After 3 months of research, picking a platform, and building my own HD FPV rig, I decided to write this blog to share my experience. I have been flying FPV for about a year now, and this was the most fun project yet! 

Here is a picture of the finished product:

3689618661?profile=originalThe platform I picked was the Hobby King 'Go Discover' FPV flying wing. There are many other possible platforms, but to accomplish my goal of creating an HD platform, this bird had the space and wing loading that would accommodate the components. I like the flying wing platform because of the simplicity of the servo setup - only two channels needed for flight. This made it possible for me to use a 6 channel radio and receiver. The Go Discover also has the camera gimbals for changing the viewing perspective in flight, and since I picked  flying wing, I had enough channels left to control the gimbals and the ArduPilot flight modes with a 6 channel radio. My previous FPV plane was the Phantom FPV (also from Hobby King), but its camera space is limited and there was not enough room in the main fuselage to fit all the electronics. The Go Discover turned out to be just right for everything to fit, but with nearly no room to spare. The final rig weighed in at 4.5 lbs, using a 4000mAH 4 cell lipo. 

The final cost was around $700, (not including the antenna tracker, and WiFi receiver), but for full HD, this was not too bad in my opinion, since some HD systems cost this much without the plane and other electronics.

Parts List:

Go Discover Kit ($118)

You can save money by using the PNF version, however I chose to build my own and choose the motor/ESC/receiver combination.

For the motor I picked this 700kv Outrunner ($36) It barely fits, so don't go bigger.

Turnigy Plush 60amp ESC ($35)

4000mAH 4 Cell Lipo ($37)

ArduPilot APM2.6 with GPS ($74)

Ethernet Switch Module ($16.50)

You will need the Ethernet Switch if you want telemetry over the same WiFi connection you will use for the video. To accomplish this, you will need a 'Serial-to-Ethernet converter', which can be purchased here:

Serial-to-Ethernet converter for APM Telemetry over TCP/IP ($22)

Power Supply for Raspberry PI ($7) (Optional if you want to power everything from the main battery).

1000 mAH battery to power the PI and ethernet switch ($11) (Optional if main battery used to power everything)

Raspberry PI with Case ($40)

PI Camera ($25)

Rocket M5 WiFi 5GHZ ($89) Note: you will need to also buy an access point (Nano M5 is here)

I am using the Nano M5 as the access point and an antenna tracker that I built. See my post here on how to build the tracker, or buy your own.

5.8 GHz Planar Wheel RHCP Antennas, you need 2 for MIMO connection using the Rocket M5 ($90) Less expensive antennas may work, but I have good results with these.

6 Channel 2.4 GHz receiver ($13) (Your choice of radio/receiver combo, my radio is a Turnigy 9xR)

2 Digital Servos for the wings ($40) I don't like to skimp on these. These are very good servos.

2 Analog Servos for the Gimbals ($10)

3, 1 Ft, ethernet cables ($7) (One for PI, one for Rocket M5, and One for Serial-to-Ethernet for Telemetry)

Power-over-ethernet cable for the rocket M5 ($5).  You can buy these at any electronics outlet or google it.

Misc RF connectors (Right angle SMA, and a short RG59 cable with SMA) ($10).

Total for Plane: $671.  + Ground station access point ($89),  $760.  I am not including the cost of the antenna tracker, but from my blog, you can build one for about $250.  The grand total should be under $1K, not including your ground station, but I assume you already have one.

Now for the fun part - assembly. I will describe my assembly for the Go Discover, but the process will be similar for any platform you choose. You will need to arrange the parts as you can to get everything in, and also achieve the correct CG. It took a bit of 'trial and error' for me to find the correct combination.

Step 1: Install the motor and ESC.

I chose to build from the back forward, installing the motor, ESC, then battery/electronics, then finally the Raspberry PI and camera. 

From other blogs about the Go Discover, the motor mount is very weak, so I chose to 'beef' it up by adding some EPO foam and epoxying a metal mount designed to support the SK3 motor. Here is a photo of my setup with the ESC and motor mounted in the rear:


Notice the area just in front of the motor mount where I added some extra foam to fill the space that exists in the stock model. I used some old EPO foam from a junk model and glued it into place. The ESC fits nicely right behind the battery. The battery is installed using Velcro to hold it in place. 

Unfortunately, the amount of electronics that exist in this space made it difficult to just swap the battery, but I could not find a way around it, so I leave the battery in place and charge it in the plane. Of course this limits the number of flights per day, but for such an advanced toy, it's a trade off.

Step 2: Install the ArduPilot, GPS and Serial-to-Ethernet converter.

In the middle section, there is a trapezoid-shaped area that I decided to use to mount the Ardupilot, GPS and Serial converter. Here is a picture of the installation:


In the trapezoid area, I cut out some cardboard that matches the shape, and placed it over the battery. I then mounted the 3 components on top of the cardboard cutout. The view of this photo is with the tail of the plane on the top. On the right side of the plane is the GPS module (with some duct-tape holding it in place). It's the purple square-shaped PCB. I used Velcro under the unit also, and for all the other components. 

In the center is the Serial-to-Ethernet converter. To connect it to the Ardupilot, you will need to modify the connector that is normally used to connect to the Telemetry port with the 900mhz transceiver that you can buy from 3-d robotics. There are 4 wires: ground, power, rx an tx.  You can find a schematic here.  I will explain later how to make this work with your PC software (download from the internet). The Serial-to-ethernet converter has the pinout silk-screened on the PCB and it's pretty obvious were to connect the wires. Make sure you connect TX to RX and RX to TX from the converter and the Telemetry port on the Ardupilot. 

Allow the pins of the serial converter to hang over the cardboard so you can plug in the connector, and velcro the unit to the cardboard. 

Finally, on the left side, you can mount the ardupilot.  Connect as usual to the GPS port, and radio. Please refer to the Ardupilot website on how to configure an connect your Ardupilot. I will not cover that portion here. 

Step 3: Install the Ethernet Switch,  Rocket M5 and antennas:

There is a bit of work to do here because the Rocket M5 comes in a big (sealed) plastic case. You MUST cut it out of its case, and you WILL void the warranty. Use a dremmel tool and CAREFULLY cut around the edge of the case (not across the top), and remove it from the plastic case.

It is highly suggested that you get the Rocket M5 and Nano M5 talking to each other BEFORE you install the M5 in the model. Follow the instructions on the Ubiquity website on how to do this. It's basically the same as connecting two WiFi terminals. Each unit has a built-in webpage for configuration. Configure your Nano as an "Access Point" and the Rocket as a client.  You should be able to "ping" both units from your PC and connect the Raspberry PI to the network and ping it also. For my Raspberry PI, I set the IP address of the ethernet port to, and the ground station PC address to  You will also need to set the IP address of the Rocket M5 and the Nano M5 when you configure them. 

Here is a photo of the position of the Rocket M5 installed in the plane after removal from the case:


Note: this view is the front of the model pointing to the right. The ethernet switch is mounted just in front of the trapezoid cutout that was used to mount the ArduPilot. It is mounted with the PCB vertical in the fuselage. Notice the Ethernet cables connected to it in the left side of the above photo. Again, I used Velcro to mount the ethernet switch.  Notice the gray cable. This is the POE (Power over Ethernet) cable that you will need to use to power the M5. You can get one of these on EBay or Amazon.

There are TWO RF connectors (left side of plane) on the Rocket M5 because this is a MIMO setup (Multiple Input, Multiple Output), which is the same technology used in LTE phone networks. The two antenna configuration gives this radio higher throughput, more range, and better SNR, all of which makes this setup work very well.

You should mount the antennas apart from each other, and for my setup I decided to place them on either side of the plane just under the wing. Since the Go Discover has a pretty big fuselage, the antennas don't touch the ground and are cleared by a couple of inches, so unless you go nose down on landing, they should be safe.  Notice the RF connector on the top of the photo. This is the 2nd antenna. The first antenna is mounted directly below the first RF connector on the left side of the plane.

Also, not shown in this picture is the 2nd battery (1000 mAH) and the control receiver, that are mounted under the Rocket M5. The power supply for the Raspberry PI is also mounted in this space, just behind the Rocket M5. 

Note: to hold the Rocket M5, I created a couple of EPO foam mounts to make sure it didn't move, and glued them in place under the M5, and then I used Velcro to hold it down. 

Here is a photo of where I installed the antennas:


Notice the two white posts on either side. These are the 5GHz planar wheel antennas. 

Here is another set of photos showing the RF connectors:



Notice also in the above photo, on the left side is the radio receiver (Orange RX DSMX type for my radio). Out of view (under the M5) is the power supply used to power the Raspberry PI. You can mount this anywhere, but this is a convenient spot.  The placement of the radio is also convenient to connect the servo wires to the ArduPilot.

Step 4: Installing the Raspberry PI and Camera

(More to come)

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!

Join diydrones


  • Old post deleted because I was being an idiot and not reading properly.

  • @Dom, you can hook up direct, but if the voltage drops below 10v, you could run into problems. I know from my own testing that the M5 works with 3 or 4 cell lipos. You can go up to 24v. Ubiquity says 12v is the minimum, but that's the advertised spec. I am using a 4s directly connected, it's also the main battery for the ESC. 

  • Aaaaaaaaaah, well that explains how it deals with voltage drop over long cat5 runs then.  So is it safe to hook 3s/4s lipo straight up to a basic passive poe injector cable then?  Or is it better through say a 12v bec?

    Thanks for the reply, wish I'd just asked before spending a frustrating day researching!

  • Power via PoE can be 8-24v. In lower voltage, higher current requires.
    Ex.: 24V x 0.5A, 12V x1A
    The voltage regulator into M5 does work to reduce the voltage required.

  • Sorry, I posted this on part 2 of this blog by accident, should have been here I think instead:

    Hi, I got a bit excited and ordered a ubiquiti poe radio ( without researching the poe bit more - I assumed it would be easy enough.  The board itself is great - it's only 24g and quite small so a perfect fit for a quad.  But I'm struggling to work out how to power it - the spec says 24v.  Does anyone know if it will take less than this, power straight from a LIPO, or else what the lighest (and preferably cheapest) way is to get 24v from a 3s/4s/6s lipo?

    The same distributor also sells these which do the job, but they're pretty heavy and large for a quad:

  • Here's a test of  720x480 (Not hd, but good enough for FatShark HD), the latency is 120ms.  A little better than the 1280x720 pipeline.3701843207?profile=original

  • Patrick, I'm unable to view your video right now. However, I am a bit confused by your statement - when you say "algorithm" are you talking about the H264 codec?

    Latency should be measured as the time between something happening and that image being visible on the screen. One of the easiest ways to test this is by running a stopwatch (with milliseconds) and filming both the stopwatch app and the received video in the same frame.

    Regarding your comments about data, I assume you are referring to inter-frames versus key frames? Either way, the data transmission should be the same as you are specifying a constant bitrate. So long as your link medium can transmit data at least at the rate you are sending, latency should not vary. In my testing I have found this to be true.

    I think your pipeline is probably as optimized as can be, as it appears you are simply parsing and payloading the 264 data (which should be as quick as possible). Using very similar pipelines, I have not been able to get under 100ms. Please do share if you figure it out!
  • Hello Dan,  I am working on that. If you look at the 2nd part of my post, there is a link to a You-Tube video showing a 1280x720 pixel transmission. I will be running tests on various pipelines and posting them tomorrow. There is some ambiguity on what latency really means, because it changes based on the actual content of the video. For quick scene changes, there is more latency, for gradual changes, it's less because of the algorithm not sending as much data, as it is optimized to only send 'changes' to blocks.  So to get a real accurate measurement of latency is a difficult thing.  Kind of like gas mileage in a car. If you stomp on the pedal, it will be worse.

  • Patrick, would you mind measuring your latency? I am quite curious if it is actually under 100ms. I have been testing extensively, and have not been able to get under 100ms even with in-camera H264 encoding. What pipeline are you using?

  • Artem, you have a point about the battery. I have an 8000mAH (20C) battery in my other UAV and it works great. I can fly for 40 mins with it, and the entire rig weighs the same as the Go Discover.  A different outrunner may also be better. I used the 700kv motor because I had it in my box, and thought it would work with a bigger prop.  I am using an 11X8 prop with it, and my first flight lasted 25 mins.

This reply was deleted.