its in the new version only as the conditional formatting doesnt work in 2003 but i can save it out as that if really wanted but it won't be a pretty or helpful.
'Cuz from Chri's point about the short coupling and the other comments about the possible CG questions, this will be a wild ride, esp for any low hour pilots!
(...looks like it could quickly turn into quite a few tiny pieces spread across a runway!)