Hello everyone,
I would like to briefly introduce a product that has been in development for more than a year now and is planned to enter production this summer. It's a low latency, long range, glass-to-glass video transmission system.
Remarkable features are a long range operating distance (7 kilometres tested at 100mW using an economic 8 dB patch antenna at the receiver), a glass-to-glass video latency of 80 milliseconds with plans of bringing it below 50 milliseconds, three supported video frequencies (900 MHz, 2.4 and 5.8GHz) and a very small transmitter size of 63x38 millimetres.
Please visit Fpv.Red for more details, send us an email or ask in the comments for any question.
Comments
Looks very interesting, but comparing a 900 MHz (btw illegal where I live) system to a 2.4 GHz for range.. Cmon!
Why not compare it to a similar frequency AV system?
If it comes in around 500usd, I'm in
@itcanonlybejared
50 mile ranges is nearly impossible to achieve without either relays or satellite links, are you achieving this number using free space loss calculations?
Very nice work. I have a project I'm working on that achieves roughly 40ms glass-to-glass depending on the latency of the monitor used. But It's not a plug and play system I would be able to sell. It will cost me $1000~ by the time It's done and will allow a 50 mile range @ 1080p 60fps 1.5 - 6mbps
yes the price is the key point...
Looks very promising, and as always the decider for success will be the price.
And on a side note, in today's world of business I think you are looking for trouble using "red" in the product name.
Hello Ravi, Telemetry is one way only, unfortunately. At least in this version. Are you asking about exposing telemetry data from the receiver as a UART/Mavlink read only interface?
would it have provisions for telemetry as a future upgrade?
A 2.4 for me please ;-)
Hello JB, The system is not based on Wi-Fi and doesn't comply with the strict frequency hopping restrictions of Wi-Fi devices. The 900 MHz version is meant for US/Canada (ITU Region 2), Europe won't be able to use it (as least from my superficial understanding). This is the reason for the different operating frequencies. Tom, no, sorry, you are forced to select a single option :). Thank you Fnoop!
Davide
-
1
-
2
-
3
of 3 Next