APM 2.0 is the culmination of almost a year of hard work. We wanted to make it perfect and we finally have it, we are pushing the limits of AVR and Arduino. I’m sure you will love it, and it’s designed to cover all the DIY community expectations (including those that are not so DIY and are only interested for something that doesn’t require soldering skills).
Check the product listing for availability status!
Main Features
- Three processors--a triple-core autopilot!
- All new state-of-the-art sensors; the first autopilot to use the Invensense 6DoF MPU-6000
- Smaller, lighter, cheaper than APM 1.0--just $199 ready to fly, with GPS, magnetometer and dataflash included.
- Like APM 1.0, this is the world's only Universal Autopilot. The same hardware can autonomously control planes, multicopters, regular helicopters, rovers, even boats, with just a one-click firmware change--no programming required! Best-of-breed mission planning and two-way telemetry, and soon with advanced scripting with Python for robot acrobatics and more.
- Twice as much dataflash memory, with SD card slot
- No soldering required
- When using the internal sensor fusion processor of the MPU-6000, more than half of the Atmega2560 processing capacity is free for new advanced features.
- Native USB, with all new PPM encoder software
New sensors
The big advance in APM 2.0 is the introduction of the Invensense MPU-6000 sensors, which have an internal Digital Motion Processor (DMP) that does advanced sensor fusion. We’ve tested it for months, including lots of flying, and it significantly outperforms the DCM used in APM 1.0. It’s your choice whether you want to use the MPU-6000 internal sensor fusion or do it yourself in the main processor, but if you choose the DMP it frees up nearly 40% of the processing power in the Atmega 2560. This is a digital chip, so we were able to eliminate the ADC chip used in APM 1.0, lowering chip count along with cost and size.
We’ve also upgraded the barometric pressure sensor to the MEAS MS5011, which has a resolution of 10cm! This is at least twice as accurate as the pressure sensor on APM 1.0 and should give ArduCopter best-of-class altitude hold capability. Here are some of our side by side tests conducted by Jose Julio (Spain):
We joke about the color of APM 2.0, we say that is the fusion of ArduPilotMega V1.x (Red board) and the Oilpan/Sensor Shield (Blue board) and resulted to be a purple board. Well this might not be the real reason of the purple color, in fact the APM 2.0 fuses the APM 1.0 and the Oilpan/Sensor board into one, in order to save space and make it cheaper.
Micro daughterboard
But why does it have a small daughterboard with an SD slot, GPS and the magnetometer on top? Aha! The big dilemma I had for months! I was very concerned about leaving the GPS and the Compass stacked on the main board. What will happen to the compass if the board is placed near to big electromagnetic fields like a brushless motor? What will happen if the board is inside a carbon fiber frame and GPS reception is blocked? But what happen if none of those issues matters to you and you want a small board with everything on it? What can I do to solve the necessities of everybody?
So I developed a small shield that can be mounted inside the boundaries of the pins and has special connectors to keep a very low profile of the system, so if you want a small board then you have it! But this shield is optional, so you can still attach your old GPS by using the standard APM V1.0 GPS connector or the classic compass port. But because I promised no soldering I have created a special I2C port (similar to the GPS) that allows you to attach an official APM 2.0 Compass board by just plugging it (yeah just plug and play). The SD slot is there because I had no other place with easy access (underneath the main board was messy and you will be obligated to dismount and flip the entire board to remove the card, you don’t want that right?). In the other hand the daughter board will come in four flavors: GPS+MAG+SD, GPS+SD, MAG+SD and SD. For example if you want to attach only the magnetometer (Compass) externally you just buy the option GPS+SD.
SD card dataflash
The SD slot can read regular SD cards. But for the moment we don’t use them in ArduPlane or Arducopter code because writing regular FAT tables is very slow and can screw up the main loop refresh rate (We’re not using a RTOS yet, and won’t until we migrate to ARM in Q1 next year). There’s why I have created a custom SD card with dataflash on it (twice the capacity of the one in APM 1.0), plus it has the advantage of being removable so you can have multiple logs or you can easily replace it when you exceed the life of the chip. But in case you are planning to use APM 2.0 in something that doesn’t require a 200Hz loops (like a very powerful data logger or weather station) you can interface with a regular SD cards and write text files on them. The possibilities are endless!
The board itself is our first four-layer design and is smaller than APM 1.0 (believe it or not it’s just 2.6 x 1.6 inches, even smaller than the UDB) and this includes four mounting holes and rounded edges to give a nicer look and feel! Of course it’s lead free and ROHS complaint.
New PPM encoder and USB interface
Along with the Atmega2560, there is an Atmega32-U2 that works as the USB (FTDI) serial programmer (Arduino Compatible) and PPM Encoder. This setup allowed us to save even more space and reduce prices by eliminating the FTDI chip in the APM 1.0 board. Best of all, you can update the Atmega32-U2 firmware without buying a SPI programmer; you can easily update via USB!
The Atmega32-U2 also features something called “Serial0 Auto Switch”. This function automatically toggles the serial port 0 from the Atmega2560 from the USB Serial programmer and the modem/OSD port. When you are about to upload a new code through the mission planner or Arduino the Atmega32-U2 will auto-route the Serial0 to the USB Com port and load the code, when is done it will automatically switch it back to the Modem or OSD port. This maximize the usage of this serial port that before was wasted the average of the time (not used while flying). On the APM 1.0 the modem won’t work when is programming and you don’t program anything while you are flying so theirs is virtually no downsides in normal operations. Anyway in case you want a dedicated UART for each you can still switch back to the old APM 1.0 configuration with some solder jumpers.
More I/O
APM 2.0 is also packed with 12 analog pins that can be used as digital I/O pins and three of them can be “solder jumpered” to add extra PWM output channels (for gimbal operations). Each analog/digital pins can be used to read or control special devices like current, RPM, voltage and ultrasonic sensors and output devices like cameras and relay’s. The mission planner will allow you to define in which pins you have connected a device and a drop box will give you the options to select pre-defined sensors or declare a new one (Something similar to Remzibi OSD). This sensors or output devices can be later used in missions and do actions when certain conditions are met (Not implemented yet).
APM 2.0 features 8 PWM outputs (and can be increased to 11 if you give up 3 of your 12 analogs) and 8 PWM inputs. You can also bypass one of the pins with a solder jumper to insert your own PPM signal, still you can use the other PWM inputs left to control something else (so you can have more than 8 inputs).
The +5V servo power is optionally separated from the rest of the board, you can join both powers by insert a regular jumpers. This saves us a lot of problem in some setups. It also features a protection diode to protect the board from reverse polarities. Reset pins are left exposed with ground, so you can add an external reset switch if you wish.
Thanks to the incredible work of the DIY Drones Dev Team, the ArduPlane and ArduCopter code will support the APM 2.0 board when it ships. Special thanks to Pat Hickey, an embedded programmer rock-star, who led the team who ported the code to the new board. Others who worked tirelessly on this include Jose Julio, Andrew Tridgell, Doug Weibel., Randy MacKay, Jason Short, John Arne Birkeland, Olivier Adler, Sandro Benigno, Max Levine the 3DRobotics team and scores of others. It was a huge job!
Special thanks to Chris Anderson for making this possible.
The new code is already in the repository and supports both APM 1.0 and APM 2.0. The Mission Planner will autodetect your board and load the appropriate code (Note: the official 3D Robotics APM 2.0 board has a unique signature and the MP will look for that. Other people can make their own APM 2.0 boards, but the official MP will probably not support them). But if you want to do it manually in Arduino just change this line in Config.h from APM1 to APM2: # define CONFIG_APM_HARDWARE APM_HARDWARE_APM1
APM 1.0 (back) vs APM 2.0 (front)
Price
As you can see the board is more than great! But when you discover the prices you will be double amazed:
APM 2.0 + Daughter board (with all sensors) + 1 x dataflash Card for datalogging + USB micro cable + All pre-soldered and tested for just $399… But we have a special DIYDrones promotion; if you buy it within the next 100 years you only will pay $199.95 (yeah you read it right $199 US Dollars). =P
Seriously. $199 for everything, for everyone, always.
Important note: The board is already available and tested, but with this incredible price you can expect a very high demand (even before formal announcement) so the only way you will be able to get one board soon is by pre-order at the link below. The expected waiting time is from 1 to 6 weeks. First come, first served. We expect to end this delay by February when the shortage of some sensors is over. (We’re going to limit the first batches of board to users; unfortunately we can’t allow distributor sales until customer pre-orders are filled)
Comments
That's what I thought as well Chris, so why I asked. But perhaps I made a mistake, so I've been looking back to find exactly what was said again. Next time I copy and paste to ensure accuracy. My bad if I added to any confusion. Thanks though for the clarification and assurance.
Again My appreciation in clarifying the ArduStation compat. I've been soaking in a lot of information this last couple of weeks in more detail than in the past because I've been on an ordering binge. It was something in the project page regarding compatibility between V1 original and later versions that raised this question. This time though it was the wording in the dev. notes, that left me wondering, so I thought I'd double check because I had ordered one last week on the chance it was just my interpretation and because I had another use for it anyway. But I feel much better now. LOL. Thanks.
@Terry Patton,
You can split your order and ship in two parts. For that you have to contact sales@3drobotics.com. They will take care of you.. Thanks for your interest on the project!
Terry, I'm not sure what comment you're referring to or what "hacking room" means, but to clarify: APM 2.0 has more memory for user code than APM 1.0, due to the ability to offload the sensor fusion work to the MPU6000. APM 2.0 also frees up an extra serial port/UUART specifically for adding secondary boards if desired. It's designed to be more hackable, not less.
ArduStation supports MAVLink, which is unchanged between APM 1.0 and APM 2.0, so no issues there.
First up I'm new here. Although I have lurked on occasion for some time, most of my time was spent on my 8x-motor quad that uses the Vic20 frame and the Quadrino Flight controller, for FPV.
Now I'm ready to begin the move over here to diydrones for my UAV quad conversion and a new fixed wing platform projects, (with a third weird project that is dependant on how these turn out). So please excuse the huge but random holes in my knowledge base, that may appear stupid as I transition from the Quadrino FPV world.
I was very excited when suddenly I see this new apm 2 appear, but I had to read fast what this thing meant and very often confused but I was under pressure if I hoped to get in on the first batch. So I ordered on good faith everything on it was at least as capable and/or expanded as ver1.
Then I notice Jordi Muñoz said it has less hacking room than V1. Then I obviously missed this important aspect when reading about apm2. I think I hit one of the holes I mentioned. I guess then it's a question for Jordi. What exactly did your comment mean? What restrictions will I encounter? what is smaller? Is it worth while that I get a V1. if I want a less dedicated and a more expansive platform to hack around with? Are there other changes that make hacking it more problematic?
Another question or two, for the leaders here. Where will the ArduStation fit into this apm2 path, if at all? Is that being fazed out, or diverging from the path beyond the older V1? I guess I'm asking if it is still worthwhile or will I be on my own if i want to use it with V2.
Last for now. Is it possible to split my order now that I find I may end up waiting until Feb or 8+ weeks for the apm2. I wasn't expecting it to stretch out that far when I was making up my order on Dec 2. Only after, did I read the new post about the extending issue. I don't yet know, where I am on the pre-order list, but I also don't want to lose my place in line if that split is done. But especially if I'm on the earlier delivery date.
I hope though, that I made the cutoff to get an early one. Just like a lot of others around here, that are waiting with some excitement for this new product. :)
David: You are correct, the 3DR plate was designed with APM2.0 in mind. It supports both + and x modes. Also all Easy Star and Bixler Chassis shipped have a hole pattern for the APM2.0. It was a little easter egg no one found.
place my pre-order a few days ago… i assume it can be mounted to the 3DR frame plates without any additional drilling required?
np mate.. i wasnt expecting a guarantee, i just expressed my admiration on the ppl developing it and the dedication and devotion of the whole community. I feel them in high spirits but, as an agnostic, I´m anxious to be able to understand their results.
thanx ever so much for the link.. i meant the arducopter apm and sorry to have posted it here!!
The software is a community effort, not connected with 3DR so everything has to come together to be able to obtain performance of that level. If it can be done, it will be a game changer for sure.
@txus_s_ds: I don't think anybody's going to make a hard guarantee about the performance. Although I'm sure your confidence is inspiring to Chris!
For osx 10.4 try downloading one of the older versions of the arduino environment here: http://arduino.cc/en/Main/Software
to chris:
the plan...? Havent u tested it.. is there any doubt you will crack a 80% dji... stability??
im sure with all the input and worked spended, u ppl will get extremely close... or at least i hope.
Are they gonna be shipped somewhere into spain.. jordi peerhaps?
are u gonna show us videos of the tests and its performance b4?
and on an unrelated note: im gutted i couldnt make ardupilot work on a mac osx 10.4... anyone?