Graham, Myself and the pilot Ryan after the successful 100+ KM flight

It seems to fly for a distance of 100 KM with our electric air plane equip with APM or so is a norm now a day. Someone even suggest to rise the bench mark to 150 KM as the entry level for long range challenge.

A few months ago, I gave it a try with my Skywalker carry 2 piece 6S 5000 mah battery in parallel. It travelled some 80 km before the ESC cut because of low voltage protection. Although the attempt was fail, but I learn some lessons. The first lesson was, it is not as easy as I think.

Skywalker is a little draggy by design, facing a strong head winds, sometimes it's ground speed will drop to a few KM per hour. It is struggling in windy condition and unfortunately, this is the condition where we usually have to deal with in tropical area. With the two big and heavy battery in the fuselage, it is also very difficult to find space for our mapping camera. But don't get me wrong, Skywalker, especially the 2014 version is a very capable air frame for what I consider mid range ( 20 to 30 KM ) mission.

Recently I read quite a number of good report of the Zeta Science FX 79. Being a flying wing design, it has a lot of space for battery AND my on board equipment. The removable wing also make this huge wing ( 2 meter wings span ) become very easy to transport.

For this 100 KM challenge, my set up is :

Zeta Science FX79
APM 2.6 external compass
3.02 firmware
Analog air speed sensor
2 pieces 6S 5000 mah battery in parallel
T motor 3110-470
APC 12 x 8
CC Edge 50 A
attopilot current sensor
Savox 257 servo
3DR 433 telemetry.
Futaba 10C radio system
All up weight : 3.4 KG

I start the flight in the afternoon in windy condition. According to APM, the winds blow at 10 to 30 KM per hour in east or north east direction. It is certainly not a favourable condition to go for the badge but I would like simulate the actual flying condition for our usual mission.

Launching a big and heavy wings need a little caution, I wear a welder grove to protect my hand from the hungry rear propeller. With my power set up, take off is quite easy with a little head winds. After some minor trim and it start the mission.

The flight path was planned along our local Sandakan Turf Club race track. The distance of the track is 1.4 KM. This will be easier for me to confirm the total distance after the flight. I also plan it to fly at 100 meter hoping for calmer condition at lower altitude.

APM 2.6 and the latest 3.02 firmware was rock solid throughout the whole flight. After 78 rounds and the battery voltage drop to below 20 volt, I terminate the mission. After some simple calculation, it was 109 KM and APM show slightly more. The whole flight duration was one hour and 57 minutes.

My next target now is 150 KM WITH reasonable extra payload. After all, no point for us to fly for hours and come back empty handed.

I would like to thank Prof LianPin Khoo, Prof Serge Wich, Simon and Brenden of conservationdrones for their encouragement and technical advise. I also want to thank Graham who came all the way from Medan, Indonesia to have a great time flying together and tune up his conservationdrones Maja. He make the two long hours a lot of fun. Special thanks to the Arduplane development team lead by Andrew Tridge. Without all their hard work, we are still confine to fly a few hundred meter from us for fun. Thanks guys.

Here is the link for the tlog.


Views: 17852

Comment by Gary Mortimer on May 12, 2014 at 4:37am

Congratulations, badge issued!

Comment by Simon Wunderlin on May 12, 2014 at 7:17am

Congratulations Keeyen!

Comment by Craig Defleming on May 12, 2014 at 9:30am

what is the reason for using 6s? does the motor require a 6s? would you not get better efficiency from a 4s?

Comment by JNJO on May 12, 2014 at 9:42am

Congrats, team. Good job.

Comment by Simon Wunderlin on May 12, 2014 at 9:52am

Hi Craig. While I cannot speak for keeyen, ConservationDrones is looking for applications that can be deployed. This type of UAV is going to be used by researchers, it was not picked to be used for a record flight in the first place.

ConservationDrones has by now deployed UAVs at about 40 locations worldwide [1]. Easy handling and easy availability of components around the globe is one of the goals we are working towards. Most standard chargers peak at 5A output. 2*5A 6S is easier to handle than 3*5A 4S (less wiring, less charger, quicker to deploy) in the field. For a pure record flight, there is still some room for optimization, with a 4S setup, BEC, wiring and engine weight could be reduced.


Comment by Craig Defleming on May 12, 2014 at 11:47am

Thanks Simon. Has ConservationDrones looked at using the skyeye at all? thats what we are using and so far have found it to be a great flyer. Still working on getting the kinks worked out of apm, but the first tests have been encouraging. with the right balance of batteries i think the skyeye could fly 100km.

Comment by Gary Mortimer on May 12, 2014 at 11:59am

I'm loving the X UAV Talon for my conservation work, it needs a bit of room though.

Comment by eduardo on May 12, 2014 at 1:55pm

congrats ..

last month i flied 87km with my 2.6m flywing that have pitch/roll gimbal and one samsung nx300cam

I used 20amp / 4s lipo

THis wing have 7.4kg weight.

I think this wing can easy reach 100km without gimbal / cam.

Btw , i do this flight using poligon scan that have much more curves and the oval circuit.

unfortunately this wing touched a transmission line and burned.

Comment by Hein du Plessis on May 12, 2014 at 2:50pm
Well done!! Any reason selecting fx79 over the skywalker x8?

Comment by keeyen pang on May 12, 2014 at 4:32pm
Thanks for all the kind words.
Hi Craig, apart from Simon's explanation, higher voltage will give you better efficiency. Given the low KV of the motor, 6S battery is a must to generate enough thrust for take off.
Hi Simon, thanks for sharing conservationdrones goal and yes, the current set up was selected to be used for normal mission flying rather than record breaking.
Hi Hein, I think both X8 and FX 79 are great. Base on some review, it suggest that the FX 79 is like a improved X8 and it can handle higher speed.


You need to be a member of DIY Drones to add comments!

Join DIY Drones

© 2020   Created by Chris Anderson.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service