You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!

Join diydrones

Comments

  • Looks that way Mark,  this was probably the platform:

    http://vimeo.com/14125627

     

  • Moderator
    Well I should think that the lack of a rush to recreate this in the UK is because our journos will realise with a tiny bit of research that unless they were licenced it would be illegal and the regulations are in place to prosecute.

    If you were to get the right bits of paper from the CAA or CASA it would be an interesting service to sell, and perfectly legal.

    Should you happen to be in the USA though its actually a couple of years out. It must be very annoying for all the people waiting in the wings to start. The FAA certainly don't seem to have any teeth though.
  • Moderator
    Nick look at my post on the previous page, and then see how rubbish it does look when CNN tries the same trick

    http://www.suasnews.com/2011/05/5400/cnn-playing-me-too-at-tuscaloosa/
  • It was 

     

  • Moderator

    The watermark say "perspectiveAerials".  Perhaps it was done by these people?

    http://www.perspectiveaerials.com/

  • Moderator

    Yes, here we have a Bonanza that circles and directs the bombers.

    They have a FLIR onboard to see through the smoke.

     

  • Moderator

    3692207095?profile=original

    https://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/3692207393?profile=original
  • Moderator

    A recent massive fire at a forestry mill near our town had me imagining how useful my EZStar and cam would be... until a pair of massive CL-215 water bombers overflew us at 200 feet!

    That got me wondering about airspace over an event like that.

  • Moderator
    Perhaps the FAA should be watching - given the possibility of congestion over a natuaral disaster site of news helicopters, FEMA / RedCross overflights, local politicians, etc.
  • Moderator

    Rupert Murdoch = FOX network = BIG boys (as you say)

     

    This was not just some hobbiest giving his footage to the local news crew.

     

This reply was deleted.