Annoying yaw movements Iris+ - how to tune them away

I am using my Iris+ for about half a year now. Without any major issues. All is running smooth.

There is just one annoying issue that with a 2-axis gimbal (Tarot) I always need post video stabilization as there are strongly visible yaw movements.

I have seen other raw videos on youtube and it seems that some persons get much better yaw stability.

I tried tuning the PIDs with minor success. Basically I am able to tune down the amplitude of the yaw movements, change their frequency, but so far have not gotten them to a level which I found appropriate.

Anyone having good experiences with that?For me it's hard to accept that I would need a 3 axis gimbal. I still hope it can be fixed by a good tuning.

Currently my PIDs for yaw are like that:

rate P  0.7

rate D 0.008

rate i 0.03

stab P 10.0

Anyone having better values? Anyone having a good idea on the tuning strategy? Less stab P and tryin to solve it via the rate values?

You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!

Join diydrones

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Well, here's a demo of what I came up with using the Tarot 2D. No post-processing. The nadir shots are the most telling, even tiny twitches will show up very obviously.

    • You were flying that all in manual, so no auto, loiter, position hold?

    • Yes, all in STB.

    • And here's the same pilot, same craft, with a flat expo curve.

    • Can you share your PID settings for YAW?

      Thanks.

    • Stab Yaw P: 5.00

      Rate Yaw

      P: 0.400

      I: 0.040

      D: 0.004

      IMAX 100

  • Hi Erik, I see it like this:

    Along the X and Y axis the quad needs to tilt in order to manoeuver around. Those system immanent and necessary movements you don't want to see on your camera, so you need at least to stabilize those two axis.

    Yaw movements are intentionally. The quad itself with its control loop acts as a stabilizer. So theoretically there is no need to add stabilization around the Z axis, if the quad would stabilize it perfectly.

    • Maybe in perfect conditions with no wind. But in real world conditions, if you want buttery smooth video your gonna have to bite the bullet and step up to a 3-axis.
  • "For me it's hard to accept that I would need a 3 axis gimbal."

    I'm curious why? The quad maneuvers on 3-axis so if you want stable, smooth video, you'll need a 3-axis gimbal.

    You might be able to soften things up with PIDs, but it's impossible to remove completely.
  • This the fieyu tech G3. Works great.

    image.jpeg

    https://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/3702113987?profile=original
This reply was deleted.