Info from 3DR on the Pixhawk Mini
" Expect to see all details, a quick start guide and faq on our site by Wednesday but here is a rundown:
Main Processor: STM32F427 Rev 3
IO Processor: STM32F103
Sensors
Accel/Gyro/Mag: MPU9250
Accel/Gyro: ICM20608
Barometer: MS5611
Voltage Ratings:
Power module output: 4.1~5.5V
Max input voltage: 45V (10S LiPo)
Max current sensing: 90A
USB Power Input: 4.1`5.5V
Servo Rail Input: 0~10V
Dimensions: 38x43x12mm
Weight: 15.8g
External GPS Module: GNSS receiver: ublox Neo-M8N; compass HMC5983
Weight: 22.4g
Dimensions: 37x37x12mm
Interface:
1 x UART Serial Port
Spektrum DSM/DSM2/DSM-X® Satellite Compatible
Futaba S BUS® Compatible
PPM Sum Signal Input
I2C
CAN
ADC
Internal Micro USB Port"
I think I found my problem, I have been attempting flight with a 4 cell battery like I did with my other FC boards. I tried a 3 cell and it maintained flight, but very unstable like the PID are too high. I will now tone those down and see what happens.
Steve Kurywchak said:
Hi Rob,
How did the 250 fly with a bad IMU using the PixFalcon.? I have used every board from APM to the PixRacer and cannot get the Hobbyking PixFalcon to lift off without eventually flipping back wards. Are you using a power module to power the board? I am using two wires to connect to the PM , 5V and ground. We can't power the servo rail, as I am used to doing with all the other boards, also there is no ground connections to the ESCs'. Any thought you can share?
Thanks,
Steve
Rob_Lefebvre said:
Gary, I've got a Pixfalcon on a 250 racer. The IMU failed after about 10-20 flights. I will be replacing it with an AUAV Pixracer, just haven't gotten around to it yet. I don't use Hobbyking junk anymore. They just have no quality control or engineering standards. They will even foist off junk with known major engineering errors, such as their Pixracer clones. I just don't have time to deal with this crap anymore.
Super excited about this - I've installed 4 Holybro Pixfalcons this year and I'm very happy with their performance, but I look forward to a 3DR version along with the new engineering improvements. I'll be refreshing the page regularly...
Chris Anderson said:
The Pixhawk Mini is a new version with upgraded sensors and CPU. It comes with adapter cables for old-style DF13 connector devices. That's a preview listing. The full listing will be coming this week.
How did the 250 fly with a bad IMU using the PixFalcon.? I have used every board from APM to the PixRacer and cannot get the Hobbyking PixFalcon to lift off without eventually flipping back wards. Are you using a power module to power the board? I am using two wires to connect to the PM , 5V and ground. We can't power the servo rail, as I am used to doing with all the other boards, also there is no ground connections to the ESCs'. Any thought you can share?
Thanks,
Steve
Rob_Lefebvre said:
Gary, I've got a Pixfalcon on a 250 racer. The IMU failed after about 10-20 flights. I will be replacing it with an AUAV Pixracer, just haven't gotten around to it yet. I don't use Hobbyking junk anymore. They just have no quality control or engineering standards. They will even foist off junk with known major engineering errors, such as their Pixracer clones. I just don't have time to deal with this crap anymore.
Apparently we have a lot of really good choices, some OK choices and lots of not so good choices.
What we need is a comprehensive description and capability, performance and reliability comparison of each one.
I do not think our main guys here, Philip, Roberto or Victor have anything to fear from this as you are clearly the lead systems.
But we really need a comprehensive description that lets each person make the most educated decision they can for themselves.
I don't think we are all likely to completely agree on comparative values, but we can come pretty close.
It appears we actually suffer from a plethora (lot) of systems and are currently really not picking the ones that are best for each of us.
Right now I am building a shop and have to put a roof on it soon, but I am still willing to participate in an effort to put this together if you all think it is worthwhile.
I will give it it's own entire section on my DronesAreFun web site and we can put it in a blog here and possibly on the ArduPilot site as well if they will have it.
@Roberto. I own XUAV X2, 3DR Pixhawk, and VR uBrain 5.2 (2 of them) and I must say it is a great board that any serious people should consider.
Roberto Navoni said:
VR Brain 5.2 still available in standard format and micro ,too . And it's official supported by the Ardupilot team .
So there are a lot of option instead to buy PixFalcon .
On VR Brain there are also Pro support for special application with integration in ROS. Some big company choose to use VR Brain Pro for its custom and complex drone.
I see Jordi is doing US made and properly AUAV attributed Pixracer's for $99 and it seems quality Pixhawks for $99. Nice to see another player providing what I can only imagine is quality hardware.
Replies
" Expect to see all details, a quick start guide and faq on our site by Wednesday but here is a rundown:
Main Processor: STM32F427 Rev 3
IO Processor: STM32F103
Sensors
Accel/Gyro/Mag: MPU9250
Accel/Gyro: ICM20608
Barometer: MS5611
Voltage Ratings:
Power module output: 4.1~5.5V
Max input voltage: 45V (10S LiPo)
Max current sensing: 90A
USB Power Input: 4.1`5.5V
Servo Rail Input: 0~10V
Dimensions: 38x43x12mm
Weight: 15.8g
External GPS Module: GNSS receiver: ublox Neo-M8N; compass HMC5983
Weight: 22.4g
Dimensions: 37x37x12mm
Interface:
1 x UART Serial Port
Spektrum DSM/DSM2/DSM-X® Satellite Compatible
Futaba S BUS® Compatible
PPM Sum Signal Input
I2C
CAN
ADC
Internal Micro USB Port"
I think I found my problem, I have been attempting flight with a 4 cell battery like I did with my other FC boards. I tried a 3 cell and it maintained flight, but very unstable like the PID are too high. I will now tone those down and see what happens.
Steve Kurywchak said:
Super excited about this - I've installed 4 Holybro Pixfalcons this year and I'm very happy with their performance, but I look forward to a 3DR version along with the new engineering improvements. I'll be refreshing the page regularly...
Chris Anderson said:
Hi Rob,
How did the 250 fly with a bad IMU using the PixFalcon.? I have used every board from APM to the PixRacer and cannot get the Hobbyking PixFalcon to lift off without eventually flipping back wards. Are you using a power module to power the board? I am using two wires to connect to the PM , 5V and ground. We can't power the servo rail, as I am used to doing with all the other boards, also there is no ground connections to the ESCs'. Any thought you can share?
Thanks,
Steve
Rob_Lefebvre said:
yes. i don't want to be sarcastic on this, but looks like the wheel is turning backwards..
Philip said:
You Guys give me an idea.
Apparently we have a lot of really good choices, some OK choices and lots of not so good choices.
What we need is a comprehensive description and capability, performance and reliability comparison of each one.
I do not think our main guys here, Philip, Roberto or Victor have anything to fear from this as you are clearly the lead systems.
But we really need a comprehensive description that lets each person make the most educated decision they can for themselves.
I don't think we are all likely to completely agree on comparative values, but we can come pretty close.
It appears we actually suffer from a plethora (lot) of systems and are currently really not picking the ones that are best for each of us.
Right now I am building a shop and have to put a roof on it soon, but I am still willing to participate in an effort to put this together if you all think it is worthwhile.
I will give it it's own entire section on my DronesAreFun web site and we can put it in a blog here and possibly on the ArduPilot site as well if they will have it.
@ Philip, thank you for the response.
Best Regards,
Gary
@Roberto. I own XUAV X2, 3DR Pixhawk, and VR uBrain 5.2 (2 of them) and I must say it is a great board that any serious people should consider.
Roberto Navoni said:
Yes Jordi's Solo GPS is plug and play!
I see Jordi is doing US made and properly AUAV attributed Pixracer's for $99 and it seems quality Pixhawks for $99. Nice to see another player providing what I can only imagine is quality hardware.
Hi Rob,
Is that GPS simply plug and play compatible with the Solo?
And do you need a specific adapter?
Are you using it on your Solo?
Also not to forget other big Dronekit player Intel with it's own Edison based flight controller.
Best,
Gary