Developer

Copter-3.3 beta testing

Warning #1: an issue has been found with Tower's Pause button which can cause the vehicle to fly to an old position if the vehicle has not sent a position update to Tower in some time.

Warning #2: Copter-3.3.2 fixes a bug found in Copter-3.3.1's desired climb rate initialisation which could lead to a sudden momentary drop when switching from Stabilize or Acro to AltHold, Loiter or PosHold.

Warning #3: Copter-3.3.2 fixes an issue found in Copter-3.3.1 which could lead to hard landings in RTL or AUTO if the WPNAV_SPEED_DN was set too high (i.e. >400 or 4m/s) and/or the WPNAV_ACCEL_Z was set too low (i.e. <100 or 1m/s/s).

Warning #4: a bug was found in Copter-3.3 which could cause a sudden crash if you abort a Take-off initiated from a ground station.  Video description is here.  The bug is fixed in Copter-3.3.1 so we recommend upgrading.

Note #1: AC3.3-rc8 corrected a long standing bug in the HDOP reporting.  HDOP values will appear about 40% lower than previously but this does not actually mean the GPS position is better than before.
Note #2: if upgrading from AC3.2.1 the vehicle's accelerometer calibration needs to be done again.
Note #3: set SERIAL2_PROTOCOL to "3" and reboot the board to enable FrSky telemetry like in previous versions.
Note #4: the wiki will be updated over the next few weeks to explain how to use the new features

Copter-3.3.1 is available through the mission planner.  The full list of changes vs AC3.2.1 can be see in the ReleaseNotes and below are the most recent changes since AC3.3.

Sadly this version (and all future versions) will not run on the APM2.x boards due to CPU speed, flash and RAM restrictions.

Changes from 3.3:

1) Bug fix to prevent potential crash if Follow-Me is used after an aborted takeoff

2) compiler upgraded to 4.9.3 (runs slightly faster than 4.7.2 which was used previously)

Changes from 3.3-rc11:

1) EKF recovers from pre-arm "Compass variance" failure if compasses are consistent

Changes from 3.3-rc10:

1) PreArm "Need 3D Fix" message replaced with detailed reason from EKF

Changes from 3.3-rc9
1) EKF improvements:
    a) simpler optical flow takeoff check
2) Bug Fixes/Minor enhancements:
    a) fix INS3_USE parameter eeprom location
    b) fix SToRM32 serial protocol driver to work with recent versions
    c) increase motor pwm->thrust conversion (aka MOT_THST_EXPO) to 0.65 (was 0.50)
    d) Firmware version sent to GCS in AUTOPILOT_VERSION message
3) Safety:
    a) pre-arm check of compass variance if arming in Loiter, PosHold, Guided
    b) always check GPS before arming in Loiter (previously could be disabled if ARMING_CHECK=0)
    c) sanity check locations received from GCS for follow-me, do-set-home, do-set-ROI
    d) fix optical flow failsafe (was not always triggering LAND when optical flow failed)
    e) failsafe RTL vs LAND decision based on hardcoded 5m from home check (previously used WPNAV_RADIUS parameter)

Thanks for your testing!

You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!

Join diydrones

Email me when people reply –

Replies

                  • Has this got something to do with the vortex of high pressure created by the props as they near the ground? I read something about this elsewhere.

              • Does it work similarly in PosHold mode? Link to my similar problem:

                http://diydrones.com/forum/topics/copter-3-3-beta-testing?commentId...

                • I assume so. I have been ever so confused by this in the past because it has been difficult to tell when it thinks it has landed. I think it beeps now, which makes life easier.

                  • I have this issue with 3.2.1 in PosHold.

                    I find having the MOT_SPIN_ARMED set to 130 helps as you can see and hear the props slow down to idle speed when it's decided it's landed. If they're still spinning fast then disarm is treated as a yaw command, if they've slowed down it's treated as a disarm command.

      • Leonard, thanks for the quick response. I wish I could read the logs with such understanding. Do you have tools (other than mission planner) for reading the logs? Top man! I will hook the esc/motor to a servo tester and try to see what response I get. Is it possible that it could be natively (without flight controller input) not running at a speed consistent with the other 5 motors for same pwm input? I did calibrate these escs, but possible the motor is not responding in the same way as the others. Or when you say it had a 'full loss' should I expect to see this motor stall during a run through the pwm range at some value?  

        • Hi Paul,

          " I wish I could read the logs with such understanding. Do you have tools (other than mission planner) for reading the logs? Top man!"

          This goes for me too. (perhaps because I'm also called Paul ;-)

          Reading the logs is also a bit AbraCaDabra for me, but I'm learning........

          BTW. Randy (or another dev) is doing a very good job on this. Thank you devs.

          • Download Kev's Log Analyzer Here

        • Developer

          Hi Paul.

          I am just looking at the Rate line outputs and motor outputs. I have a good understanding the pid loops so that makes it easy for me to see what is going on.

          The way to test the motor is to put your throttle on a switch and go from 10% to full throttle, on and off. If you see the motor loose sync or scream and continue to scream, you know you have a problem.

          You may have the esc speed set differently or have settings different if you are using something like BL heli.

          Good luck!!

          • Leonard,

            I have been testing the front left motor, with the same ESC connected as in the crash (motor 3 (CW rotation))as you suggested, and have not found any issues with it at all so far. Also, the prop on that motor is in great shape and was securely fitted still after the crash. I have compared the output with the motor 2 (left most motor in the hexa X formation) and see almost identical responses on both motors. Is there any other possible cause of the detected outputs you see in my log? Also, could you please advise what the best log bitmask should be for beta testing?

            Thanks, Paul

            • Developer

              Hi Paul,

              The log bit-mask I would suggest is 157694 or 157693 if you don't mind a slightly larger log.

              It is possible this could have been caused by the ESC connection coming a little loose or large amount of noise messing with your pwm signal. Make sure things are plugged in properly and you have a light twist in any long power leads.

              Good luck, Sorry I can't tell you more.

This reply was deleted.

Activity

Neville Rodrigues liked Neville Rodrigues's profile
Jun 30
Santiago Perez liked Santiago Perez's profile
Jun 21
More…