Pixhawk Flyaway

I had a disturbing experience yesterday. I was test flying my Hex and after a few successful hovers, a little PID tuning, and running through a few flight modes, I decided to let it stretch it's wings a little more.

On a fresh charge, I put it into Loiter, took it up a couple hundred feet, did a slow 360 and then slowly moved it forward.

Then, All of a sudden, the Hex sped up, headed toward the river, then banked to the right, spun around and put itself into a field about a quarter mile away.

Fortunately, no-one was hurt, and the Hex itself only suffered a couple broken arms and a prop - but needless to say, I'm quite concerned and want to get to the bottom of this before taking it out again.

I've uploaded the flight video to youtube at http://youtu.be/sc4UqOOiUUQ

I'm also attaching the flight log files.

I don't doubt it's related to something I did (or failed to do) and any insight would be greatly appreciated.

Cheers,

Adam

In case it helps - here the vehicle specs

-----------------------------------------------------

Tarot 680 (Carbon) Hex frame.

Sunnysky V3508 380KV motors

5S 4000mah Zippy Lipo

3DR Pixhawk, 3DR 915Mhz Telemetry & 3DR GPS unit

Futaba 14GS Radio

Mavlink connection to Droidplanner 2 on a Nexus 7

9.BIN

You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!

Join diydrones

Email me when people reply –

Replies

    • My gut instinct would be to consider a 'failsafe' that decides when to ignore the accelerometers altogether. I understand that this could be problematic... how do you detect intense vibration? time averaging? min/max? And you can't just switch back into STAB, because of potential throttle differences. And how would you alert the pilot that they are in full control? Is GPS accurate / fast enough to attempt to bring the copter down by itself?

      And of course, while the developers feel the need to compensate for this risk, there is always the possibility that the simplest solution is better education about any automatic mode's dependence on acceleration and the importance of good vibration dampening.

  • Hello Adam, 

    I'm sorry for your copter,

    had exactly 2 times the same problem, have replaced all ESC. There were priced with inserted cable. Have 6 new soldered. My hexa is still flying healthy :)

    sorry for my bad english Greetings from sunny Germany

    ciao Klaus

    • That's my #1 suspect right now - see my response directly above for more details.

      Awaiting the arrival of 6 new ZTW spiders rated to 6S and 30A

  • In log alt and baro alt very strange, Alt -150! but baro alt +80.

    • 1, Z accel    (Mechanical?)

      2, Alt down to -150

      3, ThrOut   Max

      4, Descend full speed to hold -150 alt

      alt.JPG

      • i think this guy is right. as soon as your copter started moving (easy to tell by LAT because you were in loiter so long beforehand) your accelerometers are going nuts. Desired X & Y accel is +/-5 (centered at 0) and Z between -5 and -15 (centered at -9.8). 

        Your X hung out around -5, but your Y was drifting between -10 and 20, with your Z fluctuating between 0 and 60! (based on IMU) I would definitely say that your pixhawk came detached and was vibrating, leading to erratic behavior.

        public service announcement: always switch to stabilize when in doubt! stabilize doesnt care about acceleration, just orientation.

        Help me out here guys, I'm not familiar with the pixhawk. There is also IMU2 - in the 'high stress' region the readings differ significantly from IMU. is this due to the nature of vibration, or could this be indicative of something else?

        • I agree, it sounds like the flight controller came loose.  Those are not X and Y values that make any sense with it firmly attached.

          • I'll double check the actual connection, but I'm pretty sure the Flight Controller didn't come loose, Even after the crash it remains firmly in place where it was originally mounted (3M VHR tape).

            My #1 suspect right now is the ESC's I originally intended to use 3S & 4S batteries, but after being shipped 380KV motors rather than 580KV, I decided to run 5S rather than return the motors.

            I completely overlooked the fact that my ESC's (Afro Slims) though having plenty of headroom for Amperage, were only rated to 4S.

            I'm wondering if the patterns of failure shown in the logs would be inline with the type of failure that could be expected by driving an ESC over voltage.

            • i would expect a higher voltage to just burn up your esc electronics, not have any effect on the flight controller...

              i don't know what pixhawk internals look like - perhaps a screw is loose, and the flight board is rattling around inside a case? it just seems very improbable that an electrical problem would cause this obvious vibration....

              hmm, actually, you drop very suddenly to 18v as soon as the erratic behavior starts. i dont log my voltage, so i dont know if this kind of drop is normal. could it be caused by some kind of electrical problem, or is it just due to the high throttle requested during the flyaway?

              it does seem strange to drop to 3.6v / cell after only 3 minutes....

              3702866402?profile=original

              • That is a pretty significant drop in voltage. Would motors running at full power through an ESC not designed for it cause that big of a drop?

This reply was deleted.

Activity

DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @DAVGtech: https://t.co/GwkbSBjdGa
10 hours ago
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @DAVGtech: Good morning from @IndyAChallenge at @IMS. It was a late night, but worth it. Come see for yourself how the pass ended and ch…
10 hours ago
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @circuitlaunch: Robot fun this Saturday (23) at Circuit Launch! From 10am to 4pm. Lots of robots, autonomous car racing training, tech t…
yesterday
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @chr1sa: 10 of these autonomous racecars will be competing tomorrow at the Indianapolis raceway
yesterday
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @a1k0n: Sync'd @joshu's GoPro w/ my datalogging; video is 2.5X speed, Google imagery upper-right. Found out my track boundaries are WAY…
Tuesday
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @a1k0n: Also, at 45mph, the front tires literally blow up like a balloon and it doesn't have much front traction, so the car becomes fai…
Tuesday
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @a1k0n: Okay, some datalogs! Green dots are precalculated racing line (from my crummy optimizer -- it veers to the middle after 2 for Re…
Tuesday
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @a1k0n: Welp my @selfracingcars entry, hastily conceived heading filter and all, actually worked! Heading home, datalogs and videos to f…
Tuesday
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Monday
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Oct 15
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @f1tenth: What can we learn from autonomous racing? Actually, a lot! To get an idea what you can do in this field and where the research…
Oct 11
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Oct 11
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @a1k0n: It's aliiiiiive! Less than a week until @selfracingcars and I'm just now digging this bad boy out. Been a crazy few months. Hope…
Oct 10
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @OttawaAVGroup: Mark your calendars. CAV Canada is happening on Dec. 2nd, 10am-4pm EST. And guess what - admission is FREE! Get your ti…
Oct 6
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @f1tenth: Our new 1:10 scale 3D racetrack is here. We will implement it in the @SVLSimulator in the next weeks so everybody can use it.…
Oct 6
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @DAVGtech: Received sweet autonomous Ferrari's that we plan to demo at the @IndyAChallenge on our portable @donkey_car track. Let us kno…
Oct 6
More…