Looking through the forum here, but also over at ardupilot.com and the Facebook group, one can see many folks who have either complained of poor flight performance of their IRIS or had crashes due to power loss towards the end of a flight.

Taking the data from IRIS and running it through eCalc.ch, one can very quickly see that IRIS is too heavy and underpowered to fly safely at the weight of IRIS + Gimbal + Tall Legs.

Therefore my recommendation: Don't fly your IRIS with Gimbal and long legs! It's not safe and you run a very high risk of crashing it! 
Flying with the short legs and GoPro but without Gimbal is OK. Although that's not what I purchased it for.

Have a look at the table below. The "Hover Throttle (Normal)" is the amount of throttle you need to give at the beginning of the flight to keep IRIS hovering. The "Hover Throttle (Low)" is the amount of throttle you need to give when the battery is down to 25% capacity. That's about when you should land. What unfortunately becomes very clear: IRIS is not suitable to be flown with that weight at any realistic air temperature or altitude. Required hover throttle is always more than 70% (making it a "very underpowered copter"; http://copter.ardupilot.com/wiki/ac_throttlemid/). But in all cases you even go beyond 80% required throttle at the end of the flight. You can't control a quadcopter anymore at that level.

3691134891?profile=original

If you want to reproduce these results yourself with http://www.ecalc.ch/xcoptercalc.php, here are the values used:

# of Rotors: 4
Model Weight: 1750g (incl. Drive)
Elevation: see table above
Air Temperature: see table above
Battery Cell: Custom
Configuration: 3S1P
Cell Capacity: 3500 mAh
Resistance: 0.0052 Ohm
Voltage: 3.7V
C-Rate: 30C cont, 40C max
Controller: max 20A
Motor Manufacturer: RCTimer A2830-12 (850)
Propeller: APC SlowFly SF
Diameter: 10
Pitch: 4.7
#Blades: 2

Or use this link.

What hover throttle do you require at what air temperature and field elevation? Post some logs along with air temperature of that day and field elevation.

Chris

You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!

Join diydrones

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • These numbers are very surprising - 72% at best? Is the weight accurate (1750gr)? I just don't think Iris was meant to carry a  gimbal at all. 
    When we were tuning the Easy Drone we had to go up to 36mm motors (400W), 30A ESCs, 11" props and a 4S battery to get to 50% throttle with full weight. (http://kck.st/1gekW1T) To start at 72% is a bit dangerous I agree. 

    3701779153?profile=original

    • Is the weight accurate (1750gr)? I just don't think Iris was meant to carry a  gimbal at all.

      I do. The weight of the IRIS , at least mine, is naked including stock battery, 1290g, + Tarot Gimbal + GoPro 1590g including long printed legs (13.5g/each instead of 5.5g), which is not light, but 400g/axis is nothing unusual in the scene for a quad with 500mm dia...no sports flyer though.

      tkras45h.jpgFlew it with a pure China GIMBAL as well, adding 40g

      gbactopo.jpg

      But the stock battery is more than disappointing: After just 15 cycles about 2400mAh capacity left ( Yes, Im running bats down till 3.3V/cell.)  Except one TGY Nano, I never had such a bad battery before. I usually buy the cheapest HK stuff. I did not use mine, since I used the 5000mAh/20C Zippys adding another 130g. 

      I have to admit, never checked throttle at hover. Although I agree with allmost all of Christians standpoints, I never worried about this.

      Except about the 3DR stock battery , I own. I don´t use it with the Gimbal IRIS anymore. Hopefully a one out of 10000...but shipping it back to 3DR doesn´t pay off.


      Memory source: http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2046042&highlig...

    • Gervais, 

      how did you manage to squeeze down the weight to 1590g? Using the stock 3DR battery the weight should be 1692g and with a higher capacity lipo about the 1750g that I used.

      Also have a look here on some more details: http://cloud-surfer.net/2014/07/10/3dr-iris-with-gimbal-and-tall-le...

      I've been very successful flying IRIS with 4S batteries and 9x4.7 propellers. See here: http://cloud-surfer.net/2014/07/14/3dr-iris-with-4s-batteries/  

    • Somehow my reply got lost: Christian, I had 1030g w/o battery, 1290g with stock battery and short legs,1590g including the dingprint legs instead of the short ones including Tarot and GoPro +130g with 3S/5000mAh Zippy with short leads.

      Btw. I don´t doubt that 4S is the better choice as you described within your helpful blog, which inspired me (besides this thread)... to ask for the weight of an possible "upgrade option"

      http://ardupilot.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=74&t=8824

      No official answer so far.

      Cheers

    • I think the weight is fairly accurate SANS FPV-VTX, SBEC and wiring for same or alternative battery systems for same.

      And my IRIS and other craft are pushing beyond that with these additions and are being stripped of same as its just NOT feasible with the weight of the stock legs and the gimbal +gopro wireing harness ad nauseam,

      xcoptercalc is somewhat close to the truth about the power levels to hover and sustain flight just not enough power to be safe under manual or APM control.

      When a craft is sold as RTF with gopro gimbals and legs to accomplish a specific task it should at least be able to do the task to minimum SAFE levels 50% hover etc if we are EVER to get this industry accepted by the FAA red tape specialists.

      Rules are indeed advancing soon and its best the industry get used to making true not "stretched" claims about  safety and flight time.

      IRIS as presently engineered appears to have been designed to answer some of the issues about beginners and their mistakes:

      body shell

      built up motor pockets

      stronger thicker arms than a DJI 450

      heavy duty landing gear to protect the gimbal and cam

      Unfortunately it looks like weight was a somewhat forgotten concept after the original design or the additions were NOT considered in toto and then the customer base started demanding things like gimbals for the gopro and fpv systems.

      While the craft has a safe hover unloaded its SO close to the weight margin its easily overloaded and the above beginner durability features become HARD limitations to flight duration and throttle at hover.

               hzl

  • The weight of an Iris long leg is approximately 35.2 grams (including mounting screw and nut).

    35.2gr less Dronehoners leg at 21gr is 14.2gr weight saving per leg.

    Changing four legs  gives a net weight reduction of approximately 56.8 grams per airframe.

    A possible bonus (perhaps): drag reduction.

    • The Dronehoners legs are a good start. But not enough. Even leaving away the legs altogether (weight reduction of 140g) you still need 78% throttle to hover at 20C/0m alt towards the end of the flight. Flying at 20C/1000m (that's not even Denver) you already need 88%.

      While reducing weight is the right approach, the legs alone aren't gonna cut it.  

    • what is needed here is a pregnant iris.. arms extended to take at least a 12"(13" preferred) prop, unconstrained motor pockets and at least a 30amp per channel 4-1 ESC and of course a lower KV motor to match the 13"(preferred) props and after all that why bother with the IRIS??

      Plenty of choices for the price of a new IRIS in CF/GF nowadays ..parted out...and some interesting alternatives such as OpenPilot and paparazzi to mention 2 but not all the alternatives.

                         

              hzl

      xcoptercalc is a merciless bitch and I suspect the truth lies someplace within the numbers generated,

      be interesting to see what it says about the phantom vision+ if I can find numbers for same

  • Underpowered or Overweight? 

    My quad has long legs & gimbal, fpv, telemetry. But uses 3000mah 3s. I get about 12 mins flight time before the quad starts to slow descend. Admittedly, my quad is just a cheapo, and not an Iris, but it's similar. I suggest shaving weight - smaller lipo, fewer wires, less plastic body. There's a will there's a way! here's my self built quad for an idea: http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2104315&page=6 

  • Hi All,

    I also had similar results and had previously asked for a xcoptercalc mode from 3DR..(not forthcoming) the numbers dont lie..4S just makes things worse 3 min flighttimes...

    thinking its time to talk to 3DR about a RMA..

    as this is NOT workable and never was doesnt matter WHAT sized battery or voltage is stuffed in..
    until the arms are longer(13"prop) .. the motor pockets ditched(stronger motor) and the battery compartment left behind/ external strapon lipos things WONT improve..

    NO amount of modding will do anything about those numbers till these basic facts are changed.

       

          HZL

This reply was deleted.