mapping (4)

T-Drones M1200

Hello anybody here.

Today i would like to introduce one type drones M1200. This is an almost perfect drone for industrial filed.

One of the biggest feature is ultra-light. Please refer to the picture as below:

7963463685?profile=RESIZE_710x

T-Drones has been cooperating with T-Motor all the time. We use T-Motor power system, so the quality is surely great.

7963467096?profile=RESIZE_710x

The biggest advantage is long-endurance flight time.

7963470455?profile=RESIZE_710x

No worry about your environment when you use T-Drones M1200

7963473467?profile=RESIZE_710x

It can be applicated in:

7963476891?profile=RESIZE_710x

Are you interested in M1200? If you want to know more types of T-Drones, feel free to contact me.

Email:bella@tmotor.com

Skype:bella@tmotor.com

Wechat:xjj199559

Read more…

Hello DIY’ers!

I stumbled upon this 2015 post from Gerard Toonstra and am looking to build a similar setup:

https://diydrones.com/profiles/blogs/cheap-1-2cm-scale-accuracy-for-your-surveys?id=705844%3ABlogPost%3A1974405&page=1#comments

There’s a ton of useful information in his post/blog, but since several of the links have now aged and technology has advanced, I thought I’d create a new thread on the topic.

I have a Phantom 4 Pro which I have a few years of surveying experience with (I’m not a licensed surveyor) doing aerial mapping and using Pix4D, so that part's covered. What I don’t have is $30k for an RTK unit lol.

I'm looking to build five small GPS "boxes" to place on my GCPs in order to increase the relative accuracy of my maps in all three axes. After a few days of research, I have a better understanding of how to build said boxes, but not enough to pull the trigger on the required components yet. Here’s where I’m at:

 

  • Accuracy:   Relative accuracy is more important than absolute accuracy in my case, at least for now. I’m shooting for sub-20cm accuracy after letting them log for 1-2 hours and processing using PPK. Getting down to sub-10cm without needing a base would be awesome, but I’m not sure that’s realistic.
  • Arduino+Shields vs. Raspberry Pi 4:   I don’t have any experience with either option. I plan on getting familiar with one or the other so I can build these boxes now as well as a mapping UAV in the future. It seems Arduino+Shields is the simpler and cheaper route, but I like how the Raspberry Pi 4 comes with so much capability packed right on the original board. I’d happily pay the extra money for the Pi if it makes sense for this project. If I go with the Pi 4, is 2gb enough memory or should I go with the 4gb version?
  • GPS Module:   Although the ZED-F9P claims to be around 1cm accuracy with RTK, it seems a bit overkill if using it for static logging and PPK. As for cheaper GPS modules I'm looking at the M8N or M8T, unless there's another capable/cost-effective module that I'm unaware of.
  • Usability/IO:   I'd like to be able to have my settings saved for the boxes instead of configuring them before each job/flight (EEPROM?) so that I just flip a switch and they eventually start recording until I turn them off. A few LEDs (or mini LCD screen) to indicate battery charge and satellite fix/data activity.
  • Runtime:   Battery operated, rechargeable. If I had to let them collect for let’s say four hours would one or two 18650s do the trick? AAA’s? I’ll likely be logging at 1Hz.
  • Communication:   Do I need antennas for them if they’re not communicating to one-another?
  • Data Storage:   Stored onboard each of the boxes. I assume via SD cards.
  • Programming:   I have a little coding experience, I’m sure I can learn what’s required.
  • Enclosures:   I’ll model and 3d print them.
  • Random unknowns:   Data Logger (Arduino + Sparkfun Logomatic v2? Do Raspberry Pi’s already come with data logging capabilities?), Software (u-Center looks nifty, not sure if that’s needed for PPK though), Data Processing (RTKLIB? RCTM?).
  • Budget:   A few thousand USD, I realize that generally speaking higher accuracy = more money.
  • Working Location:   NW United States.

I know this is an absolute mountain of questions, many of which are subjective, so any spattering of info would be greatly appreciated! I’ll be sure to share my build-in-progress and performance of the boxes here in case others find it useful. Thanks!

Read more…
100KM

DeltaQuad first mapping VTOL with 61 Megapixel sensor

5334387861?profile=original

Vertical Technologies has successfully integrated the new Sony A7R mark IV on the DeltaQuad Pro #MAP VTOL UAV. This release marks the first VTOL mapping UAV that supports 61 megapixel mapping.

Earlier this year Sony announced the release of their highest resolution camera yet. the Sony Alpha 7R IV offers a full frame 61.0 MP back-illuminated Exmor R™ CMOS image sensor with latest-generation BIONZ X™ image processor

This camera system has now been integrated on the DeltaQuad Pro #MAP VTOL UAV. With this sensor the vehicle can produce imagery down to 0.4cm/px or cover up to 1200 hectares at 3cm/px in a single flight. A full coverage sheet is available here.

Vertical Technologies is a Netherlands based manufacturer of commercial grade VTOL drones for Surveillance, Transport, Mapping and Inspection. For more information please visit www.deltaquad.com.

Read more…

Aerial Mapping Via Misson Planner

5334381488?profile=original

Hey Guys, we just conducted an aerial mapping on Mission Planner using one mapping VTOL, and the mapping camera is SONY A7R camera-based. Also, RTK/PPK system is used during the whole process. We want to share with you the video here and get more suggestions about mapping via the Mission planner.

Video link of the mapping: https://youtu.be/G-W3uIMTwVA

Read more…