A group for DIY Drones moderators to discuss best community management practices.
Moderator Basics
These are the basic instructions for moderators:
Most of what you'll be doing is approving (or not) blog posts and otherwise keeping things running smoothly.
With blog posts, the key things to check before approving are:
- Does the post start with an image/video or at least have one very close to the top?
- Are videos embedded? (Not a link to a video elsewhere)
- Is the post informative, rather than asking a question or a request for help? (Those should be sent to the discussion forum).
Feel free to make modest edits (such as moving a photo to the top, or turning a video link into an embed) yourself. If the post should be in the discussion forum instead, paste the text into a Friend request to the author explaining that and delete the post. (Using a Friend request will hopefully take some of the sting out of having to reject their post ;-) )
When Moderating Comments:
Deletion is really the course of last resort, and tends to cause more trouble than it solves. Instead, we follow this escalation process:
- 1st course of action in case of TOS abuse: Gentle note in the comments asking people to play nice
- 2nd: Edit the comment to remove offending piece and add: "[Moderator: Text edited to comply with site TOS]". It's nice to PM the member with an explanation, warning
- 3rd: Lock comments. Also PM member with explanation/warning
- 4th (only in cases of gross abuse): Delete comment. PM member
- 5th (very rare, and only after multiple warnings): Ban member
Our Culture and Values:
Mark Harrison, one of our star moderators, articulated our culture and policies best with this post, which I'll just quote verbatim:
Here's my general feeling about a lot of things on this site; in fact, it's pretty much my general philosophy for large parts of my life:
"It's more important to enable good things than prevent bad things"
For diydrones, this generally means:
--Be generous in accepting blog posts. We're not at a point where there are more submissions than can be confortably digested in a day. Likewise, the term "drone" is evolving at such a fast rate it's hard to pin down exactly what it means for everyone. So, I'm happy to lump in quadcopters, FPV, gimbals, RC, artistic aerial videos, electronics, radios... all kinds of stuff that meets my nebulous criterion of "generally interesting to the diy drone community."
Now of course it can be protested, "what if we're flooded by dozens or hundreds of posts on marginally related topic X?" And my response would be, "let's wait until that happens; we'll have tons more context and it will be easier to make a specific decision then than make some globally encompassing set of rules now. We may all even be a little bit smarter and a little bit wiser!"
-- Be generous in approving users. Lots of people aren't comfortable with revealing too much information about themselves, or may not have a particularly cogent reason for joining a site. I'm somewhat of an exception to this case... "Are you asking what I'm interested in? Let's talk about me, it's one of the most interesting topics we can discuss, don't you agree?" But for a lot of people, they may interested in the topic, but not interested in telling you why.
-- Feel free to make mistakes, and be nice when other people are making mistakes. Sometimes the most interesting things happen when things go awry. For better or worse, sometimes the most education things as well!
I think this is pretty much in agreement with how the site has been run historically. It's a site for amateurs, by amateurs (keeping in mind the defintion of "amateur"... from the French "lover of"), and as such has had a pretty wide-ranging scope of what's acceptable. That's served the site well, enabling it to be as relevant (or even more!) in 2013 as it was when it was founded.
Of course there are big exceptions to this "don't sweat the bad stuff" philosophy -- brain surgery, rocket launches, and skydiving come to mind -- but I think it's a useful guideline for a site such as ours.
More instructions:
You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!
Comments are closed.
commercial advertisment post
Hi dear moderators, Recently I notice there are some " pure " advertising post from Skywalker / TopXgun ect. Where some of the post being deleted some make it to the blog post. I'm not really sure if this type of " blog " have a place here or we should delete it. As for the Skywalker, I saw their blog being deleted and a few day latter they post again with some minor modification, but still look 100% " advertisement " to me. It seems that they do " NOT " get the message or understand what their…
Read more…Scam???
Is this a scam, guy is posting on every group?http://diydrones.com/xn/detail/705844:Topic:2336557?xg_source=activity
Read more…Commercial Groups on DIYD
I think we need to discussion about 'commercial' groups like this new one i just noticed (especially since as the site is getting bigger)http://diydrones.com/group/outdoor-roboticsA quick visual search through gave me these 'commercial' looking groupshttp://diydrones.com/group/voltahttp://diydrones.com/group/ugcshttp://diydrones.com/group/uavsaShould we not be thinking that groups created by commercial enterprises require some form of sponsorship of the site or development work in the DiyDrone…
Read more…
Comments
@Randy,
+1 on your comment:-)
TCIII
OT but the CAD Drones blog post at least gave me a smile so I'm happy it was approved. I think we all saw the failure of that subscription model coming.
Occasionally I do make a post during working hours on a short break, but I don't usually navigate through waiting blog posts, so if I can't form an opinion based on the comments posted here, then I likely won't post unless it's still up for debate in the evening (if I have any energy left).
Nathaniel ~KD2DEY
ROFL +1 To Hai Tran's comments!! I too don't post comments unless I can make an informed opinion or have a strong opinion one way or the other. For me this past weekend was a working weekend. Also I am not among the retired and thus am working long hours scraping together a living, and hopefully a bit extra to indulge in my UAS projects!
Regards,
Nathaniel ~KD2DEY
No to anything related to CAD drones or videos posts showing irresponsible flying or first flight of my non very special copter.
No one is criticising you for approving a post if you think it is appropriate and no one else voices an opinion in a timely manner.
There needs to be a degree of autonomy. Frankly I sill think JJ's post is stupid but at the same time it wasn't that important either for urgent attention
@Hai,
Then if a waiting blog post gets approved that there had been a previous hold on for consensus and you do not comment prior to approval, even though you have been notified by email that a consensus comment has been posted, you would then have nothing to say after the fact?
TCIII
Speaking for myself there is a bit of selective comments in that I speak up if I have an strong opinion on something, it's an important matter or if I just have some free time. I don't necessarily think that I should make a comment on every single blog that gets mentioned here
@David,
Gary did not put comments in "a waiting blog post". He put the Film Show waiting blog post on hold (Moderators do not approve until consensus has been reached) on Friday and then posted on the Comment Wall for comment ("Now we have a show as a member? Should we really let that happen they are only going to post relentlessly. I say let them have their film show post and thats that.") requests for consensus on Friday.
There have been instances where a Moderator has approved a waiting blog post that I put a hold on (Moderators do not approve until consensus is reached) so they just blindly approved the waiting blog post without bothering to read it?
TCIII
-
47
-
48
-
49
-
50
-
51
of 611 Next