Not only are they the safest, quickest method of quickly taking a snapshot of an entire highly dynamic site, they significantly reduce surveying costs. Adding powerful structure from motion (SfM) software and virtual survey tools to the equation means no boots on the ground and no need for interrupting any operations.

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!

Join diydrones

Comments

  • email sent

  • @Jimmy Oliver please contact Oliver  at oliver@unirove.com. He can give you more information.

  • What would be the best software recommendation for Volume Measurement (aggregates) at quarries, etc.? I am looking at Pix4D but it is wildly expensive. 

  • @ Dan

    Thank you very much for your time.

    Please so how (where) does the altitude reference coming from ? Or does PhotoScan use focus values to do altitude?

  • @ Dan Murray

    would you be so kind and briefly explain how it works ?

    Or are you using LiDar and then extrapolating the volumes ?

    Thanks in advance

  • @Waladi, we did not investigate the effect of oblique photography on accuracy. Something still on the to do list.

  • I use GloablMapper as well but for the visualizations and virtual surveying we prefer to use Virtual Surveyor Tool, which is what we used in this video. GlobalMapper is OK for heads-up digitizing, Virtual Surveyor embeds you in a 3D environment in which you can visualize and measure simultaneously.

  • Is all features generated from single software processing such as Photoscan?
    And do you need obligue photos to increase stock pile calculation accuracy?

    Thanks.
    Waladi
This reply was deleted.